Cover not available

In:Police Interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Benjamins Current Topics 118] 2021
► pp. 95–120

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Rapport-building in suspects’ police interviews

The role of empathy and face

 | University of East Anglia
Published online: 2 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.06pou
Abstract
Both research and police guidelines acknowledge the value of rapport-building in police interview with suspects (ISs) and provide some insight into how ‘rapport’ may be defined and built in this context. Rapport is, however, difficult to operationalise and assess in practice, other than for the routine legal clarification offered to suspects at the beginning of the interview. This chapter takes an original discourse-pragmatic and ethnographic approach to investigating the forms that rapport takes in a sample of authentic ISs, with particular reference to two dimensions, empathy and face. The article discusses the value and suitability of the identified empathic and ‘face’-relevant expressions with respect to current interview aims and practice. The discussion highlights the underlying bi-functionality of rapport in ISs, demonstrating how the two functions may be reconciled in police interview training and practice.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Rapport, empathy and face
  • 3.Rapport, empathy and face in ISs
  • 4.Insights from interview data
  • 5.Insights from police interview training
    • 5.1Expressing understanding of other’s feelings
    • 5.2Positive regard and other face-enhancing expressions
    • 5.3Negative regard and other face-threatening expressions
  • 6.Concluding discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (28)
References
Abbe, Alison and Susan E. Brandon. 2013. “The Role of Rapport in Investigative Interviewing: A Review.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 10: 237–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alison, Laurence, Emily Alison, Geraldine Noone, Stamatis Elntib, Sara Waring, and Paul Christiansen. 2013. “Why Tough Tactics Fail and Rapport Gets Results: Observing Rapport-based Interpersonal Techniques (ORBIT) to Generate Useful Information from Terrorists.” Psychology, Public Policy and Law 19: 411–431. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arundale, Robert B. 2010. “Constituting Face in Conversation: Face, Facework and Interactional Achievement.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 2078–2105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, Simon. 2011. Zero Degrees of Empathy: A New Theory of Human Cruelty and Kindness. Milton Keynes: Penguin Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barrett-Lennard, Godfrey T. 1981. “The Empathy Cycle: Refinement of a Nuclear Concept.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 26(2): 91–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, Colin and Rebecca J. Milne. 2001. National Evaluation of the Peace Investigative Interviewing Course. Police Research Award Scheme Report No. PRAS/149. London: Home Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
College of Policing [URL]
Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock, and Rebecca Milne. 2008. “The Cognitive Interview: Inexperienced Police Officers’ Perceptions of their Witness/Victim Interviewing Practices.” Legal and Criminological Psychology 13(1): 59–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Jacqueline R., Christina A. Meissner, Susan E. Brandon, Melissa B. Russano and Steven M. Kleinman. 2010. “Criminal versus HUMINT Interrogations: The Importance of Psychological Science to Improving Interrogative Practice”. Journal of Psychiatry and Law 38:215–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Ervin. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Interaction. New York: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hojat, Mohammadreza. 2007. Empathy in Patient Care: Antecedents, Development, Measurement and Outcomes. Philadelphia: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Ulf and Sven-Åke Christianson. 2002. “Murderers and Sexual Offenders’ Experiences of Police Interviews and Inclination to Admit or Deny Crimes.” Behavioral Sciences and the Law 20: 31–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ministry of Justice. 2011. Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses and Using Special Measures. London: UK Government.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kebbell, Mark, Emily J. Hurren and Paul Mazerolle. 2006. “Sex Offenders’ Perceptions of how they were Interviewed”. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 4:67–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kelly, Christopher, Jeaneé C. Miller, Allison D. Redlich, and Steven M. Kleinman. 2013. “A Taxonomy of Interrogation Methods”. Psychology, Public Policy and Law 19: 165–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leary, Timothy F. and Hubert S. Coffey. 1954. “The Prediction of Interpersonal Behavior in Group Psychotherapy.” Group Psychotherapy 7:7–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Limberg, Holger. 2008. “Threats in Conflict Talk: Impoliteness and Manipulation”. In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield and Miriam A. Locher, 155–179. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meissner, Christian A., Alison D. Redlich, Sujeeta Bhatt, and Susan Brandon. 2012. Interview and Interrogation Methods and their Effects on True and False Confessions. [URL].
Miller, William R. and Stephen Rollnick. 2002. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd Edition. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxburgh, Gavin and James Ost. 2011. “The Use and Efficacy of Empathy in Police Interviews with Suspects of Sexual Offences.” Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling 8: 178–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxburgh, Gavin, James Ost, Paul Morris, and Julie Cherryman. 2014. “The Impact of Question Type and Empathy on Police Interviews with Suspects of Homicide, Filicide and Child Sexual Abuse.” Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 21(6): 903–917. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pounds, Gabrina. 2011. “Empathy as ‘Appraisal’: A New Language-based Approach to the Exploration of Clinical Empathy.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7(2). 139–162.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shepherd, Eric. 1991. “Ethical Interviewing.” Policing 7(1): 42–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tickle-Degnen, Linda and Robert Rosenthal. 1990. “The Nature of Rapport and its Non-verbal Correlates.” Psychological Enquiry 1(4): 285–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallano, Jonathan, Jacqueline R. Evans, Nadja Schreiber Compo, and Jenna M. Kieckhaefer. 2015. “Rapport-building during Witness and Suspect Interviews: A Survey of Law Enforcement.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 29: 369–380. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, David and Ray Bull. 2012. “Examining Rapport in Investigative Interviews with Suspects: Does its Building and Maintenance Work?” Police Criminal Psychology 27: 73–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue