In:Storytelling in the Digital World
Edited by Anna De Fina and Sabina M. Perrino
[Benjamins Current Topics 104] 2019
► pp. 105–127
Sharing the moment as small stories
The interplay between practices & affordances in the social media-curation of lives
Published online: 18 June 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.104.06geo
https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.104.06geo
Abstract
Sharing the moment live, a built-in logic of many social networking sites, is, I claim, an invitation for creating plots, which has led to systematic practices. I single out taking a narrative stance on Facebook as such a practice and show the interplay between key-norms and evolving media affordances for pre-selection of story ingredients, localization, visualization of the experience, and audience selection. These contribute to showing the moment as opposed to telling it, with selected friends serving as knowing co-narrators and with story-linking allowing for allusive, transmedia links. I review these practices in the context of increased story facilities that notably bring together several social media apps. I argue that although this curation promises a move beyond the moment, it ultimately serves to consolidate sharing-lives-in-the-moment. I reflect on the implications of this for the direction of travel in relation to stories on many social media platforms.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Small stories for a narrative analysis of sharing the moment
- Data and methods: Sharing the moment on social media
- Facebook data: Status updates & selfies
- Paratexts
- Analysis: Taking a narrative stance as a systematic practice for sharing the moment
- Evolving affordances for taking a narrative stance
- Pre-selection for story “ingredients”
- Visual narrative stancetaking
- Shared selfies, knowing friends and co-narration
- Taking a narrative stance and story-linking
- Discussion: Taking a narrative stance in the context of designing ‘Stories’
- Concluding reflections: The normativity of sharing lives-in-the-moment
Notes References Appendix
References (36)
boyd, d. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (Ed.), Networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites (pp. 39–58). New York: Routledge.
Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society, 11, 985–1002.
Bell, A. (2001). “Back in style: Reworking audience design”. In Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. R. (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 139–168). Cambridge: CUP.
Berry, D. M. (2011). The philosophy of software: Code and mediation in the digital age. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bolter, D. J., & Grusin, R. (1998). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14, 1164–1180.
Constine, J. (2016). Instagram launches ‘stories’, a snapchatty feature for imperfect sharing. [URL]
Cooper, S. (2016). Snapchat versus instagram: The war of the stories. [URL]
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2012). Analyzing narrative: Discourse and sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: CUP.
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small stories, interaction and identities. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
(2013a). Storytelling on the go: Breaking news stories as a travelling narrative genre. In Hatavara, M., Hydén, L-C. & Hyvärinen, Matti (Eds.), The travelling concepts of narrative, (pp. 201–224). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
(2013b). Small stories research as a framework for the study of social media practices: Narrative stancetaking and circulation in a Greek news story. Sociolinguistica, 27, 19–36.
(2014). Small stories transposition & social media: A micro-perspective on the ‘Greek crisis’. Discourse & Society, 25, 519–539.
(2015). Sharing as rescripting. Place manipulations on YouTube between narrative and social media affordances. Discourse, Context & Media, 9, 64–72.
(2016a). From writing the self to posting self(ies): A small stories approach to selfies. Open Linguistics, 2, 300–317.
(2016b). Friendly comments: Interactional displays of alignment on Facebook and YouTube. In Leppänen, S., Kytölä, S. & Westinen, E. (Eds.), Discourse and identification: diversity and heterogeneity in social media practices (pp. 178–207). London: Routledge.
Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The Like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media & Society, 15, 1348–13645.
Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, NJ: Elrbaum. 127–143.
Hine, C., Kendall, L., & boyd, d. (2009). Question one: How can qualitative internet researchers define the boundaries of their projects? In Markham, A. N. & Baym, N. K. (Eds.), Internet inquiry: Conversations about method (pp. 1–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Jefferson, G. (1978). Sequential aspects of storytelling in conversation. In Schenkein, J. (Ed.), Studies in the organisation of conversational interaction (pp. 219–249). New York: Academic Press.
Jones, R. H. (2016). Surveillance. In Georgakopoulou, A. & Spilloti, T. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of language and digital communication (pp. 408–411). London: Routledge.
Kaun, A., & Stiernstedt, F. (2014). Facebook time: Technological and institutional affordances for media memories. New Media & Society, 16, 1154–1168.
Markham, A. N. (2013). Remix culture, remix methods: Reframing qualitative inquiry for social media contexts. In Denzin, N. & Giardina, M. (Eds.), Global dimensions of qualitative inquiry (pp. 63–81). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Page, R., Harper, R., & Frobenius, M. (2013). From small stories to networked narrative. The evolution of personal narratives in Facebook status updates. Narrative Inquiry, 23, 192–213.
Van Dijck, J. (2013). You have one identity: Performing the self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture and Society, 35, 199–215.
Wesch, M. (2008). Context collapse. [URL]. Last accessed 1/4/2017.
Zhang, L. (2010). What’s on your mind? [URL]
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Tham, Aaron, Shu-Hsiang (Ava) Chen & Levi Durbidge
Towner, Terri L. & Caroline L. Muñoz
Le Viet-Błaszczyk, Milena
De Fina, Anna
2021. Doing narrative analysis from a narratives-as-practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry 31:1 ► pp. 49 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
