Cover not available

In:Visual Metaphors
Edited by Réka Benczes and Veronika Szelid
[Benjamins Current Topics 124] 2022
► pp. 61–80

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The visuality of metaphors

A formalist ontology of metaphors

 | Shenkar College
Published online: 9 September 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.124.04gal
Abstract
This chapter proposes to define metaphor as a visual-material structure, the sphere of which is ontological rather than cognitive or conceptual. It argues that the essence of metaphor, as either an aesthetic or a communicative unit or both, resides in the qualitative dimension and appearance, or even materiality, of the metaphorical medium and its form. The chapter thus offers a new theory of metaphor, focusing on the medium of metaphor, which composes and transfigures or reconstructs its target anew: a composition that is prior to understanding or conceptualizing the target. In doing so, the chapter presents a formalist ontology of metaphors, established via an externalist account of metaphors, as opposed to the prevailing cognitivistconceptualist account which I characterize as internalist. The various kinds of metaphor – linguistic, poetic, visual or material – are based on their external structure, rather than an internal-conceptual mechanism of understanding, as assumed by a significant segment of the literature. Visual metaphor, therefore, is the paradigmatic kind of metaphor, the analysis of which can be generalized to other kinds of metaphor.
Furthermore, the chapter tries to overcome the current discrepancy between the formalist character of the metaphorical medium and the dominance of cognitivist and conceptualist theories of metaphor. Challenging these, I claim that if the identity of metaphor is indeed based on its composition, then it is actually based on its aesthetic qualities. That is to say, not only are there autonomous visual or material metaphors, that are not based on linguistic or conceptual ones, but linguistic and conceptual metaphors are based on visuality: they are enabled by the structural possibilities offered by visual media.
Article outline
  • 1.Two models after the linguistic turn
    • 1.ASemantic model
    • 1.BInternalist model
  • 2.Problems in the internalist-conceptual model
  • 3.Ontology
  • Note
  • References
References (31)
References
Aldrich, V. C. (1971). Form in the visual arts. British Journal of Aesthetics, 11(3), 215–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1968). Visual metaphor. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 2(1), 73–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, M. (1954). Metaphor. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 55, 273–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2006). Metaphor and that certain “je ne sais quoi”. Philosophical Studies, 129, 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1994). Visual metaphor. In J. Hintika (Ed.). Aspects of metaphor (pp. 189–218). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danto, A. C. (1981). The transfiguration of the commonplace: A philosophy of art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W., Jr. (2011). Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Embodied metaphor. In J. Littlemore & J. R. Taylor (Eds.), The Bloomsbury companion to cognitive linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. (1984). Art and illusion. 2nd edition. London: Phaidon Press & Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1976). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis: Hackett. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hausman, C. R. (1975). A discourse on novelty and creation. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hausman, C. (1989). Metaphor and art: Interactionism and reference in the verbal and nonverbal arts. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1991). Language and metaphysics: The ontology of metaphor. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 24(1), 25–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hesse, M. (1988). The cognitive claims of metaphor. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 2(1), 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (2015). Embodied understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 875. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd edition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). Conceptual Metaphor Theory. In E. Semino & Z. Demjén (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of metaphor and language (pp. 13–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1990). The invariance hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peacocke, C. (2009). The perception of music: Sources and significance. British Journal of Aesthetics, 49, 257–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Music and experiencing metaphorically-as: Further delineation. British Journal of Aesthetics, 50(2), 189–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, I.A. (1965 [1936]). The philosophy of rhetoric. London and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1979). Metaphor. Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts (pp. 76–116). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Serig, D. (2008). Visual metaphor and the contemporary artist: Ways of thinking and making. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Steen, G.J. (2017). Attention to metaphor: Where embodied cognition and social interaction can meet, but may not often do so. In B. Hampe (Ed.), Metaphor: Embodied Cognition and Discourse (pp. 279–296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stern, J. (2000). Metaphors in context. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Abdulaal, Mohammad Awad Al-Dawoody, Naglaa Fathy Mohammad Atia Abuslema, Amal Zakaria Mahmoud Hal, Asma’ Abdelhaleem Amer & Waheed M. A. Altohami
2023. A multimodal investigation of EFL upper-intermediate learners’ conceptual metaphors of language learning with some psychological implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 3 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue