In:Theory and Data in Cognitive Linguistics
Edited by Nikolas Gisborne and Willem B. Hollmann
[Benjamins Current Topics 67] 2014
► pp. 87–114
The historical development of the it-cleft
A comparison of two different approaches
Published online: 24 September 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.67.04pat
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.67.04pat
This chapter compares two approaches to a particular grammatical change. While Ball (1991, 1994) investigates the development of the it-cleft configuration from within the generative tradition of the 1990s, I have recently re-examined the historical it-cleft data from a constructional perspective (see Patten 2010, 2012). In this chapter, I show how our different theoretical assumptions lead us to categorize and analyse the data differently. I conclude that a constructional approach is better at interpreting the diachronic facts.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard & Stefan Th. Gries
Shibuya, Yoshikata & Kim Ebensgaard Jensen
Ebensgaard Jensen, Kim
2016. Cross-domain variation in the X itself as a grammatical construction. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 3:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
Jensen, Kim Ebensgaard
2024. The only good snowclone is a dead snowclone. In Proverbs within Cognitive Linguistics [Cognitive Linguistic Studies in Cultural Contexts, 16], ► pp. 260 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
