In:Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Benjamins Current Topics 124] 2022
► pp. 231–262
Multimodal conceptual patterns of Hungary in political cartoons
Published online: 9 September 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.124.10vir
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.124.10vir
Abstract
Conventionalized positive images of Hungary have been overemphasized in political caricatures ever since the nineteenth century (Tamás 2012, 2014). The present chapter explores the multimodal representations of hungary in cartoons in the period between 1989 and 1990, during which negative images of Hungary became prominent due to the weak financial situation of the country and the political system change. The corpus involves seventyfive cartoons from the satirical magazine Ludas Matyi. Two major claims are justified by adopting Paula Pérez-Sobrino’s (2017) multimodal identification procedure: (1) the interpretation of verbal elements (e.g., labels, verbal texts, and verbal symbols) in political cartoons influences the identification of multimodal conceptual patterns; (2) the dominant patterns that structure the representation of hungary in political cartoons are metonymy-based visual and multimodal metaphors, and both of them occur in metaphorical scenarios. The corpus analysis indicates that the two main target frames, financial crisis and political changes, appear through the sources of human body and object in metaphorical scenarios, such as ordinary scenes, motion, hospital, sport, tale, love, feast, stunt, begging, and church scenes. Apart from identifying the representations of Hungary, visual metonymies as well as textual cues need to be revealed in order to understand what metaphtonymy scenarios are intended in the cartoons.
Keywords: political cartoon, multimodality, metaphtonymy scenario, hungary
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical insights
- 2.1Political cartoon as a genre
- 2.2Relationship of verbal and visual elements in political cartoons
- 2.3Metaphtonymy
- 2.4Methodology
- 3.Corpus-related multimodal structures
- 3.1Metaphoric scenario vs. metaphtonymy scenario
- 3.2Hungary is an object
- 3.3Hungary is a person
- 4.Corpus analysis
- 5.Multimodal conceptual patterns in the corpus
- 6.Conclusions
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (46)
Alousque, I. N. (2014). Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning. Círculo de Linguística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 57, 59–84.
Barcelona, A. (2000). Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bergen, B. (2003). To awaken a sleeping giant: Cognition and culture in September 11 political cartoons. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, culture, and mind (pp. 23–36). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Bolognesi, M., Van den Heerik, R., & Van der Berg, E. (2018). VisMet 1.0: An online corpus of visual metaphors. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 89–113). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10 (2), 209–229.
Burgers, C., & Van Mulken, M. (2017). Humor markers. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 385–399). New York: Routledge.
Đurović, T., & Silaški, N. (2016). Multimodality and the construal of reality in political cartoons: The case of Serbia-EU relationship. Facta Universitatis, Series: Linguistics and Literature, 14 (2), 117–128.
El Refaie, E. (2009). Metaphor in political cartoons: Exploring audience responses. In C. Forceville & E. Urios-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal metaphor (pp. 173–197). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2009). Metonymy in visual and audiovisual discourse. In E. Ventola & A. J. Moya Guljarro (Eds.), The World Told and the World Shown (pp. 56–74). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
(2012). Creativity in pictorial and multimodal advertising metaphors. In R. Jones (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 113–132). Essex: Pearson.
(2016). Pictorial and multimodal metaphor. In N.-M. Klug & H. Stöckl (Eds.), Handbuch Spracheim multimodalen Kontext (pp. 241–260). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C., & van de Laar, N. (2019). Metaphors portraying right-wing politician Geert Wilders in Dutch political cartoons. In E. Hidalgo-Tenorio, M. A. Benitez-Castro & F. De Cesare (Eds.), Populist discourse: Critical approaches to contemporary politics (pp. 292–307). London: Routledge.
Godioli, A., & Pedrazzini, A. (2019). Falling stars and sinking ships: Framing and metaphor in cartoons Brexit. Journal of European Studies, 49(3–4), 1–22.
Goossens, L. (1990). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic actions. Cognitive Linguistics, 1, 323–340.
(1995). From three respectable horses’ mouth: Metonymy and conventionalisation in a diachronically differentiated data base. In L. Goosses, P. Pauwels, B. Rudzka-Ostyn, A. Simon-Vandenbergen & J. Vanparys (Eds.), By word of mouth: Metaphor, metonymy and linguistic action in a cognitive perspective (pp. 175–204). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
(2003). Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 349–378). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Huszár, Á. (Ed.). (2011). „Ápol s eltakar”: A női test mint nemzet metafora finn, francia, magyar, orosz összehasonlításban. In A nő terei (pp. 139–146). Budapest: l’Harmattan.
Kókay, Gy., Buzinkay, G., & Murányi, G. (1994). A magyar sajtó története. Budapest: Magyar Újságírók Szövetsége.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2010). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
László, F. (2007). Vese velővel: A Ludas Matyi története 2. (1957–1992). URL: [URL]
Marín-Arrese, J. (2005). Humour as subversion in political cartooning. In M. Labarta Postigo (Ed.), Approaches to critical discourse analysis (pp. 1–22). València: Universitat de València.
Morozova, O. (2017). Monomodal and multimodal instantiations of conceptual metaphors of Brexit. Lege Artis, 2(2), 250–283.
Musolff, A. (2014). The metaphor of the ‘body politic’ across languages and cultures. In F. Polzenhagen, Z. Kövecses, S. Vogelbacher & S. Kleinke (Eds.), Cognitive explorations into metaphor and metonymy (pp. 85–99). Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.
(2015). Metaphor interpretation and cultural linguistics. Language and Semiotic Studies, 1(3), 31–51.
(2016). Feature metaphor interpretation and intercultural communication. Babel The Language Magazine, 5, 20–24.
Negro Alousque, I. (2014). Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning. Círculo de LingüísticaAplicada a la Comunicación (clac), 57, 59–84.
Pérez-Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2004). Beyond visual metaphor: A new typology of visual rhetoric in advertising. Marketing Theory, 4(1–2), 113–136.
Putz, O. (2016). A trianoni békeszerződés és következményeinek alternatív konceptualizációja 1990 és 2015 között. PhD Dissertation, Doctoral Program of Cultural Linguistics, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest.
Radden, G. (2000). How metonymic are metaphors? In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 17–59). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In A. Barcelona (Ed.), Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads (pp. 109–132). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
(2002). From semantic underdetermination, via metaphor and metonymy to conceptual interaction. Theoria et Historia Scientiarum. An International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies, 1(6), 107–143.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Díez, O. (2002). Patterns of conceptual interaction. In R. Dirven & R. Pörings (Eds.), Metaphor and metonymy in comparison and contrast (pp. 489–532). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Otal Campo, J. L. (2002). Metonymy, grammar and communication. Albolote: Editorial Comares.
Schilperoord, J. (2018). Ways with pictures: Visual incongruities and metaphor. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 11–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schilperoord, J., & Maes, A. (2009). Visual metaphoric conceptualization in editorial cartoons. In C. Forceville & E. UriosAparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp. 213–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Šorm, E., & Steen, G. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 47–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Spooren, W. (2018). Introduction. In G. J. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 1–8). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Takács, R. (2018). Politikai karikatúra Magyarországon 1945–1989. In Á. Tamás & L. Vajda (Eds.), A magyar politikai karikatúra története (pp. 175–185). Budapest: Országház Könyvkiadó.
Tamás, Á. (2012). Changing stereotypes of national minority groups. In J. Hidasi & T. M. Riszovannij (Eds.), Humor and culture 3: Hungarian humour (pp. 153–164). Krakow: Tertium.
(2014). Nemzetiségek görbe tükörben: 19. századi nemzetiségi sztereotípiák Magyarországon. Pozsony: Kalligram.
Van Mulken, M., & Le Pair, R. (2012). Appreciation and interpretation of visual metaphors in advertising across three European countries. In. F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García & A. M. Piquer-Píriz (Eds.), Metaphor in use: Context, culture and communication (pp. 177–193). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Zhang, Shan
2025. Multimodal metaphors in Zuojiang Huashan rock art cultural landscape. Review of Cognitive Linguistics
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
