Cover not available

In:Diachronic Treebanks for Historical Linguistics
Edited by Hanne Martine Eckhoff, Silvia Luraghi and Marco Passarotti
[Benjamins Current Topics 113] 2020
► pp. 129–148

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Spoken Latin behind written texts

Formulaicity and salience in medieval documentary texts

 | University of Oslo
Published online: 28 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.113.05kor
Abstract
This study uses treebanking to investigate how spoken language infiltrated legal Latin in early medieval Italy. The documents used are always formulaic, but they also always contain a ‘free’ part where the case in question is described in free prose. This paper uses this difference to measure how ten linguistic features, representative of the evolution that took place between Classical and Late Latin, are distributed between the formulaic and free parts. Some variants are attested equally often in both parts of the documents, while perceptually or conceptually salient variants appear to be preserved in their conservative form mainly in the formulaic parts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and objectives
  • 2.Data
  • 3.Formulaicity
  • 4.Theoretical background and research setting
  • 5.Linguistic features
  • 6.Results and their interpretation
    • 6.1Formulaicity and salience
    • 6.2Analysis of the morphological and syntactic features
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (32)
References
Adams, James Noel. 2013. Social variation and the Latin language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamman, David, Marco Passarotti, Gregory Crane & Savine Raynaud. 2007. Guidelines for the syntactic annotation of Latin treebanks (v. 1.3). [URL] (3 June, 2017.)
Bartoli Langeli, Attilio. 2006. Notai: scrivere documenti nell’Italia medievale. Roma: Viella.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Black, Robert. 2001. Humanism and Education in Medieval and Renaissance Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broccias, Cristiano. 2012. The syntax-lexicon continuum. In Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds.), The Oxford handbook of the history of English, 735–747. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chiarcos, Christian, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski. 2011. Introduction: Salience in linguistics and beyond. In Christian Chiarcos, Berry Claus & Michael Grabski (eds.), Salience: Multidisciplinary perspectives on its function in discourse, 1–28. Berlin: Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cintrón-Valentín, Myrna C. & Nick C. Ellis. 2016. Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7. 1284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi C. & Marina K. Burt. 1973. Should we teach children syntax? Language Learning 23. 245–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldschneider, Jennifer M. & Robert M. DeKeyser. 2001. Explaining the ‘natural order of l2 morpheme acquisition’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning 51. 1–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guyotjeannin, Olivier, Jacques Pycke & Benoît-Michel Tock. 1993. Diplomatique médiévale. Paris: Brepols.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo. 2016. Subject case in the Latin of Tuscan charters of the 8th and 9th centuries. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo & Matti Lassila. 2013. Abbreviations, fragmentary words, formulaic language: Treebanking medieval charter material. In Francesco Mambrini, Marco Passarotti & Caroline Sporleder (eds.), Proceedings of the third workshop on annotation of corpora for research in the humanities, 61–72. Sofia: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korkiakangas, Timo & Marco Passarotti. 2011. Challenges in annotating Medieval Latin charters. Journal of Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26. 103–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1962. Romanische Sprachwissenschaft, II: Formenlehre. Berlin: Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2012. From Latin to Romance: Morphosyntactic typology and change. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Late Latin Charter TreebankLLCT = Late Latin Charter Treebank. Available in pml.xml format at: Cite to nonCR doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1197357
MacKenzie, Ian & Martin A. Kayman (eds.). 2018. Formulaicity and creativity in language and literature. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin. 1996. On the Romance inflectional endings i and e . Romance Philology 50. 147–182.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabatini, Francesco. 1965. Esigenze di realismo e dislocazione morfologica in testi preromanzi. Rivista di Cultura Classica e Medievale 7. 972–998.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sairio, Anni & Minna Palander-Collin. 2012. The reconstruction of prestige patterns in language history. In Juan Manuel Hernández-Campoy & Juan Camilo Conde-Silvestre (eds.), The handbook of historical sociolinguistics, 626–638. Chichester: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo. 2011. Morphosyntactic persistence. In Adam Ledgeway, Martin Maiden & John C. Smith (eds.), The Cambridge history of the Romance languages, vol. 1: Structures, 318–381. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, Luigi. 1933. Note diplomatiche sulle carte longobarde II: Tracce di antichi formulari nelle carte longobarde. Archivio Storico Italiano 19. 3–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sornicola, Rosanna. 2012. Bilinguismo e diglossia dei territori bizantini e longobardi del Mezzogiorno: le testimonianze dei documenti del IX e X secolo. Quaderni dell’Accademia Pontaniana 59. 1–102.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Väänänen, Veikko. 1981. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valentini, Cecilia. 2017. L’evoluzione della codifica del genitivo dal tipo sintetico al tipo analitico nelle carte del Codice diplomatico longobardo. Firenze: Università degli Studi di Firenze dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weber, Shirley Howard. 1924. Anthimus, De observatio[ne] ciborum: Text, commentary, and glossary, with a study of the Latinity. Leiden: Late E.J. Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Roger. 1991. The conceptual distinction between Latin and Romance: Invention or evolution. In Roger Wright (ed.), Latin and the Romance languages in the Early Middle Ages, 103–113. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamboni, Alberto. 2000. Alle origini dell’italiano: dinamiche e tipologie della transizione dal latino. Roma: Carocci.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zobl, Helmut & Juana Liceras. 1994. Functional categories and acquisition orders. Language Learning 44. 169–180. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue