Cover not available

In:Police Interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Benjamins Current Topics 118] 2021
► pp. 73–94

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Translating accurately or sounding natural?

The interpreters’ challenges due to semantic typology and the interpreting process

 | University of East Anglia
Published online: 2 July 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.05hij
Abstract
Police interview interpreting is a complex task, as interpreters make difficult choices under pressure and time constraints. The main dilemma of the interpreter is whether to remain faithful to the original text, with the risk of rendering non-idiomatic translations, or to give preference to more idiomatic versions that may entail an addition or an omission from the original text. This article presents an analysis of Spanish-English bilingual police interviews in California. The analysis is based on the discrepancies found between an interpreter present in the interrogation and a control interpreter who translates the whole interview post-hoc. This is an original methodology that can be used for future research in this and other contexts. The results show different types of inaccuracies in the interpretation, which can be attributed to contextual pressures and overall challenges of interpreting and to challenges related to typological differences between the two languages involved.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Forensic linguistics and interpreting
    • 2.1Interpreting skills
    • 2.2Applied language typology
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results: Discrepancies
    • 4.1Agentivity
    • 4.2Information loss
    • 4.3Loss of intensity
    • 4.4Manner of motion
    • 4.5Modal verbs
    • 4.6Euphemisms
    • 4.7Grammar errors
    • 4.8Addition of intensity
    • 4.9Addition of information
    • 4.10Emotions
    • 4.11Other discrepancies
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (41)
References
Alexieva, Bistra. 1997. “A Typology of Interpreter-Mediated Events”. The Translator 3(2): 153–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alonso, Amado. 1964 [1935]. “Noción, emoción, acción y fantasía en los diminutivos”. In Estudios Lingüísticos. Temas españoles, 195–229. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aske, Jon. 1989. “Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look”. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, Susan. 1983. “Sources of Variation in Spanish Verb Construction Usage: The Active, the Dative and the Reflexive Passive”. Journal of Pragmatics 7: 145–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. The Bilingual Courtroom: Court Interpreters in the Judicial Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Negotiation and Communicative Accommodation in Bilingual Police Interrogations: A critical Interactional Sociolinguistic Perspective”. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 207: 29–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Ruth, and Dan I. Slobin (eds.). 1994. Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biagini, Marta, Elena Davitti, and Annalisa Sandrelli. 2017. “Participation in Interpreter-mediated Interaction: Shifting along a Multidimensional Continuum”. Journal of Pragmatics 107: 87–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, Sabine. 2017. “What a Micro-analytical Investigation of Additions and Expansions in Remote Interpreting Can Tell us About Interpreters’ Participation in a Shared Virtual Space”. Journal of Pragmatics 107: 165–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cadierno, Teresa. 2017. “Thinking for Speaking about Motion in a Second Language. Looking Back and Forward”. In Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 279–300. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curcó, Carmen. 1998. “¿No me harías un favorcito? Reflexiones en torno a la expresión de la cortesía verbal en el español de México y en el español peninsular”. Diálogos Hispánicos de Amsterdam 22: 129–171.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Brad. 2000. “The Interpreter as Institutional Gatekeeper: The Social-Linguistic role of Interpreters in Spanish-English Medical Discourse”. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(3): 379–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, J. César. 2006. “Linguistic Politeness in Mexico: Refusal Strategies among Male Speakers of Mexican Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 2158–2187. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna. 2007. “Language as a Witness: Insights from Cognitive Linguistics”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 14(2): 245–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Speaking and Remembering in One or Two Languages: Bilingual vs. Monolingual Lexicalisation and Memory for Motion Events”. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(4): 466–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Constructing Causation in Language and Memory: Implications for Access to Justice in Multilingual Interactions”. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law 20(1): 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “May vs. Might in Native vs. Non-native English: Implications for Inference and Judgement in Legal and Educational Contexts”. Applied Linguistics Review 7(2): 181–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. “Applying Language Typology: Practical Applications of Research on Typological Contrasts between Languages”. In Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 399–418. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Filipović, Luna, and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón. 2018. “Interpreting Meaning in Police Interviews: Applied Language Typology in a Forensic Linguistics Context”. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics VIAL 15: 67–103.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 1997. “Conference Interpreting as a Cognitive Management Problem”. In Cognitive Processes in Translation and Interpreting, ed. by Joseph H. Danks, Gregory M. Shreve, Stephen B. Fountain and Michael McBeath, 96–214. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hale, Sandra Beatriz. 2007. Community Interpreting. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide. 2012. “Placement and Removal Events in Basque and Spanish”. In The events of putting and taking. A crosslinguistic perspective, ed. by Anetta Kopecka and Bhuvana Narasinhan, 123–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Iraide, and Luna Filipović. 2013. “Lexicalisation patterns and Translation”. In Cognitive Linguistics and Translation, ed. by Ana Rojo and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 253–284. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobsen, Bente. 2002. Pragmatic Meaning in Court Interpreting: An Empirical Study in Consecutively Interpreted Question-Answer Dialoguers. Unpublished PhD Thesis. The Aarhus School of Business.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krouglov, Alexander. 1999. “Police Interpreting: Politeness and Sociocultural Context”. The Translator 5(2): 285–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Morales, Humberto. 2005. “Sociolingüística del tabú”. Interlingüística 16(1): 7–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojo, Ana, and Paula Cifuentes-Férez. 2017. “On the Reception of Translations: Exploring the Impact of Typological Differences on Legal Contexts”. In Motion and Space across Languages. Theory and Applications, ed. by Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, 367–398. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Russell, Debra. 2002. Interpreting in Legal Contexts: Consecutive and Simultaneous Interpretation. Burtonsville, Md.: Linstok Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996a. “From ‘thought and language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’”. In Rethinking linguistic relativity, ed. by John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1996b. “Two Ways to Travel: Verbs of Motion in English and Spanish”. In Grammatical constructions. Their form and meaning, ed. by Masayoshi Shibatani and Sandra A. Thompson, 195–220. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “Mind, Code and Text”. In Essays on language functions and language type. Dedicated to T. Givón, ed. by Joan Bybee, John Haiman, and Sandra A. Thompson, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan I., and Nini Hoiting. 1994. “Reference to Movement in Spoken and Signed Languages: Typological Considerations”. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20: 487–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Song, Jae Jung. 2010. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition”. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “Path to Realisation: A Typology of Event Conflation”. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 17: 480–519. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Filipović, Luna
2021. Confession to Make: Inadvertent Confessions and Admissions in United Kingdom and United States Police Contexts. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Filipović, Luna
2022. A Multi-Factor Approach to the Study of L2 Acquisition of Motion Verbs and Motion Constructions: Integration of Typological, Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Aspects. Frontiers in Communication 7 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue