In:Multimodality and Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by María Jesús Pinar Sanz
[Benjamins Current Topics 78] 2015
► pp. 13–26
Cross-modal resonances in creative multimodal metaphors
Breaking out of conceptual prisons
Published online: 15 October 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.02elr
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.78.02elr
This article uses examples of multimodal metaphors from three different genres in order to develop a new understanding of the nature of creativity in metaphor. I argue that multimodality provides distinctive opportunities for metaphor creativity by exploiting the unique affordances of the different semiotic modes and the possibility of combining them in unexpected ways. Such innovation at the level of representation may encourage novel thought patterns, I suggest, even in such cases where the underlying metaphorical mappings are relatively conventional. The notion of “cross-modal resonances” is introduced to emphasize the role of unconscious, preverbal, intuitive understanding and the emotions in producing and interpreting creative multimodal metaphors.
Keywords: advertisements, cartoons, comics, creativity, multimodal metaphor, social semiotics
References (41)
Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Camp, E. (2006). Metaphor in the mind: The cognition of metaphor. Philosophy Compass, 1(2), 154–170. Available at: [URL] (accessed 10.11.2012).
Crisp, P. (2008). Between extended metaphor and allegory: Is blending enough? Language and Literature, 17(4), 291–308.
El Refaie, E. (2003). Understanding visual metaphor: The example of newspaper cartoons. Visual Communication, 2(1), 75–96.
. (2009a). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–196). Berlin/New York: Mouton-de Gruyter.
. (2009b). Multiliteracies: How readers interpret political cartoons. Visual Communication, 8(2), 181–205.
. (2012). Autobiographical comics: Life writing in pictures. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Finke, R.A., Ward, T.B., & Smith, S.M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge/ London: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Fludernik, M. (Ed.). (2011). Beyond cognitive metaphor theory: Perspectives on literary metaphor. New York/London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. (2009). Non-verbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: Agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 19–42). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C., & Urios-Aparisi, E. (Eds.). (2009). Multimodal metaphor. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Gibbs, R.W. Jr. (2011). Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52.
Gibbs, R.W. Jr. & Bogdonovich, J. (1999). Mental imagery in interpreting poetic metaphor. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 14(1), 37–44.
Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929.
Giora, R., Fein, O., Kronrod, A., Elnatan, I., Shuval, N., & Zur, A. (2004). Weapons of mass distraction: Optimal innovation and pleasure ratings. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(2), 115–141.
Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 17–35). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Kress, G. (2000). Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In U.H. Meinhof & J. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media: From genre to everyday life (pp. 132–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
. (2009). What is mode? In C. Jewitt (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of multimodalanalysis (pp. 54–67). London/New York: Routledge.
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen. T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Lemke, J.L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.
Mayr, A. (2008). Language and power: An introduction to institutional discourse. London/New York: Continuum.
McGilchrist, I. (2009). The master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. Yale: Yale University Press.
Mitchell, W.J.T. (2009). Beyond comparison. In J. Heer & K. Worcester (Eds.), A comics studiereader (pp. 116–123). Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor, language, and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rohdin, M. (2009). Multimodal metaphor in classical film theory from the 1920s to the 1950s. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 403–428). Berlin/ New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.
Tardif, T.Z., & Sternberg, R.J. (1988). What do we know about creativity? In R.J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 429–440). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thibodeau, P.H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLOS one, 6(2), 1–11. Available at: [URL] (accessed 11.10.2011).
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Finzel, Anna & Neele Mundt
Heinemann, Sabine
Martynyuk, Alla & Olga Meleshchenko
2022. Socio-pragmatic potential of (verbo)-visual metaphtonymy in Internet memes featuring Donald Trump. Metaphor and the Social World 12:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Tasić, Miloš & Dušan Stamenković
Hart, Christopher & Javier Marmol Queralto
Lang, Jun
2020. Neological cancer metaphors in the Chinese cyberspace. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:2 ► pp. 261 ff.
Naciscione, Anita
2020. Multimodal creativity in figurative use. In Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts [Figurative Thought and Language, 7], ► pp. 249 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
