Cover not available

In:Police Interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Benjamins Current Topics 118] 2021
► pp. 121–149

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Striving for impartiality

Conflicts of role, trust and emotion in interpreter-assisted police interviews

 | University of Derby
 | De Montfort University
Published online: 2 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.07wil
Abstract
In the context of interpreter-assisted police interviews (IAPIs) it is essential for both police officers and interpreters to maintain impartiality at all times. However, there are numerous obstacles on the way towards achieving this fundamental goal. The present study examines whether and how the different conflicts in communication are constructed and controlled within the different phases of police interviews, using a self-administered questionnaire that explores the perceptions of police officers and interpreters. Three areas of conflict pertinent to impartiality were identified: role, trust and emotion. The differing assumptions about the roles of police officers and interpreters, and the respective differing expectations, appear to create barriers in the achievement of trust and in the working relationship as a whole, which may well affect the aim of IAPIs (i.e. to gather reliable information) and alter the interview outcomes. In addition, both police officers and interpreters have strong emotional experiences during IAPIs; however, neither group appear to make conscious efforts to engage in coping strategies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Conflict of role
    • 1.2Conflict of trust
    • 1.3Conflict of emotion
    • 1.4Research questions
  • 2.Method
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Research materials
  • 3.Data analysis: Quantitative
    • 3.1Briefing
    • 3.2Errors
    • 3.3Emotions experienced
    • 3.4Response to emotion
    • 3.5Debriefing
  • 4.Data analysis: Qualitative
    • 4.1Well-being
    • 4.2Language preparation
    • 4.3Lack of briefing
    • 4.4Maintaining control of the interview
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1Conflict of role: How proper briefing may help
    • 5.2Conflict of trust: The issues of perceived competence and control
    • 5.3Conflict of emotion: Dealing with emotions during and after IAPIs
    • 5.4Limitations of the study
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
  • Appendix
References (37)
References
Bakker, Arnold B., and Ellen Heuven. 2006. “Emotional Dissonance, Burnout, and in-Role Performance Among Nurses and Police Officers.” International Journal of Stress Management 13 (4): 423–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2013. Successful Qualitative Research. a Practical Guide for Beginners. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brotheridge, Céleste M., and Alicia A. Grandey. 2002. “Emotional Labor and Burnout: Comparing Two Perspectives of ‘People Work’.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 60 (1): 17–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcés, Carmen Valero. 2015. “The Impact of Emotional and Psychological Factors on Public Service Interpreters: Preliminary Studies.” Translation & Interpreting 7 (3): 90–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra. 2002. “How Faithfully Do Court Interpreters Render the Style of Non-English Speaking Witnesses’ Testimonies? A Data-Based Study of Spanish – English Bilingual Proceedings.” Discourse Studies 4 (1): 25–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, Alejandra. 2009. “A Review of Australian Judges’ Rulings on Appeals on the Grounds of Incompetent Interpreting.” Unpublished BA thesis, University of Western Sydney. [URL]
Hayes, Alejandra, and Sandra Hale. 2010. “Appeals on Incompetent Interpreting.” Journal of Judicial Administration 20: 119–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Her Majesty’s Court Service and Crown Prosecution Service. 2008. Interpreters – Standardised FTFI Terms and Conditions v 013a. Retrieved March 2018 from the National Archives: [URL] [URL]
Hochschild, Arlie R. 1979. “Emotion Work, Feeling Rules, and Social Structure.” American Journal of Sociology 85 (3): 551–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houston, Kate A., Melissa B. Russano, and Elijah P. Ricks. 2017. “‘Any Friend of Yours Is a Friend of Mine’: Investigating the Utilisation of an Interpreter in an Investigative Interview.” Psychology, Crime & Law 23(5): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Elaine. 2006. “Conflicts in How Interpreters Manage Their Roles in Provider – Patient Interactions.” Social Science & Medicine 62 (3): 721–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Interpreters as Co-Diagnosticians: Overlapping Roles and Services Between Providers and Interpreters.” Social Science & Medicine 64 (4): 924–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Provider – Interpreter Collaboration in Bilingual Health Care: Competitions of Control over Interpreter-Mediated Interactions.” Patient Education and Counseling 78 (2): 154–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Elaine, and Soo Jung Hong. 2010. “Not All Are Desired: Providers‘ Views on Interpreters’ Emotional Support for Patients.” Patient Education and Counseling 81 (2): 192–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, Elaine, Hyejung Ju, and Haiying Kong. 2010. “Dimensions of Trust: the Tensions and Challenges in Provider – Interpreter Trust.” Qualitative Health Research 20 (2): 170–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Bente. 