In:(Im)politeness and Moral Order in Online Interactions
Edited by Chaoqun Xie
[Benjamins Current Topics 107] 2020
► pp. 149–173
The meta-conventionalisation and moral order of e-practices
A Japanese case study
Published online: 4 June 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.107.ip.00016.kad
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.107.ip.00016.kad
This study overviews the phenomenon of the meta-conventionalisation of interpersonal practices in the context of computer-mediated communication. The term ‘meta-conventionalisation’ refers to the coding of the conventional interpersonal practices of a particular group, or various groups, in the form of entertainment as films and novels. The word ‘meta’ refers to the fact that such pieces of artwork narrate a set of conventional practices from a quasi-observer point of view, without involving their audience in these practices as language users – in this sense they are different from good practice guides (typically described as ‘netiquette, in the context of e-pragmatics), which assume that readers will internalise the practices they describe. Meta-conventionalisation has been an understudied phenomenon, in spite of representing an important aspect of our daily lives. We illustrate how this phenomenon operates by examining a Japanese case study: a popular novel which features the online interactions of a group of otaku, that is, asocial young people who lock themselves up and interact in highly specific ways.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: Previous research on meta-conventionalisation & Japanese e-language, and the data studied
- 2.1Meta-conventionalisation
- 2.2Research on Japanese e-language
- 2.3Data
- 3.Analysis
- 4.Concluding remarks
Acknowledgements Notes References Appendix
References (50)
Aida, Miho. 2005. “Otaku o meguru gensetsu no kousei: 1983nen-2005nen sabu karuchaa shi.” [Constituents of remarks on otaku: History of sub-culture 1983–2005]. Hiroshima Shudai Ronshu 46: 17–58.
Bucholtz, Mary. 1999. “‘Why to be normal?’: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls.” Language in Society 28(2): 203–223.
Calhoun, Cheshire. 2009. “What good is commitment?” Ethics: An International Journal of Social, Political, and Legal Philosophy 119(4): 613–641.
Cook, Haruko. 2008. Socializing Identities through Speech Styles: Learners of Japanese as a Foreign Language. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2010. “Conventionalised impoliteness formulae.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 3232–3245.
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Jane Demmen. 2011. “Nineteenth century English politeness: Negative politeness, conventional indirect requests and the rise of
the individual self.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 12(1/2): 49–81.
Danet, Brenda, Susan C. Herring. 2007. “Introduction: Welcome to the multilingual Internet.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 3–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2010. “A genre approach to the study of im-politeness.” International Review of Pragmatics 2(1): 46–94.
Graham, Sage Lambert. 2008. “A manual for (im)politeness?: The impact of the FAQ in an electronic community of practice.” In Impoliteness in Language: Studies on Its Interplay with Power in Theory and Practice, ed. by Derek Bousfield, and Miriam A. Locher, 281–304. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hirai, Tomohisa. 2007. “channeru no komyunikeeshon ni kansuru kousatsu: intaa netto to senron keisei ni kansuru giron
e no hihan.” [Communication in ‘2 Channel’: A critical approach to the internet and public opinion
arguments]. Media Communication 57: 163–174.
Holt, Richard. 2004. Dialogue on the Internet: Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-mediated Communication. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood.
Hung, David W. L., and Maich Nichani. 2000. “Constructivism and e-learning: Balancing between the individual and social levels of
cognition.” In New ‘Literacies’: Educational Response to a Knowledge-based Society: Proceedings of the ERA-AME-AMIC Joint
Conference 2000, ed. by Jessie Ee, Berinderjeet Kaur, Ngan Hoe Lee, and Yeap Ban Har, 144–150. Singapore: Educational Research Association.
Inoue, Ippei. 2006. “Netto shakai no wakamono kotoba.” [Youth language in network society]. Gengo [Language] 35(3): 60–67.
2014. “Courtesy and politeness in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight
.” Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: The Journal of Adam Mickiewicz University 49(3): 5–28.
Kádár, Dániel Z. 2013. Relational Rituals and Communication: Ritual Interaction in Groups. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
2017. Politeness, Impoliteness and Ritual: Maintaining the Moral Order in Interpersonal Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
forthcoming. The Language of Ritual. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Marcel Bax. 2013. “In-group ritual and relational work.” Journal of Pragmatics 58: 73–86.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Michael Haugh. 2013. Understanding Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, Dániel Z., Michael Haugh, and Melody Wei-Lin Chang. 2013. “Aggression and perceived national face threats in Mainland Chinese and Taiwanese discussion
boards.” Multilingua 32(3): 343–372.
Katsuno, Hirofumi, and Christine Yano. 2007. “Kaomoji and expressivity in a Japanese housewives’ chat room.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 278–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locher, Miriam. A. 2010. “Introduction: Politeness and impoliteness in computer-mediated communication.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 1–5.
Marsden, Liz, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “The pragmatics of mimesis: A case study of intercultural email communication.” FLEKS: The Scandinavian Journal of Intercultural Theory and Practice 4(1): 1–29.
McIntosh, Janet. 2009. “Stance and distance: Social boundaries, self-lamination, and metalinguistic anxiety in white Kenyan
narratives about African occult.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. by Alexandra Jaffe, 72–91. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Miller, Laura. 2004. “You are doing Burriko! Censoring/scrutinizing artificers of cute femininity in Japanese.” In Japanese Language, Gender, and Ideology: Cultural Models and Real People, ed. by Shigeko Okamoto, and Janet Shibamoto-Smith, 148–165. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morrow, Phillip R. 2012. “Online advice in Japanese: Giving advice in an Internet discussion board.” In Advice in Discourse, ed by. Holger Limberg, and Miriam A. Locher, 255–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nishimura, Yukiko. 2003a. “Establishing a community of practice on the internet: Linguistic behavior in online Japanese
communication.” In Proceedings of the Twenty-ninth Meeting of the Berkley Linguistics Society, ed. by Pawel M. Nowak, David Mortensen, and Corey Yoquelet, 337–348. Berkeley, CA: Berkley Linguistics Society.
. 2003b. “Linguistic innovations and interactional features of casual online communication in
Japanese.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 9(1). [URL] (accessed 17 May 2017).
. 2007. “Linguistic innovations and interactional features in Japanese BBS communication.” In The Multilingual Internet: Language, Culture and Communication Online, ed. by Brenda Danet, and Susan C. Herring, 163–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2008. “Japanese BBS websites as online communication: (Im)politeness perspectives.” Language @Internet 5. [URL] (accessed 3 March 2017).
. 2010a. “Impoliteness in Japanese BBS interactions: Observations from message exchanges in two online
communities.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 33–55.
. 2010b. “Linguistic and sociocultural studies of Japanese computer-mediated communication: A literature
review.” Toyogakuen University Kiyo 18: 329–345.
Ohta, Amy Synder. 1999. “Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of
Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 31(11): 1493–1512.
Okamoto, Shigeko. 2016. “Variability
and multiplicity in the meanings of stereotpyical gendered speech in Japanese.” East
Asian
Pragmatics 1(1): 5–37.
Okamoto, Takeshi. 2014. “Otaku tourism and the anime pilgrimage in Japan.” Japan Forum 27(1): 12–36.
Paternoster, Annick. 2015. Cortesi e scortesi. Percorsi di pragmatica storica da Castiglione a Collodi [Courtesy and Rudeness: Paths of Historical Pragmatics from Castiglione to Collodi]. Rome: Carocci.
Pérez-Sabater, Carmen. 2012. “The linguistics of social networking: A study of writing conventions of Facebook.” Linguistik Online 56(6). [URL] (accessed 12 September 2017).
Planchenault, Gaëlle. 2010. “Virtual community and politeness: The use of female markers identity and solidarity in a
transvestites’ website.” Journal of Politeness Research 6(1): 83–104.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2016. “The bases of (im)politeness evaluations: Culture, the moral order and the East-West debate.” East Asian Pragmatics 1(1): 73–106.
Terkourafi, Marina. 2001. “Politeness in Cypriot Greek: A frame-based approach.” Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.
Terkourafi, Marina, and Dániel Z. Kádár. 2017. “Convention and ritual (im)politeness.” The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 171–195. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Tobin, Joseph. 1998. “An
American otaku (or a boy’s virtual life on the
net).” In Digital Diversions: Youth Culture in the Age of
Multimedia, ed. by Julian Sefton-Green, 106–127. London: University College of London Press.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
