Cover not available

In:Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Benjamins Current Topics 114] 2021
► pp. 161–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

The predicate as a locus of grammar and interaction in colloquial Indonesian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Melbourne
Published online: 21 April 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.114.07ewi
Abstract
Descriptions of Indonesian usually take the clause as the starting point for analysing grammatical structure and rely on the notion of ellipsis to account for the way speakers actually use language in everyday conversational interaction. This study challenges the status of “clause” by investigating the structures actually used by Indonesian speakers in informal conversation and it demonstrates that the predicate, rather than the clause, plays a central role in the grammar of Indonesian conversation. The preponderance of predicates in the data that do not have explicit arguments suggests that this format is best viewed as the default. When a predicate is produced without overt arguments, reconstructing what arguments may have been elided is often ambiguous or indeterminate and seems to be irrelevant to speakers. An examination of turn-taking, overlap and incrementing in conversation also shows that predicates, rather than full clauses, are the grammatical format participants regularly orient to.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Predicate configurations in conversational Indonesian
    • 2.1Verbal predicates
    • 2.2Non-verbal predicates
    • 2.3When there are no explicit arguments
  • 3.Frequency and distribution of predicate configurations in conversation
  • 4.Predicates in interaction
    • 4.1Turn constructions and predicates
    • 4.2Participant orientation and predicates
      • 4.2.1Next turn onset
      • 4.2.2Joint utterance completion
      • 4.2.3Turn continuations
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Glosses
References (54)
References
Auer, Peter. 1996. On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen & Margret Selting (eds.), Prosody in Conversation, 57–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1). 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2003. Referential density in discourse and syntactic typology. Language 79(4). 708–736. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clayman, Steven E. 2012. Turn-constructional units and the transition relevance place. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of Conversation Analysis, 150–166. Malden MA: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čmejrková, Světla & Carlo L. Prevignano. 2003. On conversation analysis: An interview with Emanuel A. Schegloff. In Carlo L. Prevignano & Paul J. Thibault (eds.), Discussing conversation analysis: The work of Emanuel A. Schegloff, 11–55. Amsterdam, John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon & Yassir Tjung. 2006. Is There Pasif Semu in Jakarta Indonesian? Oceanic Linguistics 45(1). 64–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1989. Language universals and linguistic typology, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, Susanna. 1991. Functional change: The case of Malay constituent order. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Heer, Gerrit Koenraad. 1975. Indonesian syntax. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University PhD thesis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf & Susanne Günthner (eds.). 2015. Temporality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini. 2014. Nih and tuh as spatial deixis in imagined interaction. In Anthony Jukes (ed.), Deixis and spatial expressions in languages of Indonesia. NUSA 56. 27–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Pronouns and sociospatial ordering in conversation and fiction. In Laure Gardelle & Sandrine Sorlin (eds.), The pragmatics of personal pronouns, 195–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djenar, Dwi Noverini, Michael C. Ewing & Howard Manns. 2018. Style and intersubjectivity in youth interaction. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63(4). 805–855. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. & Elise Kärkkäinen. 2012. Taking a stance on emotion: Affect, sequence, and intersubjectivity in dialogic interaction. Text and Talk 32(4). 433–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephen Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cumming. 1993. Outline of discourse transcription. In Jane A. Edwards & Martin D. Lampert (eds.), Talking data: Transcription and coding methods for language research, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick. 2011. Sources of asymmetry in human interaction: Enchrony, status, knowledge and agency. In Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada & Jacob Steensig (eds.), The morality of knowledge in conversation, 285–312. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Grammatical resources for social purposes: Some aspects of stancetaking in colloquial Indonesian conversation. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 69–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. From subordinate clause to noun-phrase: Yang constructions in colloquial Indonesian. In Ritva Laury (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions, 1–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael C. 2005a. Colloquial Indonesian. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 227–258. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015a. Localising person reference among Indonesian youth. In Zane Goebel, Deborah Cole & Howard Manns (eds.), Margins, hubs, and peripheries in a decentralizing Indonesia. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies Special Issue 162: 26–41.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015b. The kalau framing construction in Indonesian comics. In Dwi Noverini Djenar (ed.), Youth language in Indonesia and Malaysia. NUSA 58. 51–72Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2020. Features of Indonesian in Bandung. In Thomas J. Conners & Atsuko Utsumi, (eds.), Aspects of regional varieties of Malay. NUSA 68: 51–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ewing, Michael C. & Susanna Cumming. 1998. Relative clauses in Indonesian discourse: Face to face and cyberspace interaction. In Shobhana L. Chelliah & Willem J. de Reuse (eds.), Papers from the fifth annual meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 79–96. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University Program for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. Constituency and the grammar of turn increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The language of turn and sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Barbara A. 1982. The focus systems in Old Javanese, Tagalog and Proto-Malayo-Polynesian. [Unpublished ms.].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel. 2006. Clause structure and adjuncts in Austronesian languages: A critical introductory survey. In Hans-Martin Gärtner, Paul Law & Joachim Sabel (eds.), Clause Structure and Adjuncts in Austronesian Languages, 1–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, Volume II. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles. 1995. Sentence construction within interaction. In Uta M. Quasthoff (ed.), Aspects of oral communication, 198–219. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa. 2001. Emerging syntax for interaction: Noun phrases and clauses as a syntactic resource for interaction. In Margret Selting & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics, 25–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2005. The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: typological perspectives. In Alexander Adelaar & Nikolaus P. Himmelmann (eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar, 110–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset. In V. D’Urso & P. Leonardi (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric, 11–38. Padua: Cleup Editore.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene H. 1991. On the syntax of sentences in progress. Language in Society 20(3). 441–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macdonald, R. Ross & Soenjono Darjowidjojo. 1967. A student’s reference grammar of modern formal Indonesian. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matić, Dejan. 2015. Information Structure in Linguistics. In James D. Wright (ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral Sciences, Volume 12, 2nd edn., 95–99. Elsevier: Amsterdam. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson. 1994. Unattached NPs in English conversation. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 20. 402–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language 50(4). 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language: An introduction to the study of speech. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Interaction and grammar, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2015. Sentences and clauses – from the perspective of Interactional Linguistics. In Christa Dürscheid & Jan Georg Schneider (eds.), Handbuch Satz, Äußerung, Schema, 180–204. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneddon, James N. 2006. Colloquial Jakartan Indonesian. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sneddon, James N., Alexander Adelaar, Dwi N. Djenar & Michael C. Ewing. 2010. Indonesian: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stassen, Leon. 1997. Intransitive Predication. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2005. The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction. Discourse Studies 7(4–5). 481–505. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., Barbara A. Fox & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen. 2015. Grammar in everyday talk: Building responsive actions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolff, John U. 1986. Formal Indonesian, 2nd edn. Ithaca: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wouk, Fay. 1984. Scalar transitivity and trigger choice in Toba Batak. In Paul Schachter (ed.), Studies in the structure of Toba Batak, 195–219. Los Angeles: UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Dialect contact and koineization in Jakarta, Indonesia. Language Sciences 21(1). 61–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue