In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 27–44
Metaphor and symbol
SEARCHING FOR ONE’S IDENTITY IS LOOKING FOR A HOME in animation film
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.03for
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.03for
The quickly growing discipline of multimodality has hitherto primarily found its inspirational models in semiotics and in Systemic Functional Linguistics. However, Cognitive Linguistics, and specifically its Conceptual Metaphor
Theory branch, has over the past years proved a store of knowledge and methods of analysis that can benefit the further advance of the young discipline. In this paper the metaphor searching for one’s identity is looking for a home in animation films is examined. It is shown that (a) analysing this metaphor presupposes understanding “home” as a symbol; (b) animation has medium-specific affordances to implement the metaphor; (c) the metaphor combines embodied and cultural dimensions.
References (39)
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, D.E. (2010 [1991]). The universal people. In B. Boyd, J. Carroll & J. Gottschall (Eds.), Evolution, literature & film (pp. 83–95). New York: Columbia University Press.
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Journal of Visual Communication, 10, 209–229.
Coëgnarts, M., & Kravanja, P. (2012). From thought to modality: A theoretical framework for analysing structural-conceptual metaphor and image metaphor in film. Image [&] Narrative, 13(1),96–11
Fahlenbrach, K. (2007). Embodied spaces: Film spaces as (leading) audiovisual metaphors. In J.D. Anderson & B. FisherAnderson (Eds.), Narration and spectatorship in moving images (pp. 105–124). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholar Press.
. (2010). Audiovisuelle Metaphern: Zur Korper- und Affektasthetik in Film und Fernsehen. Marburg: Schuren.
Fludernik, M. (Ed.). (2011). Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor. London: Routledge.
. (2006). The source-path-goal schema in the autobiographical journey documentary: McElwee, Van der Keuken, Cole. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 4, 241–261.
. (2010a). Review of C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2009). Journal of Pragmatics, 42, 2604–2608.
. (2010b). Why and how study metaphor, metonymy, and other tropes in multi-modal discourse? In R. Caballero & M.J. Pinar (Eds.), Ways and modes of human communication (pp. 57–76). Cuenca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Castilla La Mancha.
. (2011a). The journey metaphor and the source-path-goal schema in Agnès Varda’s autobiographical gleaning documentaries. In M. Fludernik (Ed.), Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor (pp. 281–297). London: Routledge.
. (2011b). Structural pictorial and multimodal metaphor. Lecture 7/8 of the Course in pictorial and multimodal metaphor. [URL]
Forceville, C., & Jeulink, M. (2011). The flesh and blood of embodied understanding: The source-path-goal schema in animation film. Pragmatics & Cognition, 19, 37–59.
Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 447–480). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R.W. Jr. (1994). The poetics of the mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R.W. Jr., & Steen, G.J. (Eds.). (1999). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hampe, B. (2005). When down is not bad, and up not good enough. A usage-based assessment of the plus-minus parameter in image-schema theory. Cognitive Linguistics, 16, 81–112.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kappelhoff, H., & Müller, C. (2012). Embodied meaning construction: Multimodal metaphor and expressive movement in speech, gesture, and feature film. Metaphor and the Socia World, 1(2), 121–153.
Katz, A.N., & Taylor T.E. (2008). The journeys of life: Examining a conceptual metaphor with semantic and episodic memory recall. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 148–173.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed. published in 2006). London: Routledge.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pettersson, B. (2011). Literary criticism writes back to metaphor theory: Exploring the relation between extended metaphor and narrative in literature. In M. Fludernik (Ed.), Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor (pp. 94–112). London: Routledge.
Ritchie, D.L. (2008). X is a journey: Embodied simulation in metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 174–199.
Rothenberg, A. (2008). Rembrandt’s creation of the pictorial metaphor of self. Metaphor and Symbol, 23, 108–129.
Royce, T.D., & Bowcher, W.L. (Eds.). (2007). New directions in the analysis of multimodal discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Semino, E., & Culpeper, J.V. (Eds.). (2002). Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Yu, N. (1998). The contemporary theory of metaphor: A perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Naciscione, Anita
2020. Multimodal creativity in figurative use. In Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts [Figurative Thought and Language, 7], ► pp. 249 ff.
Forceville, Charles & Thijs Renckens
2013. The GOOD IS LIGHT and BAD IS DARK metaphor in feature films. Metaphor and the Social World 3:2 ► pp. 160 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