2002. “Pragmatic Meaning in Court Interpreting: An Empirical Study of Additions in Consecutively Interpreted Question-Answer Dialogues.” PhD Thesis. Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jehle, Jörg-Martin, Paul Smit, and Josef Zila. 2008. “The Public Prosecutor as Key-Player: Prosecutorial Case-Ending Decisions.” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 14 (2–3): 161–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karatepe, Osman M. and Kayode Dare Aleshinloye. 2009. “Emotional Dissonance and Emotional Exhaustion among Hotel Employees in Nigeria.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 28 (3): 349–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kassin, Saul M., Christine C. Goldstein, and Kenneth Savitsky. 2003. “Behavioral Confirmation in the Interrogation Room: On the Dangers of Presuming Guilt.” Law and Human Behavior 27 (2): 187–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiguru, Gatitu. 2010. “At the Mercy of Others’ Voices: an Illustration of Frequent Interpreter Language Errors in Kenyan Courtrooms.” The University of Nairobi Journal of Language and Linguistics 1: 1–18.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruml, Susan M., and Diana Geddes. 2000. “Exploring the Dimensions of Emotional Labor the Heart of Hochschild’s Work.” Management Communication Quarterly 14 (1): 8–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebese, Samuel. 2011. “A Pilot Study on the Undefined Role of Court Interpreters in South Africa.” Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 29 (3): 343–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Jieun. 2016. “A Case Study of Interpreter-Mediated Witness Statement: Police Interpreting in South Korea.” Police Practice and Research 18 (2): 194–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, Peter, and Robert G. Lee. 2013. “Getting to the Core of Role: Defining Interpreters’ Role-Space.” International Journal of Interpreter Education 5 (2): 54–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lor, Mailee. 2012. “Effects of Client Trauma on Interpreters: an Exploratory Study of Vicarious Trauma.” Master’s thesis, St. Catherine University. [URL]
Mayfield, Katrina. 2016. “The Issues and Challenges Surrounding Interpreter-Assisted Investigative Interviews of Victims and Witnesses.” Master’s thesis, London Metropolitan University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moser-Mercer, Barbara, Alexander Künzli, and Marina Korac. 1998. “Prolonged Turns in Interpreting: Effects on Quality, Physiological and Psychological Stress (Pilot Study).” Interpreting 3 (1): 47–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nakane, Ikuko. 2009. “The Myth of an ‘Invisible Mediator’: an Australian Case Study of English-Japanese Police Interpreting.” PORTAL Journal of Multidisciplinary International Studies 6 (1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nartowska, Karolina. 2014. “Court Interpreter: Lawyer, Psychiatrist, Director or Actor?” In New Tasks for Legal Interpreters and Translators in the Enlarged Europe, edited by Danuta Kierzkowska, 69–79.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pipe, Margaret-Ellen, Yael Orbach, Michael E. Lamb, Craig B. Abbott, and Heather Stewart. 2013. “Do Case Outcomes Change When Investigative Interviewing Practices Change?.” Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 19 (2): 179–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robb, Nadia, and Trisha Greenhalgh. 2006. “‘You Have to Cover Up the Words of the Doctor’.” Edited by Michael Calnan. Journal of Health Organisation and Management 20 (5): 434–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudvin, Mette, and Francesca Pesare. 2017. “Interpreting and Language Mediation for Victims of Human Trafficking:the Case of CIE, Detention Centres for Undocumented Migrants in Bologna, Italy.” TRANS Revista de Traductología 1 (19): 95–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salaets, Heidi, and Katalin Balogh, eds. 2015. Children and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers. Cambridge, Antwerp & Portland: Intersentia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaffer, Sarah A., and Jacqueline R. Evans. 2018. “Interpreters in Law Enforcement Contexts: Practices and Experiences According to Investigators.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 32 (2). 150–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Sonja W. 2016. “Roles, Conflicts, and Disclosures: American Sign Language/English Interpreters’ Adherence to Best Practices in Legal Settings.” Master’s thesis, Western Oregon University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Splevins, Katie A., Keren Cohen, Stephen Joseph, Craig Murray, and Jake Bowley. 2010. “Vicarious Posttraumatic Growth Among Interpreters.” Qualitative Health Research 20 (12): 1705–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue