In:Police Interviews: Communication challenges and solutions
Edited by Luna Filipović
[Benjamins Current Topics 118] 2021
► pp. 33–49
“You keep telling us different things, what do we believe?”
Meta-communication and meta-representation in police interviews
Published online: 2 July 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.03mus
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.118.03mus
Abstract
Quotation and reflective interpretation of previous statements are common features in police interviews. Of particular importance is the uncovering of apparent contradictions between earlier and current responses in interviews of suspects. Conflicting statements can be used by officers as triggers to elicit new responses that explain inconsistencies. In linguistic pragmatics, such reflective commenting on utterances is categorised as metacommunication, i.e. ‘communication about communication’, which includes metarepresentation, i.e. second-order representation of another representation through some form of quotation. Such instances of metacommunication are key instances of negotiating the communicative interests of its chief participants, which in suspect interviews consist on the one hand in the interviewers’ purpose of establishing grounds for a potential criminal charge and, on the other hand, the interviewee’s interest in avoiding such a charge. This article analyses exemplary cases of metacommunication in multilingual police interviews from the perspective of quotation pragmatics. The results suggest that police interview training should pay special attention to this area in order to optimise cognitive results.
Keywords: police interview, metacommunication, metarepresentation, pragmatics, quotation
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: Metacommunication and metarepresentation in interviews of suspects
- 2.The importance of being quoted: Cautions, quotations and metacommunicative argument loops
- 3.The importance of being earnestly allowed to reinterpret one’s own quotes
- 4.Conclusions
Notes References
References (32)
Ainsworth, Janet. 2012. “The Meaning of Silence in the right to remain silent.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. by Peter Tiersma and Lawrence Solan, 287–298. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arendholz, Jenny, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds). 2015. The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Brendel, Elke, Markus Steinbach and Jörg Meibauer (eds.). 2011. Understanding Quotation. Linguistic and Philosophical Analyses. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing Quoting as a Ubiquitous Meta-Communicative Act.” In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
College of Policing 2017. Investigative Interviewing. [URL] (accessed 04/12/2017)
Cotterill, Janet. 2004. “‘Just One More Time …’: Aspects of Intertextuality in the Trials of O. J. Simpson.” In Language in the legal process, ed. by Janet Cotterill, 147–161. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
. 2005. “You do not have to say anything…: Instructing the jury on the defendant’s right to silence in the English criminal justice system.” Multilingua: Special issue on Silence in Institutional and Intercultural Contexts 24(1/2): 7–24.
. 2004. “Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of Verbal Evidence Produced by the Police.” In Language in the legal process, ed. by Janet Cotterill, 19–34. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dando, Coral, Rachel Wilcock and Rebecca Milne. 2009. “The Cognitive interview: novice police officers’ witness/victim interviewing practices.” Psychology, Crime and Law 15(8): 679–696.
Gibbons, John. 2003. Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language in the justice system. Oxford: Blackwell.
gov.uk. 2017a. Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) codes of practice; updated 25 October 2017; [URL] (accessed 04/12/2017)
gov.uk. 2017b. Being arrested: your rights; [URL] (accessed 04/12/2017)
Grice, Herbert Paul. 1989. “Logic and Conversation.” In: Herbert Paul Grice. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words, 22–40. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Hübler, Axel and Wolfram Bublitz. 2007. “Introducing metapragmatics in use.” In Metapragmatics in Use, ed. by Wolfram Bublitz and Axel Hübler, 1–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Johnson, Alison J. 2008. “Changing stories. Achieving a change of state in suspect and witness knowledge through evaluation in political interviews with suspects and witnesses.” Functions of Language 15 (1): 84–114.
2013. “Embedding police interviews in the prosecution case in the Shipman trial.” In Legal-Lay Communication. Textual Travels in the Law, ed. by C. Heffer, F. Rock, and J. Conley, 147–167. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Johnson, Alison. 2014. “‘Dr Shipman told you that…’ The organising and synthesising power of quotation in judicial summing-up.” Language and Communication 36 (1): 53–67.
Matoesian, Greg. 2000. “Intertextual authority in reported speech: Production media in the Kennedy Smith rape trial.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 879–914.
Newbury, Philipp and Alison Johnson. 2006. “Suspects’ resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview.” The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 13 (2): 213–240.
Oxburgh, Gavin E., Trond Myklebust and Tim Grant. 2010. “The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective.” The International Journal of Speech Language and the Law 17 (1): 45–66.
Poggi, Francesca and Alessandro Capone (eds.). 2016. Pragmatics and Law: Philosophical Perspectives. New York: Springer.
Rock, Frances. 2012. “The caution in England and Wales.” In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law, ed. by Peter Tiersma and Lawrence Solan, 313–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 2001. “Discourse Markers: Language, Meaning and Context.” In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, Deborah Tannen and Heidi E. Hamilton, 55–75. Oxford: Blackwell.
Scollon, Ronald, Suzanne Wong Scollon, and Rodney H. Jones. 2012. Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
TACIT 2018. Translation and Communication in Training. Norwich: University of East Anglia. [URL]
Vredeveldt, Annelies, Peter J. van Koppen and Pär Anders Granhag. 2014. “The Inconsistent Suspect: A systematic review of different Types of consistency in truth tellers and liars.” In Investigative Interviewing, ed. by Ray Bull, 183–208. New York: Springer Science.
Walsh, David and Ray Bull. 2012. “Examining rapport in investigative interviews with suspects: Does its building and maintenance work?” Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 27: 73–84.