Cover not available

Article published In: Babel
Vol. 70:3 (2024) ► pp.305–333

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Apport de la littératie informationnelle et multimodale dans la pratique traductive

 | Korea UniversitySéoul
 | Chungbuk National University

Article language: French

Published online: 11 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00387.jea
Résumé
La profusion des sources à disposition des traducteurs (outils d’aide à la traduction: corpus monolingues ou parallèles en ligne, bases terminologiques, mémoires de traduction, etc.) et à la rédaction démultiplie et complexifie le processus de traduction. Ainsi, pour une meilleure gestion de ressources de plus en plus hétérogènes, et des procédures liées à leur exploitation, nous montrons comment nos cours de traduction ont profité de la rédaction méthodique de journaux de progression, présentés en classe à l’oral (mutualisés et commentés en ligne, par l’enseignant et les autres élèves), consignant leurs pratiques réflexives sur leur cheminement méthodique, d’abord individuels, puis co-construits, mutualisés et commentés sur une plateforme collaborative. La littératie informationnelle mais aussi multimodale (croquis explicatifs, adaptation cinématographique d’une œuvre littéraire, recherche par images) se révèle essentielle tant en traduction audiovisuelle que littéraire, en particulier pour traduire l’intertextualité, l’interculturel et l’implicite.
Abstract
There are abundant resources available to translators, such as online monolingual or parallel corpora, terminology and translation databases, and various tools. These resources can assist the translation process, but they can also introduce disruptions. Therefore, this article aims to demonstrate how translation courses can benefit from systematic process logs. These logs, progressively developed and discussed orally in front of the class, can be shared and commented on online by both the teacher and other students. They serve as a record of the reflective and systematic progression of translation practices. Initially created individually, they can later be co-constructed and shared on a collaborative platform. To convey implicit, intercultural, and intertextual components, information and multimodal literacy become essential for both media and literary translation. This includes visual research, explanatory sketches, and cinematographic adaptations of literary works.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Cadre et méthodologie
    • 2.1Définition de la littératie informationnelle
    • 2.2Littératie informationnelle et formation à la traduction
    • 2.3Mise en œuvre
    • 2.4Outils et méthodologie
  • 3.Analyse des procédures informationnelles: Cas pratiques
    • 3.1En traduction littéraire
    • 3.2Traduction du sous-titrage
  • 4.Consultation des retours des étudiants
    • 4.1Outils employés
    • 4.2Vertus de la suite collaborative
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Remarques
  • Références
  • Corpus
References (33)
Références
Dagenais, Diane, et Kelleen Toohey. 2014. «La production vidéo : une pratique multimodale pour tisser des liens entre l’école et les littératies hors scolaires». Nouveaux cahiers de la recherche en éducation 17 (2): 8–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Désilets, Alain, Caroline Barrière, et Jean Quirion. 2007. Making Wikimedia Resources More Useful for Translators. [URL]
Désilets, Alain. 2007. “Translation Wikified: How will Massive Online Collaboration Impact the World of Translation?.”[URL]
EMT. 2009. “Competences for professional translators, experts in multilingual and multimedia communication.”[URL]
Díaz Cintas Jorge, et Aline Remael. 2007. Audiovisual Translation: Subtitling. Manchester: St. Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enríquez Raído, Vanessa. 2011. “Investigating the Web Search Behaviors of Translation Students: An Exploratory and Multiple-Case Study.” Ph.D. diss., Universitat Ramon Llull.
Faria Pires, Loïc. 2020. “Master’s Students’ Post-Editing Perception and Strategies”. Forum 181, 24–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Olivia. 2000. “The Use of Translation Diaries in a Process-Oriented Translation Teaching Methodology.” In Developing Translation Competence, ed. by Christina Schäffner and Beverly Adab, 115–130. Birmingham: Aston University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gile, Daniel. 1994. “The Process-Oriented Approach in Translation Training.” In Teaching Translation and Interpreting 21, ed. by Cay Dollerup and Annette Lindegaard, 107–112. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Integrated Problem and Decision Reporting as a Translator Training Tool.” JosTrans 21: 2–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, Robert. 2011. “Mobile Apps for Language Learning.” Language Learning & Technology 15 (2): 2–11. [URL]
Hurtado Albir, Amparo. 1996. “La enseñanza de la traducción directa ‘general’. Objetivos de aprendizaje y metodología.” In La Enseñanza de la Traducción, ed. by Amparo Hurtado Albir, 31–55. Castellón de la Plana: Universidad Jaume I.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey, et Gunther Kress, eds. 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jo, Byeok. 2015. “Midieo liteolasi-reul judohal Hanguk” [South Korea to lead media literacy]. Midieowa gyoyuk [Media and education] 5 (1): 7–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Katan, David. 2008. “University Training, Competencies, and the Death of the Translator: Problems in Professionalizing Translation and in the Translation Profession.” In Tradurre: Formazione e Professione, ed. by Maria T. Musacchio and Geneviève Henrot, 113–140. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuznik, Anna, and Christian Olalla-Soler. 2018. “Results of PACTE Group’s Experimental Research on Translation Competence Acquisition: The Acquisition of the Instrumental Sub-Competence.” Across Languages and Cultures 19 (1): 19–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Look, Rudy. 2016. “L’utilisation des corpus électroniques chez le traducteur professionnel : quand ? comment ? pour quoi faire ?”, ILCEA 271.[URL]
Mackey, Thomas P., and Trudi E. Jacobson. 2011. “Reframing Information Literacy as a Metaliteracy.” College & Research Libraries 72 (1): 62–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Massey, Gary, and Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow. 2011. “Investigating Information Literacy: A Growing Priority in Translation Studies.” Across Languages and Cultures 12(2): 193–211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nord, Christian. 1988. Textanalyse und Übersetzen. Theoretische Grundlagen, Methode und Didaktische Anwendung einer übersetzungsrelevanten Textanalyse. Heidelberg: J. Gross Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PACTE, 2017a. “Decision-Making.” In Researching Translation Competence by PACTE, ed. by Amparo Hurtado Albir, 191–210. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
, 2017b. “PACTE translation competence model. a holistic, dynamic model of translation competence.” In Researching Translation Competence by PACTE Group, ed. by Amparo Hurtado Albir. 35–41. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pellerin, Martine. 2014. “Language Tasks and Mobile Technologies: A Paradigm Shift in Designing Task-Based CALL for Young Language Learners.” Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology 40 (1). [URL]
. 2017. «L’usage des technologies numériques pour le développement de compétences multimodales en littératie au 21e siècle». Éducation et francophonie 45 (2): 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, María, and Dora Sales. 2008. “INFOLITRANS: A Model for the Development of Information Competence for Translators.” Journal of Documentation 64 (3): 413–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pym, Anthony. 2003. “Redefining Translation Competence in an Electronic Age: In Defense of a Minimalist Approach.” Meta 48 (4): 481–497. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero, Margareda, Benjamin Lille, et Azeneth Patiño, dir. 2017. Usages créatifs du numérique pour l’apprentissage au XXIe siècle. Québec: Presses de l’Université du Québec. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sales, Doria, María Pinto, and Andrés Fernández-Ramos. 2018. “Undressing Information Behaviour in the Field of Translation: A Case Study with Translation Trainees.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 50 (2): 186–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toohey, Kelleen, Diane Dagenais, Andreea Fodor, Linda Hof, Omar Nuñez-Mendez, Liz Schulze, et Angelpreet Singh. 2015. “That Sounds So Cool: Entanglements of Children, Digital Tools, and Literacy Practices.” TESOL Quarterly 49 (3): 461–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus
Camus, Albert. 1957. L’étranger. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godbout, Jacques. 1967. Salut Galarneau ! Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Monfils, Nadine. 2012. Le Silence des canaux. Paris: Belfond.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Astier, Alexandre, et Louis Clichy. Astérix : Le domaine des dieux. 2014.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue