Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2017
Edited by Sander Lestrade and Bert Le Bruyn
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 34] 2017
► pp. 1–15

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Menscheln, kibbelen, sparkle

Verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon

 | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
 | Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
 | Tufts University | Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 23 November 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.01aud
Abstract
German, Dutch and English have surprisingly large sets of verbal diminutives: verbs ending in -el/-le and carrying an attenuative and/or iterative meaning. These verbs exhibit particular properties that make them interesting for morphological theory. Focussing on Dutch data, this paper sketches the challenges that arise with respect to structure, productivity and meaning, and proposes a constructionist account that allows for a better understanding of the issues. The central notion is the schema, a generalization over the structure of complex words. In contrast to rules, whose main function is to generate new words, schemas motivate existing words by marking their structure as non-arbitrary. We discuss the modelling options this gives us and apply them to the verbal diminutives.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Non-lexical bases and non-productivity
  • 3.The identity of -el and structural ambiguity
  • 4.Theoretical challenges and a constructionist account
  • 5.Partial motivation
  • 6.Multiple motivation
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (19)
References
Bauer, Laurie, Rochelle Lieber & Ingo Plag. 2013. The Oxford reference guide to English morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2010. Construction Morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Inheritance and motivation in Construction Morphology.” Defaults in Morphological Theory. ed. by N. Gisborne & A. Hippisley. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Jenny Audring. forthcoming. “Partial motivation, multiple motivation: the role of output schemas in morphology.” The construction of words, Advances in Construction Morphology. ed. by G. Booij. Dordrecht: Springer.
Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch Handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Jenny Audring. forthcoming. The texture of the lexicon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2016. “Morphological schemas: Theoretical and psycholinguistic issues.” The Mental Lexicon 11(3): 467–493. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jager, Arie de. 1875. Woordenboek der frequentatieven in het Nederlandsch. Gouda: G.B. van Goor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panther, Klaus-Uwe & Günter Radden, eds. 2011. Motivation in grammar and the lexicon. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Philippa, Marlies, Frans Debrabandere & Arend Quak. 2003. Etymologisch woordenboek van het Nederlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Radden, Günter & Klaus-Uwe Panther, eds. 2004. Studies in linguistic motivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, Ferdinand. 1916/1977. Cours de linguistique générale, ed. by C. Bally and A. Sechehaye, with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger. Lausanne and Paris: Payot; trans. by W. Baskin, Course in general linguistics, Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Moritz & Adolphe Van Loey. 1964. Schönfelds historische grammatica van het Nederlands: Klankleer, vormleer, woordvorming. Zutphen: Thieme.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2015. “Diminutive verbs in German: semantic analysis and theoretical implications.” Morphology 25(2). 183–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Smith, Chris
2025. Étude de la variation diachronique de la construction ‹have the N to › en anglais à partir du corpus COHA. Langages n° 239:3 ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Мишина, Вероника Сергеевна
2025.  Средства выражения количественной аспектуальности в английском языке . Tomsk state pedagogical university bulletin :6(242) ► pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Yalcin, Helin
2024. Deconstructing OUT-prefixation. English Text Construction 17:2 ► pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Cavirani-Pots, Cora & Engela De Villiers
2023. Univerbation in Afrikaans verbal diminutives. Linguistics in the Netherlands 40 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK & BILL THOMPSON
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Tarasova, Elizaveta & José A. Sánchez Fajardo
2020. Iconicity and word-formation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 34 ► pp. 332 ff. DOI logo
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Weiyun Wei, Yumeng Wang, Guangyuan Ren & Yunyun Ran
2020. Words are constructions, too: A construction-based approach to English ablaut reduplication. Linguistics 58:6 ► pp. 1701 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue