Cover not available

In:Signs and Structures: Formal Approaches to Sign Language Syntax
Edited by Paweł Rutkowski
[Benjamins Current Topics 71] 2015
► pp. 103–139

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

The point of agreement

Changing how we think about sign language, gesture, and agreement

 | Purdue University
Published online: 17 September 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.71.05wil
This paper reconsiders arguments suggesting that sign language analyses must proceed differently to take into account their gestural, iconic origins. Lillo-Martin & Meier (2011) argue that agreement is ‘person marking’, shown by directionality. Liddell (2003, 2011) argues that directional verbs move between locations associated with referents; given an infinite number of points, the forms of these verbs are unlistable, and therefore just gestural indicating; he claims that this makes sign languages different from spoken languages, a position that I will argue against. In their response, Lillo-Martin & Meier then agree that real-world referent locations are not part of grammar, so language must interface closely with the gestural system. In contrast, Quer (2011) argues that Liddell’s reasoning is flawed. I will present evidence to agree with Quer and argue that the linguistic discussion was prematurely derailed by noting the recent alternate analysis offered by Gökgöz (2013). There may well be a role for visual iconicity in relation to sign language structure, as demonstrated by Schlenker (2013a,b), but unless we pursue linguistic analysis further, we will never get a clear understanding of what that role is.
References (93)
Alibašić Ciciliani, Tamara & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2006. Pronominal system in Croatian Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 9. 95–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Diane & Judy Reilly. 1998. Pah! The acquisition of adverbials in ASL. Sign Language & Linguistics 1(2). 117–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kenneth. 2005. The top ten misconceptions about implicature. In Betty Birner & Gregory Ward (eds.), Drawing the boundaries of meaning: Neo-Gricean studies in pragmatics and semantics in honor of Laurence R. Horn, 21–30. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bagemihl, Bruce. 1989. The crossing constraint and ‘backwards languages’. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7. 481–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma. 2012. The meaning of space in Catalan Sign Language: Reference, specificity and structure in signed discourse. PhD dissertation, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona.
Bates, Elizabeth, Laura Benigni, Inge Bretherton, Luisa Camaioni & Virginia Volterra. 1977. Cognition and communication from 9–13 months. Human Development Report #12, University of Colorado, Boulder.
. 1979. The emergence of symbols: Cognition and communication in infancy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berenz, Norine. 2002. Insights into person deixis. Sign Language & Linguistics 5. 203–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent & Paul Kay. 1969. Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bradley, Charles. 2013. Motion events and event segmentation in ASL. MA thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brentari, Diane. 1998. A prosodic model of sign language phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruner, Jerome. 1975a. The ontogenesis of speech acts. Journal of Child Language 2. 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975b. From communication to language: A psychological perspective. Cognition 3. 255–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bullowa, Margaret. 1977. From performative act to performative utterance: An ethological perspective. Sign Language Studies 16. 193–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo, Alessandra Checchetto, Carlo Geraci & Sandro Zucchi. 2012. The same constituent structure. Paper presented at FEAST 2012, Venice, Italy.
Cormier, Kearsy. 2012. Pronouns. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language — An international handbook, 227–244. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Adam Schembri & Bencie Woll. 2012. Pronouns and pointing in sign languages. Accessed from: [URL].
Cysouw, Michael. 2011. Very atypical agreement indeed. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 153–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 2011. Adjectives. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 2, 1314–1340. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Derefeldt, Gunilla, Tiina Swartling, Ulf Berggrund & Peter Bodrogi. 2004. Cognitive color. COLOR Research and Application 29(1). 7–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Susan. 1973. Verb inflections in American Sign Language and their acquisition by the deaf child. Paper read at Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, 1973.
Fischer, Susan & Diane Lillo-Martin. 1990. understanding conjunctions. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 1(2). 71–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gökgöz, Kadir. 2013. The nature of object marking in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2013. The mirror theory of language: a neurolinguist’s perspective. In Montserrat Sanz, Itziar Laka & Michael Tanenhaus (eds.), Language down the garden path: The cognitive and biological basis for linguistic structure, 333–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmeister, Robert. 1978. The acquisition of American Sign Language by deaf children of deaf parents: The development of demonstrative pronouns, locatives, and personal pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN.
Hoffmeister, Robert & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 1980. The acquisition of sign language. In Harlan Lane & Francois Grosjean (eds.), Recent perspectives on ASL, 61–78. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janis, Wynne. 1992. Morphosyntax of the ASL verb phrase. PhD dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Johnston, Trevor. 2010. Points and pronouns in face-to-face language. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘Between you and me: Local pronouns across modalities’. Radboud University Nijmegen, June 2010.
Kantor, Rebecca. 1982. Communicative interaction: Mother modification and child acquisition of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 36. 233–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kegl, Judy. 2004. Language emergence in a language ready brain: Acquisition. In Lyle Jenkins (ed.), Variation and universals in biolinguistics, 195–236. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2011. Gesture first or speech first in language origins? In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 251–267. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kennedy, Chris & Louise McNally. 2005. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81. 345–381. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klima, Edward & Ursula Bellugi. 1979. The signs of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuhn, Jeremy. 2013. ASL loci: Variables or features? Unpublished manuscript, New York University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacy, Richard. 1974. Putting some of the syntax back into semantics. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.
Langacker, Ronald. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 1995. Real, surrogate, and token space: Grammatical consequences in ASL. In Karen Emmorey & Judy Reilly (eds.), Language, gesture, and space, 19–41. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In Harlan Lane & Karen Emmorey (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 303–320. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammar, gesture, and meaning in ASL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Agreement disagreements. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 161–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Edward Klima. 1990. Pointing out differences: ASL pronouns in syntactic theory. In Susan Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 191–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Richard P. Meier. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 95–141.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linhares, João, Paulo Pinto & Sérgio Nascimento. 2008. The number of discernible colors in natural scenes. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Optics, Image Science, and Vision 25. 2918–2924. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacLaughlin, Dawn. 1997. The structure of determiner phrases: Evidence from American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Boston University.
Malaia, Evie & Ronnie B. Wilbur. 2010. Sign languages: Contribution to neurolinguistics from cross-modal research. Lingua 10. 2704–2706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. Kinematic signatures of telic and atelic events in ASL predicates. Language and Speech 55(3). 407–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. Telicity expression in the visual modality. In Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds.), Telicity, change, and state: A cross-categorial view of event structure, 122–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malaia, Evie, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Marina Milković. 2013. Kinematic parameters of signed verbs. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malaia, Evie, Ruwan Ranaweera, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Tom M. Talavage. 2012. Neural representation of event structure in American Sign Language: fMRI comparison of cortical activations in deaf signers and hearing non-signers. Neuroimage 59. 4094–4101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marín-Franch, Ivan & David Foster. 2010. Number of perceptually distinct surface colors in natural scenes. Journal of Vision 10(9). 1–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mathur, Gaurav & Christian Rathmann. 2012. Verb agreement. In Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds.), Sign language — An international handbook, 136–157. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard. 1990. Person deixis in American Sign Language. In Susan D. Fischer & Patricia Siple (eds.), Theoretical issues in sign language research. Vol. 1: Linguistics, 175–190. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of agreement in signed languages. In Gary Morgan & Bencie Woll (eds.), Directions in sign language acquisition, 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. & Diane Lillo-Martin. 2010. Does spatial make it special? On the grammar of pointing signs in American Sign Language. In Donna B. Gerdts, John C. Moore & Maria Polinsky (eds.), Hypothesis A/Hypothesis B: Linguistic explorations in honor of David M. Perlmutter, 345–360. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milković, Marina. 2011. Verb classes in Croatian Sign Language (HZJ): Syntactic and semantic properties. PhD dissertation, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Neidle, Carol, Judy Kegl, Dawn MacLaughlin, Benjamin Bahan & Robert G. Lee. 2000. The syntax of American Sign Language: Functional categories and hierarchical structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Prospects and challenges for a clitic analysis of (A)SL agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 173–187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Newport, Elissa & Ted Supalla. 2000. Sign language research at the millennium. In Karen Emmorey & Harlan Lane (eds.), The signs of language revisited: An anthology to honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, 103–114. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petitto, Laura. 1987. On the autonomy of language and gesture: Evidence from the acquisition of personal pronouns in American Sign Language. Cognition 27. 1–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petronio, Karen. 1995. Bare noun phrases, verbs, and quantification in ASL. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Quantification in natural languages, 603–618. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland 2011. A point well taken: On the typology and diachrony of pointing. In Donna Jo Napoli & Gaurav Mathur (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 144–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland, Martin Salzmann & Markus Steinbach. 2011. A non-hybrid approach to sign language agreement. Presented at FEAST 2011, Venice, Italy.
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach. 2006. Modality-independent and modality-specific aspects of grammaticalization in sign languages (Linguistics in Potsdam 24). Potsdam: Universitäts-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer. 2009. Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4). 619–666. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quadros, Ronice Müller de & Josep Quer. 2008. Back to back(wards) and moving on: On agreement auxiliaries and verb classes in sign languages. In Ronice Müller de Quadros (ed.), Sign languages: Spinning and unraveling the past, present and future, 530–551. Petropolis, Brazil: Editora Arara Azul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2011. When agreeing to disagree is not enough: Further arguments for the linguistic status of sign language agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 189–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2002. Is verb agreement the same crossmodally? In Richard Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds.), Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, 370–404. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2008. Verb agreement as a linguistic innovation in signed languages. In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 191–216. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
Rathmann, Christian & Gaurav Mathur. 2011. A featural approach to verb agreement in signed languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 197–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schalber, Katharina. 2004. Phonological visibility of event structure in Austrian Sign Language: A comparison of ASL and ÖGS. MA thesis, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schlenker, Philippe. 2011. Iconic agreement. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3/4). 223–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Role shift, context shift, and formal iconicity. Paper presented in the Workshop ‘Linguistic foundations of narration in spoken and sign languages’ at the Annual Conference of the, German Linguistics Society (DGfS), Potsdam.
. 2013b. Anaphora: Insights from sign language. Keynote lecture at the 19th International Congress of Linguists (ICL), Geneva.
Schlenker, Philippe, Jonathan Lamberton & Mirko Santoro. 2013. Iconic variables. Linguistics and Philosophy 36. 91–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Senghas, Ann & Marie Coppola. 2011. Getting to the point: How a simple gesture became a linguistic element in Nicaraguan signing. In Gaurav Mathur & Donna Jo Napoli (eds.), Deaf around the world: The impact of language, 127–163. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stokoe, William. 1991. Semantic phonology. Sign Language Studies 71. 99–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted & Elissa Newport. 1978. How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language. In Patricia Siple (ed.), Understanding language through sign language research, 91–132. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Robin. 2006. Eye gaze in American Sign Language: Linguistic functions for verbs and pronouns. PhD dissertation, University of California at San Diego.
Ware, Colin. 2004. Information visualization (2nd edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. 2003. Representations of telicity in ASL. Chicago Linguistic Society 39. 354–368.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. A reanalysis of reduplication in American Sign Language. In Bernhard Hurch (ed.), Studies in reduplication, 593–620. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Complex predicates involving events, time and aspect: Is this why sign languages look so similar? In Josep Quer (ed.), Signs of the time: Selected papers from TISLR 2004, 217–250. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.
. 2009a. Productive reduplication in a fundamentally monosyllabic language. Language Sciences 31. 325–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Effects of varying rate of signing on ASL manual signs and non-manual markers. Language and Speech 52(2/3). 245–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The semantics-phonology interface. In Diane Brentari (ed.), Sign languages (Cambridge Language Surveys), 357–382. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. Preference for clause order in complex sentences with adverbial clauses in ASL. In Annika Herrmann, Roland Pfau & Markus Steinbach (eds.), Complex sentences and beyond in sign and spoken languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wilbur, Ronnie B., Edward Klima & Ursula Bellugi. 1983. Roots: On the search for the origins of signs in ASL. Chicago Linguistic Society 19. 314–336.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B., Evie Malaia & Robin Shay. 2012. Degree modification and intensification in ASL adjectives. In Maria Aloni, Vadim Kimmelman, Floris Roelofsen, Galit Sassoon, Katrin Schulz & Matthijs Westera (eds.), 18th Amsterdam Colloquium (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 7218, Logic, Language and Meaning), 92–101. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilbur, Ronnie B. & Lisa Petersen 1997. Backwards signing and ASL syllable structure. Language & Speech 40. 63–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue