In:Argumentation in Political Deliberation
Edited by Marcin Lewiński and Dima Mohammed
[Benjamins Current Topics 76] 2015
► pp. 127–150
(How) do participants in online discussion forums create ‘echo chambers’?
The inclusion and exclusion of dissenting voices in an online forum about climate change
Published online: 10 July 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.76.06edw
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.76.06edw
This chapter examines the proposition advanced by Sunstein (2001) and other scholars that political online forums tend to be characterized by in-group homogeneity and group polarization. The chapter adopts a process view of online forums and examines discussions within a time perspective. Five discussion lines on Climategate.nl (a skeptical Dutch online forum on climate change) are investigated. The research focuses on how participants react to the participation of dissidents and on the resulting processes of inclusion and exclusion. Climategate.nl moved in the direction of an ‘echo chamber’ gradually over time. Nevertheless, the forum was never completely homogeneous. The editors played an active role in the inclusion and exclusion of dissidents. A counter-steering moderation policy is needed to keep group polarization and homogenization within certain limits.
References (32)
Dahlberg, Lincoln. 2001. “The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere.” Information, Communication and Society 4 (1): 615–633.
Dessler, Andrew E., and Edward A. Parson. 2006/2010. The science and politics of global climate change: A guide to the debate. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Eemeren, Frans H. 2011. “In context: Giving contextualisation its rightful place in the study of argumentation.” Argumentation 25: 141–161.
van Eemeren, Frans H., and Rob Grootendorst. 1992. Argumentation, communication and fallacies: A pragma-dialectical perspective. London/New York: Routledge.
van Eemeren, Frans H., Peter Houtlosser, Constanza Ihnen, and Marcin Lewiński. 2010. “Contextual considerations in the evaluation of argumentation.” In Dialectics, dialogue and argumentation, ed. by Chris Reed, and Christopher W. Tindale, 115–132. London: College Publications.
Ereaut, Gill, and Nat Segnit. 2006. Warm Words: How are we telling the climate story and can we tell it better? London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
. 2007. Warm Words II: How the climate story is evolving and the lessons we can learn for encouraging public action. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.
Fuchs, Christian. 2006. eParticipation research: A case study on political online debate in Austria. ICT&S Center, Research Paper No. 1.
Garrett, R. Kelly. 2009. “Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14: 265–285.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (Thomas Burger, trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Hill, Kevin A., and John E. Hughes. 1998. Cyberpolitics: Citizen activism in the age of the Internet. Lanham: Rowman, Littlefield Publishers.
Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, politics and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hulme, Mike. 2009. Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johnson, Thomas J., Shannon L. Bichard, and Weiwu Zhang. 2009. “Communication communities or ‘cyberghettos’? A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15: 60–82.
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
Kobayashi, Tetsuro, and Ken’ichi Ikeda. 2009. “Selective exposure in political web browsing. Empirical verification of ‘cyberbalkanization’ in Japan and the USA.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (6): 929–953.
de Koster, Willem. 2010. ‘Nowhere I could talk like that’: Togetherness and identity on online forums. Ph.D. dissertation, Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lewiński, Marcin. 2010. Internet political discussion forums as an argumentative activity type. A pragma-dialectical analysis of online forms of strategic manoeuvring in reacting critically. Amsterdam: SicSat.
Malone, Elizabeth L. 2009. Debating climate change: Pathways through argument to agreement. London: Earthscan.
McKerrow, Raymie E. 1990. “Argument communities.” In Perspectives on argumentation. Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede, ed. by Robert Trapp, and Janice Schuetz, 27–40. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
Mutz, Diana C. 2002. “Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 111–126.
Papacharissi, Zizi. 2002. “The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere.” New Media & Society 4 (1): 9–27.
Schkade, David, Cass R. Sunstein, and Reid Hastie. 2007. “What happened on deliberation day?” California Law Review 95: 915–940.
Tsaliki, Liza. 2002. “Online forums and the enlargement of public space: Research findings from a European project.” The Public 9 (2): 95–112.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Lipińska, Maria & Dariusz Jemielniak
Unuabonah, Foluke O. & Funke J. Oni
Alcorn, Allison A.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
