In:Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse: Theoretical and descriptive advances
Edited by Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière and Freek Van de Velde
[Benjamins Current Topics 65] 2014
► pp. 7–27
Intersubjectification and clause periphery
Published online: 29 August 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65.02trau
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.65.02trau
Ways of identifying subjectification and especially intersubjectification are discussed using data from the history of English no doubt and surely. These adverbs arose out of non-modal expressions and were recruited for use as epistemic adverbs and metadiscursive markers. The data are shown not to support the hypothesis that expressions at left periphery are likely to be subjective (oriented toward turn-taking and discourse coherence), those at right periphery intersubjective (oriented toward turn-giving or elicitation of response, and toward the Addressee’s stance and participation in the communicative situation.). While no doubt is subjective at both left and right periphery, surely is intersubjective at both peripheries.
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Mori, Souma
2025. Image-schema transformations, radial category, 3D topological structure, and subjectification. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 12:1 ► pp. 186 ff.
Wiboolyasarin, Watcharapol
Hyun Sook Lee
Sunhee Yae
Rhee, Seongha
2023. On the development of discourse markers from elliptical
structures. In Different Slants on Grammaticalization [Studies in Language Companion Series, 232], ► pp. 198 ff.
la Roi, Ezra
Šinkūnienė, Jolanta
2021.
Žinai ‘you know’ in Lithuanian discourse. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 229 ff.
Kim, Minju
Kim, Minju
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
