In:Teacher Development for Immersion and Content-Based Instruction
Edited by Laurent Cammarata and T.J. Ó Ceallaigh
[Benjamins Current Topics 110] 2020
► pp. 11–39
Becoming a “language-aware” content teacher
Content and language integrated learning (CLIL) teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic, and dialogic process
Published online: 17 September 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.110.jicb.17009.he
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.110.jicb.17009.he
Abstract
Building on and extending the frameworks of Teacher Language Awareness (TLA) in
second/foreign language education and content-based/CLIL education (Andrews, 2007; Andrews & Lin, 2017; Lindahl & Watkins, 2015), this chapter argues that
effective teaching of academic content in an L2 requires a special kind of
teacher knowledge that goes beyond simple addition of content knowledge and
Knowledge About Language (KAL). Through an ethnographic case study, the
researchers investigated the development of a science teacher’s TLA and teacher
identity through her participation in a school-university collaborative project.
Based on analysis of data from classroom observations, interviews, and lesson
video stimulated commentaries, the researchers have developed a model focusing
on CLIL teacher professional development as a collaborative, dynamic and
dialogic process, where both teachers and teacher educators (TEs) are
co-developing their knowledge and expertise in CLIL.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.CLIL TLA development in boundary-crossing communities of practice (COP)
- 3.Research design
- 3.1Context of the study
- 3.2Data collection and analysis
- 4.Findings
- 4.1Pre-collaboration stage: A content teacher and science language user
- 4.2Early collaboration: A content teacher and language analyst
- 4.3Mid-term collaborations: A CLIL teacher with emerging TLA
- 4.4Later collaborations: A CLIL teacher with advanced TLA
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion: A lens for conceptualising CLIL teacher education as a collaborative, dynamic, and dialogic process (CDDP)
Notes References
References (29)
Andrews, S. J., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2017). Language
awareness and teacher
development. In Peter Garrett & Josep Maria Cots (Eds.), The
Routledge Handbook of Language
Awareness (pp. 57–74). London: Routledge.
Andrews, S. J., & Svalberg, A. M-L. (2017). Teacher
language
awareness. In J. Cenoz, D. Gorter, & S. May (Eds.), Language
awareness and
multilingualism (pp. 219–231). Dordrecht: Springer.
Banegas, D. L. (2012). Integrating
content and language in English language teaching in secondary education:
Models, benefits, and challenges. Studies in
Second Language Learning and
Teaching, 2(1), 111–136.
Borg, S. (2011). The
impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’
beliefs. System, 39(3), 370–380.
Cammarata, L. (2009). Negotiating
curricular transitions: Foreign language teachers’ learning experience with
content-based instruction. The Canadian
Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des la Langues
Vivantes, 65(4), 559–585.
Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1987). Teachers’
personal knowledge: What counts as personal in studies of the
personal. Journal of Curriculum
Studies, 19, 487–500.
Edge, J. (1988). Applying
linguistics in English language teacher training for speakers of other
languages. ELT
Journal, 42(1), 9–13.
Freeman, D., Katz, A., Gomez, P. G., & Burns, A. (2015). English-for-Teaching:
Rethinking teacher proficiency in the
classroom. ELT
Journal, 69(2), 129–139.
Lin, A. M. Y. (2016). Language
across the curriculum and CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL)
contexts: Theory and
practice. Singapore: Springer.
Lindahl, K. M. (2013). Exploring
an invisible medium: Teacher language awareness among pre-service educators
of English language learners (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Utah.
Lindahl, K. M., & Baecher, L. (2016). Teacher
language awareness in supervisory feedback
cycles. ELT
Journal, 70(1), 28–38.
Lindahl, K. M., Baecher, L., & Tomas, Z. (2013). Teacher
language awareness in content-based activity
design. Journal of Immersion and
Content-Based
Language, 1(2), 198–225.
Lindahl, K. M., & Watkins, N. M. (2015). Creating
a culture of language awareness in content-based
contexts. TESOL
Journal, 6(4), 777–789.
Lyster, R., & Ballinger, S. (2011). Content-based
language teaching: Convergent concerns across divergent
contexts. Language Teaching
Research, 15(3), 279–288.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative
research and case study applications in
Education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative
data analysis: An expanded
sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning
to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney
School. Sheffield, UK: Equinox.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge
and teaching: Foundations of the new
reform. Harvard Educational
Review, 57(1), 1–23.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding
expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language
teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Law, D. Y. K. (2007). Learning
as boundary-crossing in school-university
partnership. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 23(8), 1289–1301.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2011). Teacher
education and teacher
development. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook
of research in second language teaching and
learning (Vol. II, pp. 21–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities
of Practice: Learning, meaning and
identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2004). Communities
of practice: A brief introduction. <[URL]> (7 February, 2018).
Wright, T. (2002). Doing
language awareness: Issues for language study in language teacher
education. In H. Trappes-Lomax & G. Ferguson (Eds.). Language
in language teacher
education (pp. 113–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
