In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 115–130
Visual metonymy in children’s picture books
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.08moy
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.08moy
This article aims to explore how the use of visual metonymies in picture books contributes to children’s understanding of stories and, in turn, attracts their attention towards relevant aspects of the plot. The two picture books selected for analysis are Gorilla, by Browne and The Tale of Peter Rabbit, by Potter, intended for children under 9 years of age.
A multimodal and cognitive perspective is adopted here to apply the non-verbal trope of visual metonymy to the two picture books that form the sample texts (Forceville, 2009, 2010; Forceville & Urios-Aparisi, 2009).
The results of the analysis show that visual metonymies are essentially used in children’s tales to create narrative tension in certain stages of the plot and, in turn, to establish a bond between the represented participants and the child-viewer.
References (46)
Barcelona, A. (Ed.). (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bartsch, R. (2002). Generating polysemy: Metaphor and metonymy. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 49–74). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bal, M. (2006). Reading ‘Rembrandt’: Beyond the word-image opposition. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Carpenter, H. (1989). Excessively impertinent bunnies: The subversive element in Beatrix Potter. In G. Avery & J. Briggs (Eds.), Children and their books: A celebration of the work of Iona and Peter Opie (pp. 271–298). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Cerrillo, P., & Yubero, S. (2007). Qué leer y en qué momento [What to read and when]. In P. Cerrillo & S. Yubero (Eds.), La formación de mediadores para la promoción de la lectura. Segunda Edición [Training specialists in the promotion of reading. Second edition] (pp. 285–293). Cuenca: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de CastillaLaMancha.
Dirven, R., & Pörings, R. (Eds.). (2002). Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1–14.
. (2006). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitive framework. Agendas for research. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven & F. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics: Current applications and future perspectives (pp. 379–402). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A.J. Moya (Eds.), The world told and the world shown: Multisemiotic Issues (pp. 57–74). Basingstoke/ New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
. (2010). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multimodal discourse? In R. Caballero & M.J. Pinar (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 57–76). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de CastillaLa Mancha.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, T. (2002). Visual and verbal playmates: An exploration of visual and verbal modalities in children’s picture books. Unpublished B.A. (Honours), University of Sydney, Australia.
Hidalgo, L., & Kraljevic-Mujic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153–178.
Hunt, P. (Ed.). (2004). International companion encyclopedia of children’s literature. Second Edition. Volume I. London: Routledge.
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K.U. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading images. The grammar of visual design.London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
Moya, A.J. (2010). A multimodal analysis of Tale of Peter Rabbit within the interpersonal metafunction. ATLANTIS, 32(1), 123–140.
. (2011a). Engaging readers through language and pictures. A case study. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(12), 2982–2991.
. (2011b). A bimodal and systemicfunctional study of Dear Zoo within the textual metafunction. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 62, 123–138.
Moya, A.J., & Ávila, J.A. (2009). Thematic progression of children’s stories as related to different stages of cognitive development. Text and Talk, 29(6), 755–774.
Panther, K.U., & Radden, G. (Eds.), (1999). Metonymy in language and thought. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Panther, K.U., & Thornburg, L.L. (Eds.), (2003). Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Pérez, P. (2011). Don’t be so green. Analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in greenwashing advertisements. Available at: [URL]. Logroño: University of La Rioja.
Perez-Sobrino, P. (2013a). Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola & F. Ervas (Eds.), Metaphor in Focus. Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor Use (pp. 67–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2013b). Humanimals. What do multimodal metaphor and metonymy reveal about meaning creation in environmental advertising? Proceedings of XXX International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (pp. 402–408). Lerida: University of Lerida UP.
Potter, B. (2002[1902]).
The Tale of Peter Rabbit
. In F. Warne (Ed.), Beatrix Potter. The complete tales. The original and authorized edition (pp. 9–20). London: Penguin.
Purver, M., Howes, C., Healey, P.G., & Gergoromichelaki, E. (2009). Split utterances in dialogue: a corpus study. Available at: [URL].
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. (2000). The role of mapping and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2002). From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum, An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 107–143.
. (2011). Metonymy and cognitive operations. In R. Benczes, A. Barcelona & F.J. Ruiz de Mendoza (Eds.), Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 103–124). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J., & Díez, O.I. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532).Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Scott, C. (2001). An unusual hero: Perspective and point of view in The Tale of Peter Rabbit. In M. Mackey (Ed.), Beatrix Potter’s Peter Rabbit: A children’s classic at 100 (pp. 19–30). Lanham, MC: Scarecrow.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Taylor, J.R. (2002). Category extension by metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 323–334). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
UriosAparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 95–117). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Warren, B. (2002). An alternative account on the interpretation of referential metonymy and metaphor. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 113–130). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Cañamares-Torrijos, Cristina & Ramón F. Llorens-García
Huang, Ding & Jiajin Xu
Bonifazi, Anna & Pinelopi Ioannidou
Martínez-Carratalá, Francisco Antonio & Cristina Cañamares Torrijos
Cañamares Torrijos, Cristina
2019. Lectura literaria y multimodal del álbum ilustrado. In Current perspectives on literary reading [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 22], ► pp. 145 ff.
Cañamares Torrijos, Cristina
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
