Cover not available

In:Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in Second Language Learning
Edited by Robert M. DeKeyser
[Benjamins Current Topics 116] 2021
► pp. 173–201

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The value of introspective measures in aptitude-treatment interaction research

A window on individual differences in action

 | Sandy Spring Friends School
 | University of Tokyo
 | Texas Tech University
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.116.08sac
Abstract
To explore the value of introspective measures in aptitude-treatment interaction (ATI) research, this study analyzed the cognitive profiles and concurrent think-alouds of six university learners of Japanese who were highly successful, moderately successful, or unsuccessful under two computer-mediated feedback conditions in a larger (N = 80) quantitative ATI investigation (Sachs, 2011). That study had made indirect inferences regarding relationships among individual differences (IDs), cognitive processes, and learning on the basis of correlational results. Using Leow’s (2015) depth-of-processing (DoP) framework as a lens, what we found in the qualitative verbalization data highlighted that learners in the same condition with similar strengths in the IDs that are statistically associated with performance at the group level may nonetheless engage in different cognitive processes and achieve different learning outcomes, and vice versa. The findings also pointed toward more complex ID-DoP and ID-ID interactions that future research could explore, such as the possibility that a weakness in memory might limit the benefits of metalinguistic knowledge and analytic processing in a condition where group-level correlations suggest analysis is relevant to success, or that analytic processing might enhance the value of memory in a condition where memory is relevant to success. In our conclusions, we argue for the value of mixed-methods research in this area.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Review of literature
    • The value of introspective measures in feedback research
    • The value of introspective measures in ATI research
  • Methods
    • Participants
    • Linguistic target
    • Procedure
    • Treatments and tests
  • Concurrent think-alouds
  • Results and discussion
  • Right/Wrong-feedback condition
    • Marvin vs. Henry: Fairly similar on the IDs predicting performance in the Right/Wrong condition, but with different processing and different learning outcomes
    • Nora: Weaknesses in IDs plus shallow processing confirm the overall ATI patterns
  • Diagrams-feedback condition
    • Matt vs. Heath: Fairly similar on the IDs predicting performance in the Diagrams condition, but with different processing and different learning outcomes, possibly related to other IDs
    • Natalie: IDs might interact and limit one another
  • Limitations, conclusions, and future research
  • Note
  • References
References (36)
References
Adrada-Rafael, S. (2017). Processing the Spanish imperfect subjunctive: Depth of processing under different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 477–508. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker-Smemoe, W., & Haslam, N. (2013). The effect of language learning aptitude, strategy use, and learning context on L2 pronunciation learning. Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 435–456. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowles, M. A. (2010). Concurrent verbal reports in second language research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 111–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brooks, P. J., Kempe, V., & Sionov, A. (2006). The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 185–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B., & Sapon, S. M. (1959). Modern Language Aptitude Test. Rockville, MD: Second Language Testing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1993). The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 77(4), 501–514. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2012). Interactions between individual differences, treatments, and structures in SLA. Language Learning, 62(S2), 189–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A., & Wilson, L. (1997). The Visual Patterns Test: A test of short-term visual recall. Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (2003). Who’s on first? Heterophenomenology explained. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10, 1–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2012). How to carry out case-study research. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language research: A practical guide (pp. 95–116). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2004). The definition and measurement of L2 explicit knowledge. Language Learning, 54(2), 227–275. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(3), 445–474. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granena, G., & Yilmaz, Y. (2019). Language aptitude profiles and the effectiveness of implicit and explicit corrective feedback. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 438–451). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsieh, H-C., Moreno, N., & Leow, R. P. (2016). Awareness, type of medium, and L2 development: Revisiting Hsieh (2008). In R. P. Leow, L. Cerezo, & M. Baralt (Eds.), A psycholinguistic approach to technology and language learning (pp. 131–150). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hwu, F., & Sun, S. (2012). The aptitude-treatment interaction effects on the learning of grammar rules. System, 40, 505–521. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). The noticeability and effectiveness of corrective feedback in relation to target type. Language Teaching Research, 18(4), 428–452. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, S. (2013). The interactions between the effects of implicit and explicit feedback and individual differences in language analytic ability and working memory. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 634–654. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 7–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrachione, T. K., Lee, J., Ha, L. Y. Y., & Wong, P. C. M. (2011). Learning a novel phonological contrast depends on interactions between individual differences and training paradigm design. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, 461–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rassaei, E. (2013). Corrective feedback, learners’ perceptions, and second language development. System, 41(2), 472–483. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rebuschat, P. (2014). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge in second language research. Language Learning, 63, 595–626. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robinson, P. (1997). Individual differences and the fundamental similarity of implicit and explicit adult second language learning. Language Learning, 47, 45–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269–292. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, R. R. (2011). Individual differences and the effectiveness of visual feedback on reflexive binding in L2 Japanese (Open-access doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Sachs, R., & Nakatsukasa, K. (2019). Aptitude-treatment interactions in depth of processing: Individual differences and prior linguistics coursework predict learners’ approaches to computer-mediated language learning activities. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 422–437). New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheen, Y. (2007a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 255–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Skehan, P. (2002). Theorising and updating aptitude. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 69–93). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Slabakova, R. (2008). Meaning in the second language. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagarelli, K. M., Ruiz, S., Vega, J. L. M., & Rebuschat, P. (2016). Variability in second language learning: The roles of individual differences, learning conditions, and linguistic complexity. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38, 293–316. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, M. (1995). Acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun and movement of anaphors in Logical Form. Second Language Research, 11(3), 206–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, L., Bruhn-Garavito, J., Kawasaki, T., Pater, J., & Prévost, P. (1997). The researcher gave the subject a test about himself: Problems of ambiguity and preference in the investigation of reflexive binding. Language Learning, 47(1), 145–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y., & Granena, G. (2016). The roles of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 147–161. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue