Cover not available

In:Translation Practice in the Field: Current research on socio-cognitive processes
Edited by Hanna Risku, Regina Rogl and Jelena Milosevic
[Benjamins Current Topics 105] 2019
► pp. 25–41

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

“It was on my mind all day”

Literary translators working from home – some implications of workplace dynamics

 | University of Vienna
Published online: 7 August 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.105.02kol
Abstract
This paper explores authentically situated translation processes of literary translators, based on an empirical study of five professional German literary translators translating a short story by Ernest Hemingway. It focuses on macro-level workplace dynamics: How do translators working from home organize their task? With whom do they interact? Situational factors will emerge as constitutive elements of translatorial cognition and action, and it will be shown how the fragmentation of the translation process and the blurring of boundaries between the professional and personal spheres of life significantly impact the emergence of the translator’s voice and the translation product.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Study design
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Material for translation
    • 2.3Tools and production of data
    • 2.4Nature of data
  • 3.Outline of task organization
    • 3.1Timelines and sessions
    • 3.2Phases
    • 3.3Fragmentation of the translation process
    • 3.4Hybridity of the translator’s voice
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
References (39)
References
Alves, Fabio. 2015. “Translation Process Research at the Interface.” In Psycholinguistic and Cognitive Inquiries into Translation and Interpreting, edited by A. Ferreira, and J. W. Schwieter, 17–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alvstad, Cecilia, and Alexandra Assis Rosa. 2015a. “Voice in Retranslation. An Overview and Some Trends.” Target 27 (1): 3–24. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, eds. 2015b. Voice in Retranslation. Special Issue, Target 27 (1). .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, edited by J. G. Richardson, 241–258. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buzelin, Hélène. 2005. “Unexpected Allies. How Latour’s Network Theory Could Complement Bourdieusian Analyses in Translation Studies.” The Translator 11 (2): 193–218. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Translations ‘in the Making’.” In Constructing a Sociology of Translation, edited by M. Wolf, and A. Fukari, 135–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen. 2014. “Challenges of Translation Process Research at the Workplace.” In Minding Translation, guest edited by R. Muñoz, 355–383. Special Issue 1 of MonTI. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen, and Andrea Hunziker Heeb. 2016. “Investigating the Ergonomics of a Technologized Translation Workplace.” In Reembedding Translation Process Research, edited by R. Muñoz, 69–88. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. Anders, and Herbert A. Simon. 1993. Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fock, Holger, Martin de Haan, and Alena Lhotová. 2008. Comparative Income of Literary Translators in Europe. Brussels: CEATL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hemingway, Ernest. 1925. In Our Time. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1986. “A Very Short Story.” In The Short Stories, by Ernest Hemingway, 141–142. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermans, Theo. 2009. “The Translator’s Voice in Translated Narrative.” In Translation Studies. Critical Concepts in Linguistics, edited by M. Baker, 283–305. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jääskeläinen, Riitta. 2010. “Are All Professionals Experts? Definitions of Expertise and Reinterpretation of Research Evidence in Process Studies.” In Translation and Cognition, edited by G. M. Shreve, and E. Angelone, 213–227. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke, and Lasse Schou. 1999. “Translog Documentation.” In Probing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results, edited by G. Hansen, 151–186. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, Hanne, and Anna Wegener. 2013a. “Multiple Translatorship.” In Authorial and Editorial Voices in Translation 1 – Collaborative Relationships between Authors, Translators, and Performers, edited by H. Jansen, and A. Wegener, 1–39. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’œuvre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, eds. 2013b. Authorial and Editorial Voices in Translation 1 – Collaborative Relationships between Authors, Translators, and Performers. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’œuvre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, eds. 2013c. Authorial and Editorial Voices in Translation 2 – Editorial and Publishing Practices. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’œuvre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knight, Christopher J. 1995. The Patient Particulars: American Modernism and the Technique of Originality. Lewisburg: Associated University Presses.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolb, Waltraud. 2011. “The Making of Literary Translations: Repetition and Ambiguity in a Short Story by Ernest Hemingway.” Across Languages and Cultures 12 (2): 259–274. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “‘Who are they?’: Decision-Making in Literary Translation.” In Tracks and Treks in Translation Studies, edited by C. Way, S. Vandepitte, R. Meylaerts, and M. Bartłomiejczyk, 207–221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kußmaul, Paul. 2000. Kreatives Übersetzen [Creative Translation]. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznik, Anna, and Joan M. Verd Pericàs. 2010. “Investigating Real Work Situations in Translation Agencies. Work Content and its Components.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 44: 25–43. Accessed February 21, 2017. [URL].
Merriam Webster. 2017. “Hybrid.” Accessed March 14, 2017. [URL].
Mossop, Brian. 2000. “The Workplace Procedures of Professional Translators.” In Translation in Context, edited by A. Chesterman, N. Gallardo San Salvador, and Y. Gambier, 39–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, ed. 2016. Reembedding Translation Process Research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Brien, Sharon. 2012. “Translation as Human-Computer Interaction.” Translation Spaces 1: 101–122. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “Translation Process Research as Interaction Research: From Mental to Socio-Cognitive Processes.” In Minding Translation, guest edited by R. Muñoz, 331–353. Special Issue 1 of MonTI. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Risku, Hanna, and Angela Dickinson. 2009. “Translators as Networkers. The Role of Virtual Communities.” Hermes – Journal of Language and Communication Studies 42: 49–70. Accessed February 21, 2017. [URL].
Risku, Hanna, Florian Windhager, and Matthias Apfelthaler. 2013. “A Dynamic Network Model of Translatorial Cognition and Action.” Translation Spaces 2, 151–182. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stillinger, Jack. 1991. Multiple Authorship and the Myth of Solitary Genius. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina. 2013. “Voice in the Field of Translation Studies.” In La Traduction des voix intra-textuelles / Intratextual Voices in Translation, edited by K. Taivalkoski-Shilov, and M. Suchet, 1–9. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’œuvre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taivalkoski-Shilov, Kristiina, and Myriam Suchet, eds. 2013. La Traduction des voix intra-textuelles / Intratextual Voices in Translation. Montreal: Éditions québécoises de l’œuvre.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vorderobermeier, Gisella M. 2013. Translatorische Praktiken aus soziologischer Sicht [Translatorial Practices from a Sociological Perspective]. Leverkusen: Budrich UniPress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Borg, Claudine, Carmen Heine & Hanna Risku
2025. Observations and diaries. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 108 ff. DOI logo
Dorer, Brita, Anna Kuznik, David Orrego Carmona & Cornelia Zwischenberger
2025. Surveys and interviews. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo
Bednárová-Gibová, Klaudia & Mária Majherová
2021. Academic literary translators: a happy ‘elite’ or not?. The Translator 27:2 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Kolb, Waltraud
2021. “Hemingway’s priorities were just different”. In Literary Translator Studies [Benjamins Translation Library, 156], ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue