Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017
Edited by Sander Lestrade and Bert Le Bruyn
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 34] 2017
► pp. 127–141
Te-raising is clitic climbing
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 23 November 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.09pot
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.09pot
Abstract
In contrast to finite verb clusters, non-finite verb clusters have thus far received little attention in the literature. In this paper, I present new data from a large-scale questionnaire study on variation in non-finite three-verb clusters in Dutch, investigating the position and presence of the infinitival marker te ‘to’. The results reveal that a group of Dutch speakers allows te to occur in a higher position than it should based on selection requirements. I propose that for these speakers te has the morphosyntactic status of a clitic, whereas for all other speakers te is a verbal prefix. I analyse Dutch verb clusters as cases of functional restructuring and te-raising as an instance of clitic climbing, a well-known phenomenon from other languages with restructuring, such as Italian.
Keywords:
te-raising, non-finite verb clusters, clitic climbing, Dutch, restructuring
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The data: The position and presence of te
- 3.Prerequisites for the analysis
- 3.1 Te in T
- 3.2 Te as clitic or prefix
- 3.3The size of the complement of Dutch modals
- 3.4Dutch verb clusters as cases of functional restructuring
- 4.The analysis
- 4.1The first cluster type
- 4.2The second cluster type
- 4.3The third cluster type
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (16)
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2009. You have the right to remain silent: The syntactic licensing of ellipsis. Ph.D. dissertation, Catholic University of Brussels.
Barbiers, Sjef, Hans Bennis, Gunther De Vogelaer, Magda Devos and Margreet van der Ham. 2005. Syntactische atlas van de Nederlandse dialecten. Deel I. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Cardinaletti, Anna and Ur Shlonsky. 2004. “Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian”. Linguistic Inquiry 351, 519–557.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2001. “”Restructuring” and the order of aspectual and root modal heads”. In G. Cinque and G. Salvi, eds., Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 137–155.
Harwood, William. 2013. Being progressive is just a phase: Dividing the functional hierarchy. Ph.D. dissertation, Ghent University.
IJbema, Aniek. 2001. Grammaticalization and Infinitival Complements in Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, Leiden University.
Miller, Philip. 1991. Clitics and constituents in phrase structure grammar. Ph.D. dissertation, Utrecht University.
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ter Beek, Janneke. 2008. Restructuring and infinitival complements in Dutch. Ph.D. dissertation, LOT Dissertation series.
Van de Velde, Freek. 2017. “Understanding grammar at the community level required a diachronic perspective. Evidence from four case studies”. Nederlandse taalkunde 221, 47–74.
