In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 195–209
Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.13cie
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.13cie
Image schemas have been a fundamental construct in cognitive linguistics, providing grounds for psychological, philosophical, as well as linguistic research. Given the focus in cognitive linguistics on embodied experience as a fundamental basis for language structure and meaning, the employment of image schemas in the analysis of gesture with speech is a logical extension. However, given their level of abstraction, to what degree do image schemas provide a useful explanatory tool for researching the concrete, physically embodied details of gestures? This article considers the answer to this question and then turns to a more recent theoretical development that complements the picture by encompassing a different realm of cognitive and linguistic phenomena. This research, on ‘mimetic schemas’, is shown to have great potential for thinking about some known phenomena of gesture in a new way. Schema research on these different levels thus provides a useful means to analyze behavior in another modality involved in spoken language use, namely the visual.
Keywords: gesture, image schema, metaphor, mimetic schema
References (63)
Andrén, M. (2008). Iconicity, object manipulation, and schematicity in the development of children’s bodily communication. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Bressem, J. (2008). Clusters of image schematic patterns in coverbal gestures. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Calbris, G. (2003). From cutting an object to a clear cut analysis: Gesture as the representation of a preconceptual schema linking concrete actions to abstract notions. Gesture, 3(1), 19–46.
Cienki, A. (1997). Some properties and groupings of image schemas. In M. Verspoor, K.D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3–15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (1998a). Straight: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics, 9, 107–149.
. (1998b). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap (pp. 189–204). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
. (1999). Metaphors and cultural models as profiles and bases. In R.W. Gibbs, Jr. & G.J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 189–203). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2005). Image schemas and gesture. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 421–441). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2008). Why study metaphor and gesture? In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 5–25). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012). Usage events of spoken language and the symbolic units we (may) abstract from them. In J. Badio & K. Kosecki (Eds.), Cognitive processes in language (pp. 149–158). Bern: Peter Lang.
Clark, H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T.E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27–63). New York: Academic Press.
Dewey, J. ([1925] 1958). Experience and nature. New York: Dover Publications. [Original edition: Chicago/London: Open Court].
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Emanatian, M. (1997). The spatialization of judgment. In W.A. Liebert, G. Redeker, & L. Waugh (Eds.), Discourse perspective in cognitive linguistics (pp. 131–147). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fricke, E. (([2008] 2012). Grundlagen einer multimodalen Grammatik des Deutschen: Syntaktische Strukturen und Funktionen. Habilitationsschrift, Frankfurt/Oder: Europa-Universität Viadrina. Republished as Grammatik multimodal (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter).
Gibbs, R.W., Jr. (2005). The psychological status of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 113–135). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R.W., Jr., & Colston, H. (1995). The psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 347–378.
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Grady, J. (2005). Image schemas and perception: Refining a definition. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 35–55). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hampe, B. (Ed.). (2005). From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Harrison, S. (2009). Grammar, gesture, and cognition: The case of negation in English. PhD dissertation. Bordeaux, France: Université Michel de Montaigne.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (2005). The philosophical significance of image schemas. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 15–33). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kant, I. ([1781] 1968). Critique of pure reason. Translated by N.K. Smith. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M.R. Key (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
Ladewig, S.H. (2006). Die Kurbelgeste: Konventionalisierte Markierung einer kommunikativen Aktivität. Freie Universität Berlin, Unpublished MA thesis.
. (2011). Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes, 6. Consulted 30 December 2011. URL: [URL].
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levinson, S.C. (2003). Space in language and cognition: Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liddell, S. (2003). Grammar, gesture, and meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linell, P. (2005). The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins, and transformations. London: Routledge.
Mandler, J. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604.
. (2005). How to build a baby: III. Image schemas and the transition to verbal thought. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 137–163). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Merleau-Ponty, M. ([1945] 1962). Phenomenology of perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London: Routledge.
Minsky, M. (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P.H. Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York: McGrawHill.
Mittelberg, I. (2010). Geometric and image-schematic patterns in gesture space. In V. Evans P. Chilton& (Eds.), Language, cognition and space: The state of the art and new directions (pp. 351–385). London: Equinox.
Müller, C. (1998a). Iconicity and gesture. In S. Santi, Guaïtella, Cavé & Konopczynski (Eds.), Oralité et gestualité: Communication multimodale, interaction (pp. 321–328). Paris: L’Harmattan.
. (1998b). Redebegleitende Gesten. Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag A. Spitz.
. (2008). What gestures reveal about the nature of metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 219–245). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oakley, T. (2007). Image schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, N. (1991). The cultural basis of metaphor. In J.W. Fernandez (Ed.), Beyond tropes: The theory of tropes in anthropology (pp. 56–93). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W.D., Johnson, D.M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382–439.
Roth, W.M., & Lawless, D.V. (2002). How does the body get into the mind? Human Studies, 25, 333–358.
Rumelhart, D.E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R.J. Spiro, B.C. Bruce & W.F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 38–58). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schank, R.C., & Abelson, R.P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Streeck, J. (2009). Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Teßendorf, S., & Ladewig, S. (2008). The brushing-aside and the cyclic gesture–reconstructingtheir underlying patterns. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Tomasello, M. (1992). First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E.C. (1988). Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 406–416.
Williams, R.F. (2008). Path schemas in gesturing for thinking and teaching. Talk presented at the third conference of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association, Leipzig, Germany, September 2008.
Zlatev, J. (2005). What’s in a schema? Bodily mimesis and the grounding of language. In B. Hampe (Ed.), From perception to meaning: Image schemas in cognitive linguistics (pp. 313–342). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2007a). Language, embodiment and mimesis. In T. Ziemke, J. Zlatev & R. Frank (Eds.), Body, language and mind, vol. 1: Embodiment (pp. 297–337). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2007b). Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica, 2–3(46–47), 123–152.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Holm, Anne
Kraśnicka, Izabela
Fabricius, Steffi, Ulrich Riegel, Mirjam Zimmermann & Benedict Totsche
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
