Cover not available

In:Approaches to Learning, Testing and Researching L2 Vocabulary
Edited by Stuart Webb
[Benjamins Current Topics 109] 2020
► pp. 45–72

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

A Hard Science Spoken Word List

 | University of Leeds
Published online: 6 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.109.itl.00006.dan
Abstract
A Hard Science Spoken Word List (HSWL) was developed and validated to help second language learners of hard sciences better comprehend academic speech at English-medium universities. It consists of the 1,595 most frequent and wide ranging word families in a 6.5-million running word hard science spoken corpus which represents 12 subjects across two equally-sized sub-corpora. Its coverage in different discourse types indicates that the HSWL truly reflects the language in hard science academic speech. The comparison between the HSWL with Dang, Coxhead, and Webb’s (2017) Academic Spoken Word List shows that the HSWL focuses more on specialized vocabulary in hard science speech. Depending on their vocabulary levels, learners may achieve 93%–96% coverage of hard science academic speech with knowledge of the HSWL words.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • 1.1Why do we need a specialized spoken wordlist for hard science students?
    • 1.2How are existing wordlists for hard science students adaptable to learners’ proficiency?
    • 1.3Research questions
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Developing the corpora
    • 2.2Determining the unit of counting for the HSWL
    • 2.3Developing and validating the HSWL
    • 2.4Determining the potential coverage for different groups of learners
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1The HSWL is a useful resource for hard science students
    • 4.2Wordlists should suit the context
    • 4.3Model of learning sequence for EAP learners
  • 5.Limitations and future research
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (65)
References
Basturkmen, H. (2003). Specificity and ESP course design. RELC Journal, 34(1), 48–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, L., & Nation, P. (1993). Word families. International Journal of Lexicography, 6(4), 253–279. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories. Bristol: The Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker, A. (2016). L2 students’ performance on listening comprehension items targeting local and global information. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Reppen, R., Schnur, E., & Ghanem, R. (2016). On the (non)utility of Juilland’s D to measure lexical dispersion in large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(4), 439–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biglan, A. (1973a). Relationships between subject matter characteristics and the structure and output of university departments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57(3), 204–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973b). The characteristics of subject matter in academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology, (57), 195–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Browne, C., Culligan, B., & Phillips, J. (n.d.). A new academic word list. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Chung, T. M., & Nation, P. (2004). Identifying technical vocabulary. System, 32(2), 251–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A., & Hirsh, D. (2007). A pilot science word list for EAP. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliqueé, XII, 2, 65–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, S., Salsbury, T., & McNamara, D. (2010). The development of polysemy and frequency use in English Second Language speakers. Language Learning, 60(3), 573–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., Coxhead, A., & Webb, S. (2017). The academic spoken word list. Language Learning, 67(4), 959–997. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dang, T. N. Y., & Webb, S. (2014). The lexical profile of academic spoken English. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 66–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Making an essential word list. In I. S. P. Nation (Ed.), Making and using word lists for language learning and testing (pp. 153–167). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D. (2007). Validating the construct of word in applied corpus-based vocabulary research: A critical survey. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 241–265. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heatley, A., Nation, I. S. P., & Coxhead, A. (2002). Range: A program for the analysis of vocabulary in texts. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Henriksen, B., & Danelund, L. (2015). Studies of Danish L2 learners’ vocabulary knowledge and the lexical richness of their written production in English. In P. Pietilä, K. Doró, & R. Pipalová (Eds.), Lexical issues in L2 writing (pp. 1–27). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, W. (2011). The vocabulary thresholds of business textbooks and business research articles for EFL learners. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 247–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsu, W. (2013). Bridging the vocabulary gap for EFL medical undergraduates: The establishment of a medical word list. Language Teaching Research, 17(4), 454–484. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2014). Measuring the vocabulary load of engineering textbooks for EFL undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 33, 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2016). General and specific EAP. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 17–29). London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2007). Is there an “academic vocabulary”? TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 235–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, W. A. (2011). Variation among academic disciplines: An update on analytical frameworks and research. The Journal of the Professoriate, 6(1), 9–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juilland, A. G., & Chang-Rodrigues, E. (1964). Frequency dictionary of Spanish words. London: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kobeleva, P. P. (2012). Second language listening and unfamiliar proper names: Comprehension barrier? RELC, 43(1), 83–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolb, D. A. (1981). Learning styles and disciplinary differences. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 232–255). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Laurén & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special language: From humans thinking to thinking machines (pp. 316–323). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2016). A new medical academic word list: A corpus-based study with enhanced methodology. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 42–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, M., Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). The real thing?: Authenticity and academic listening. English for Specific Purposes, 19(3), 253–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthews, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Recognition of high frequency words from speech as a predictor of L2 listening comprehension. System, 52, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2009). Measuring second language vocabulary acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mochizuki, M., & Aizawa, K. (2000). An affix acquisition order for EFL learners: An exploratory study. System, 28(2), 291–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mulligan, D., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2000). How much do they understand? Lectures, students and comprehension. Higher Education Research & Development, 19(3), 311–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. Retrieved from <[URL]>
(2013). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (1997). Vocabulary size, text coverage, and word lists. In N. Schmitt & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 6–19). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, I. S. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Researching and analyzing vocabulary. Boston, MA: Heinle, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nation, P., & Crabbe, D. (1991). A survival language learning syllabus for foreign travel. System, 19(3), 191–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, H. (2002). An English Spoken Academic Word List. In A. Braasch & C. Povlsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth EURALEX International Congress (Vol. 1, pp. 351–358). Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, R. (2001). Disciplinary differences and university teaching. Studies in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, R., Parry, S., & Becher, T. (2002). Teaching and learning in their disciplinary contexts: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education, 27(4), 405–417. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. M. H., & Webb, S. (2017). Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research, 21(3), 298–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodgers, M. P. H., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. TESOL Quarterly, 45(4), 689–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The percentage of words known in a text and reading comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 26–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Zimmerman, C. B. (2002). Derivative word forms: What do learners know? TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 145–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An Academic Formulas List: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valipouri, L., & Nassaji, H. (2013). A corpus-based study of academic vocabulary in chemistry research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 248–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Lexical coverage in L1 and L2 listening comprehension: The same or different from reading comprehension? Applied Linguistics, 34(4), 457–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, J., Liang, S., & Ge, G. (2008). Establishment of a Medical Academic Word List. English for Specific Purposes, 27(4), 442–458. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, J. (1999). How large a vocabulary do EAP engineering students need? Reading in a Foreign Language, 12(2), 309–323.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ward, J. (2009). A basic engineering English word list for less proficient foundation engineering undergraduates. English for Specific Purposes, 28(3), 170–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson-Todd, R. (2017). An opaque engineering word list: Which words should a teacher focus on? English for Specific Purposes, 45, 31–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Chang, A. C. -S. (2012). Second language vocabulary growth. RELC Journal, 43(1), 113–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Paribakht, T. S. (2015). What is the relationship between the lexical profile of test items and performance on a standardized English proficiency test? English for Specific Purposes, 38, 34–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009a). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 407–427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009b). Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning, 59(2), 335–366. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue