Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 121–134
Conditional use of prepositional phrases in Dutch
The case of zonder (‘without’)
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 21 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.09reu
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.09reu
Abstract
Conditionality can be expressed using a variety of grammatical constructions, ranging from the prototypical lexical marker if to other grammatical patterns. This corpus study investigates the expression of conditionality using prepositional phrases introduced by Dutch zonder (‘without’) compared to their non-conditional use and the use of als (‘if’). The conditional use of zonder-phrases is discussed with respect to complement type, modal marking and negation. A regression analysis was performed to analyse the contribution of these factors to a conditional interpretation.
Keywords: conditionals, prepositional phrases, modality, negation, Dutch
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Brief overview of the literature
- 2.1Classifying PPs as conditionals
- 2.2Previous observations
- 3.Data selection
- 4.Factors in the conditional use of zonder-PPs
- 4.1Complement type
- 4.2Modal marking
- 4.3Negation
- 4.4Logistic regression analysis
- 5.Conclusion and discussion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (30)
Athanasiadou, Angeliki & René Dirven. 1997. “Conditionality, hypotheticality, counterfactuality”. On conditionals again ed. by A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven, 61–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beekhuizen, Barend. 2016. “De zijnsstatus van de afhankelijke V1-constructie in het Nederlands”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 21:1; 33–59.
Broekhuis, Hans. 2013. Syntax of Dutch: Adpositions and adpositional phrases. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. “Conditionals: A typology”. On Conditionals ed. by E. Traugott, A. Meulen, J. Reilly, & C. Ferguson; 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: a comprehensive empirical analysis. Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Diepeveen, Janneke, Ronny Boogaart, Jenneke Brantjes, Pieter Byloo, Theo Janssen & Jan Nuyts. 2006. Modale uitdrukkingen in Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands. Amsterdam: Stichting Neerlandistiek VU.
Evans, Jonathan St. B.T., & Simon J. Handley. 1999. “The Role of Negation in Conditional Inference”. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 52:3; 739–769.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fortuin, Egbert & Ronny Boogaart. 2009. “Imperative as conditional: From constructional to compositional semantics”. Cognitive Linguistics 20:4; 641–673.
Gabrielatos, Constantinos. 2010. A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. Doctoral dissertation. Lancaster University.
Grondelaers, Stefan, Katrien Deygers, Hilde Van Aken, Vicky Van Den Heede & Dirk Speelman. 2000. “Het CONDIV-corpus geschreven Nederlands”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 5:4; 356–363.
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap De Rooij & Maarten Cornelis Van den Toorn. 1997. Algemene Nederlandse Spraakkunst, 2e, geheel herz. dr. Groningen, Deurne: Martinus-Nijhoff, Wolters-Plantijn.
Huddleston, Rodney Desmond & Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jespersen, Otto. 1961. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Volume V1: Syntax. London: Bradford & Dickens.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2012. Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nieuwint, Pieter. 1992. On Conditionals. A Study of Conditional Sentences in English and Dutch. Doctoral dissertation. Catholic University of Brabant.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pollmann, Tessel. 1975. “Temporele en conditionele als-zinnen: een terreinverkenning II”. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 681, 287–312.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Roch, Claudia. 2013. “Influence of modality markers on the conditional interpretation of the German preposition ohne
”. In Proceedings of the IWCS 2013 Workshop on Annotation of Modal Meanings in Natural Language (WAMM).
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1968. “A theory of conditionals”. Studies in logical theory ed. by N. Rescher, 98–112. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: The mind-body metaphor in semantic structure and semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van der Auwera, Johan. 1986. “Conditionals and Speech Acts”. On Conditionals ed. by E. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, & J. Reilly, 197–214. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Verhagen, Arie. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weijnen, Antonius A. 1964. “De structuur van de temporele laag van de voorzetselbetekenissen”. Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 801; 133–150.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. “Conditionals and counterfactuals: conceptual primitives and linguistic universals”. On conditionals again ed. by A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven, 15–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Fortuin, Egbert
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
