Cover not available

In:Proto-Indo-European Syntax and its Development
Edited by Leonid Kulikov and Nikolaos Lavidas
[Benjamins Current Topics 75] 2015
► pp. 1–5

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Preface

Published online: 16 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.75.01pre
References (20)
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2013. Construction-Based Historical-Comparative Reconstruction. Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar ed. by Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale, 438–457. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2012. Reconstructing Syntax: Construction Grammar and the Comparative Method. Sign-Based Construction Grammar ed. by Hans C. Boas & Ivan A. Sag, 257–312. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Thomas Smitherman. 2009. Typological Changes in the Evolution of Indo-European Syntax? Diachronica 26:2.253–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Brigitte L.M. 2000. Archaic Syntax in Indo-European: The Spread of Transitivity in Latin and French. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boley, Jacqueline. 2004. Tmesis and Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Innsbruck: Institut für Sprachen und Literaturen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delbrück, Berthold. 1893–1897. Vergleichende Syntax der indogermanischen Sprachen. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakis, Giorgios K. 1997. Studies in the Syntax and Semantics of the Reduplicated Presents of Homeric Greek and Indo-European. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina & Giuseppe Longobardi. 2005. Parametric Comparison and Language Taxonomy. Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation ed. by Montserrat Batllori, Maria-Lluisa Hernanz, Carme Picallo & Francesc Roca, 149–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hettrich, Heinrich. 1990 [1991]. Der Agens in passivischen Sätzen altindogermanischer Sprachen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirt, Hermann. 1934–1937. Indogermanische Grammatik. Vols. VI–VII: Syntax. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortlandt, Frederick H.H. 1983. Proto-Indo-European Verbal Syntax. Journal of Indo-European Studies 11.307–324.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2010. Bridging Typology and Diachrony: A Preliminary Questionnaire for a Diachronic Typological Study of Voice and Valency-Changing Categories. Problemy grammatiki i tipologii: sbornik statej pamjati Vladimira Petroviča Nedjalkova (1928–2009) [Issues in Grammar and Typology: A Memorial Volume for Vladimir Nedjalkov] ed. by Valentin Vydrin, Sergej Dmitrenko, Natalja Zaika, Sergej Saj, Nina Sumbatova & Viktor Xrakovskij, 139–163. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavidas, Nikolaos. 2009. Transitivity Alternations in Diachrony: Changes in Argument Structure and Voice Morphology. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P. 1974. Proto-Indo-European Syntax. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2003. Methods in Parametric Linguistics and Cognitive History. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 3.101–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia. 2004. Null Objects in Latin and Greek and the Relevance of Linguistic Typology for Language Reconstruction. Proceedings of the 15th Annual UCLA Indo-European Conference (= JIES Monograph, 49) ed. by Karlene Jones-Bley, Martin Huld, Angela Della Volpe & Miriam Robbins Dexter, 234–256. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Man.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pires, Acrisio & Sarah G. Thomason. 2008. How Much Syntactic Reconstruction is Possible? Principles of Syntactic Reconstruction ed. by Gisella Ferraresi & Maria Goldbach, 27–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1964. Preliminaries to the Reconstruction of Indo-European Sentence Structure. Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, Cambridge MA ed. by Horace G. Lunt, 1035–1045. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Towards Proto-Indo-European Syntax: Problems and Pseudo-problems. Papers from the Parasession on Diachronic Syntax ed. by Sanford B. Steever, Carol A. Walker, & Salikoko S. Mufwene, 305–326. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue