In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 99–114
The visual representation of metaphor
A social semiotic approach
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.07fen
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.07fen
Complementing cognitive theories which attribute the understanding of visual metaphors to situational and cultural contexts, this study adopts a social semiotic perspective to investigate how visual images themselves are constructed to cue conceptual metaphors. The visual realization of metaphors in representational, interactive and compositional meaning structures is elucidated based on Kress and van Leeuwen’s (2006) visual grammar. It is found that most types of visual metaphor identified by cognitive linguists can be explained within the framework. Instances of visual metaphor in advertisements are analyzed in terms of their persuasive effects. It is concluded that the social semiotic framework is able to provide a comprehensive account of the visual realization of metaphor, and in addition, the study also offers a cognitive explanation of how resources like camera positioning and composition acquire meanings.
References (23)
. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Feng, D. (2011a). Visual space and ideology: A critical cognitive analysis of spatial orientations in advertising. In K.L. O’Halloran & B. Smith (Eds.), Multimodal studies: Exploring issues and domains (pp. 55–75). London: Routledge.
. (2011b). The construction and categorization of multimodal metaphor: A systemic functional approach. Foreign Language Research, 1, 24–29.
Forceville, C. (1994). Pictorial metaphor in advertisements. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 9(1), 1–29.
. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. UriosAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2007). Washing th brain: Metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed). London: Routledge.
Morris, R. (1993). Visual rhetoric in political cartoons: A structuralist approach. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 8(3), 195–210.
O’Halloran, K.L. (2005). Mathematical discourse: Language, symbolism and visual images. London: Continuum.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Finzel, Anna & Neele Mundt
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2020. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 7:1 ► pp. 78 ff.
Kashanizadeh, Zahra & Charles Forceville
2022. Visual and multimodal interaction of metaphor and metonymy. In Visual Metaphors [Benjamins Current Topics, 124], ► pp. 83 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
