Linguistics in the Netherlands 2019
At this year’s meeting, 72 papers were presented, of which 16 were submitted in writing. The present volume contains an internationally peer-reviewed selection of these papers, which present an overview of current research in a variety of fields in linguistics.
To celebrate the 50th Dutch Annual Linguistics Day, this volume also contains 11 brief opinion pieces in which several well-known Dutch linguists, from various fields and research institutes, give the reader a more personal view on how their discipline and/or their career has evolved and how they see the future of Dutch linguistics.
Published online on 5 November 2019
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Table of Contents
- Forewordp. 1
- GLOW: De eerste jaren. Een persoonlijke geschiedenisHans Bennis | pp. 2–7
- Fifty years of morphological theory in the NetherlandsGeert Booij | pp. 8–12
- The final frontier: Non-human animals on the linguistic research agendaLeonie Cornips | pp. 13–19
- TiN days and ICL weeksAd Foolen | pp. 20–26
- Fifty years of phonetic sciences in The NetherlandsVincent J. van Heuven & Toni Rietveld | pp. 27–32
- Dutch linguistics from the perspective of a historical linguist trained at Utrecht in the 1980sAns van Kemenade | pp. 33–36
- Description, linguistics 1.0. Theory, linguistics 3.0?Pieter Muysken | pp. 37–42
- Past and future of linguistics in the Netherlands: A very personal viewJan Odijk | pp. 43–48
- Dutch linguistics and the general audienceMarc van Oostendorp | pp. 49–53
- Historical linguistics in the NetherlandsNicoline van der Sijs | pp. 54–59
- 50 years of dichotomies: Misunderstandings and the relevance of lexical semanticsArie Verhagen | pp. 60–66
- Posture verbs combined with past participles in Dutch: Fixed or productive patterns?Maarten Bogaards | pp. 67–82
- Does reported speech influence listeners’ choice of perspective in the interpretation of spatial prepositions?Ariska I. Bonnema, Vera Hukker & Petra Hendriks | pp. 83–98
- On the idiomatic nature of unproductive morphologyKaren De Clercq & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd | pp. 99–114
- Changes in argument structure: The case of Dutch vernieuwenGea Dreschler | pp. 115–129
- Restrictions on “Low” person agreement in Dutch specificational copular constructionsJutta M. Hartmann & Caroline Heycock | pp. 130–146
- A filter for syntactically incomparable parallel sentencesMartin Kroon, Sjef Barbiers, Jan Odijk & Stéphanie van der Pas | pp. 147–161
- The Perfect in dialogue: Evidence from DutchBert Le Bruyn, Martijn van der Klis & Henriëtte de Swart | pp. 162–175
- Emphatic reflexives as part-structure modifiersJos Tellings | pp. 176–191
- Demonstrative-reinforcer constructions and the syntactic role of deictic featuresSilvia Terenghi | pp. 192–207
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2026. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.