Cover not available

In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 131–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The establishment of interpretative expectations in film

Published online: 15 October 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.09bat
In this paper we show that some notions from the textual organisation of verbal texts appear also to give insights to the organisation of films. In particular, the beginnings of films are suggested to operate as indicators of those films’ ‘method of development’ and so serve to set up expectations for guiding hypotheses and selective attention during film viewing. By means of a small exploratory study, we demonstrate that film beginnings exhibit differing organisational features that correlate with the overall narrative strategies pursued in the films as a whole. These features may then function as useful indicators for viewers concerning just what interpretative challenges they will face later in the film.
References (39)
Anderson, J.D. (1996). The reality of illusion: An ecological approach to cognitive film theory. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, J.A. (2007). Towards a grande paradigmatique of film: Christian Metz reloaded. Semiotica, 167(1/4), 13–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, J.A., & Schmidt, K.H. (2012). Multimodal film analysis: How films mean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booth, W. (1961). Rhetoric of fiction. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002). Film futures. SubStance, 31(1), 88–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, E. (2002). Nearly true: forking plots, forking interpretations. A response to David Bordwell’s ‘Film Futures’. SubStance, 31(1), 105–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buckland, W. (Ed.). (2009). Puzzle films: Complex storytelling in contemporary cinema. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (2008). The philosophy of motion pictures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fries, P.H. (1995). Themes, methods of development, and texts. In R. Hasan & P.H. Fries (Eds.), On subject and theme: A discourse functional perspective (pp. 317–359). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghadessy, M. (Ed.). (1995). Thematic development in English texts. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodal, T. (1999). Emotions, cognitions, and narrative patterns in film. In C. Plantinga & G.M. Smith (Eds.), Passionate views: Film, cognition, and emotion (pp. 127–145). Baltimore/London: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English – Parts 1 and 2. Journal of Linguistics, 3, 37–81 and 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K., & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, P.K. (2007). Reconsidering the unreliable narrator. Semiotica, 165(1/4), 227–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartmann, B. (2009). Aller Anfang: Zur Initialphase des Spielfilms. Marburg: Schüren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heath, S. (1975). Film and system: terms of analysis. Part I. Screen, 16(1), 7–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, J. (2011). Unreliable and discordant film narration. Journal of Literary Theory, 5(1), 57–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luchins, A.S., & Luchins, E.H. (1962). Primary-recency in communications reflecting attitudes toward segregation. Journal of Social Psychology, 58, 357–369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, J.R. (1983). Conjunction: the logic of English text. In J.S. Petöfi & E. Sözer (Eds.), Micro and macro connexity of discourse (pp. 1–72). Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metz, C. (1974). Language and Cinema. The Hague: Mouton. Translated by D.J. Umiker-Sebeok. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monaco, J. (2009). How to read a film: Movies, media and beyond. 30th edition. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Münsterberg, H. (1916). The photoplay: A psychological study. New York: D. Appleton and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Persson, P. (2003). Understanding cinema. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Propp, V. (1968). The morphology of the folktale. Austin, Texas: University of Texas Press. Originally published in Russian in 1928.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T.J., & Henderson, J.M. (2008). Edit blindness: The relationship between attention and global change blindness in dynamic scenes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(2)(6),1–17.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, T.J., Levin, D.T., & Cutting, J.E. (2012). A window on reality: Perceiving edited moving images. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(2), 107–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseng, C. (2008). Cohesive harmony in filmic text. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal semiotics: Functional analysis in contexts of education (pp. 87–104). London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2012). Audiovisual texture in scene transition. Semiotica, 192, 123–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tseng, C., & Bateman, J.A. (2012). Multimodal narrative construction in Christopher Nolan’s Memento: A description of method. Journal of Visual Communication, 11(1), 91–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (1991). Conjunctive structure in documentary film and television. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, 5(1), 76–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogler, C. (1998). The writer’s journey: Mythic structure for writers. Studio City, CA: Michael Wiese Productions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wildfeuer, J. (2013). Film discourse interpretation: Towards a new paradigm for multimodal film analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wuss, P. (2009). Cinematic narration and its psychological impact: functions of cognition, emotion and play. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zacks, J. M, Speer, N. K, & Reynolds, J.R. (2009). Segmentation in reading and film comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 138, 307–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ramos Pinto, Sara & Aishah Mubaraki
2020. Multimodal corpus analysis of subtitling. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 32:3 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue