In:Corpus Studies in Contrastive Linguistics
Edited by Stefania Marzo, Kris Heylen and Gert de Sutter
[Benjamins Current Topics 43] 2012
► pp. 141–166
Choice of strategies in realizations of epistemic possibility in English and Lithuanian
A corpus-based study
Published online: 5 September 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.43.07uso
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.43.07uso
The paper deals with the qualitative and quantitative parameters of equivalence between the realizations of epistemic possibility in English and Lithuanian. The focus of the contrast is on the auxiliary and adverb strategies (van der Auwera et al. 2005) in English (can, could, may, might vs. maybe, perhaps, possibly) as opposed to the corresponding modal verb and adverb/particle strategies in Lithuanian (galėti “can/could/may/might” vs. gal, galgi, galbūt, rasi, lyg ir “maybe/perhaps/possibly”). The purpose of the corpus-based study is to find out which means of expression are preferable in the two languages and what the scope of their meanings is. The paper will also look at the frequency of epistemic and non-epistemic use of the modal expressions in the original and in translation.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Lorenz, David
2023.
Could be, might be, maybe
. In Different Slants on Grammaticalization [Studies in Language Companion Series, 232], ► pp. 124 ff.
Usonienė, Aurelija & Jolanta Šinkūnienė
2017. Potential vs Use. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 171 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
