Cover not available

Article published In: Babel
Vol. 62:3 (2016) ► pp.456–469

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Definiteness and the meaning reconstruction in English – Chinese translation

Published online: 29 November 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.62.3.05zha
Discourse analysis has drawn people’s attention to micro levels in the discourse. This means that some subtle issues that were ignored in the past may carry with them some implicit meanings when looked at in the context. In this regard, topicality in Chinese usually indicates definiteness, whereas this definiteness is signaled by articles, pronouns in English texts. The difference between the two systems can result in problems in translation if not handled properly. Therefore it should be stressed that the management of theme-rheme structures should be dealt with much care from micro text levels, along with an interpretation of the macro intention of the text, so that the translation process should be highlighted. By incorporating the model of discourse analysis, the interaction between the original and translation can be realized.
References (15)
Baker, Mona. 1992. In other words: A Coursebook on Translation. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Roger. 1991. Translation and Translating: Theory and Practice. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berman, Antoine. 2000. “Translation and the Trials of the Foreign” (transl. by Lawrence Venuti). In The Translation Studies Reader, ed. by Lawrence Venuti, 240–249. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W.L. 1976. “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics, and Point of View”. In Subject and Topic, ed. by C.N. Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, M. 1991. Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munday, Jermy. 2001. Introducing Translation Studies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason. 1990. Discourse and the Translator. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko (いけがみ よしひこ). 1998. 詩学と文化記号論 (Poetics and Cultural Semiotics). Nanjing: Yilin Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qu, Chengxi (屈承熹). 2005. 漢語認知功能語法 (A Cognitive Functional Grammar of Chinese). Haerbin: Heilongjiang People Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsao, Feng-fu. 1979. A Functional Study of Topic in Chinese: The First Step Towards Discourse Analysis. Taipei: Students Book Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, Liejiong, and Danqing Liu (徐烈炯、劉丹青). 1998. 話題的結構與功能 (Structure and Function of the Topic). Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Education Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhu, Chunshen (朱純深). 2003. 句子功能內外觀：論句子作為關鍵功能單位及其文本責任 (A Functional Perspective of Sentence: On the Sentence as a Key Translation Unit and its Textual Accountability). In New Focuses of Translation Studies, ed. by Liu Jingzhi, 161–208. Hong Kong: Commercial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(朱純深). 2001. 翻譯探微：語言·文本·詩學 (Translation Studies: Language, Text and Poetics). Taiwan: Shulin Publishing House Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue