Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2016
Edited by Jenny Audring and Sander Lestrade
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 33] 2016
► pp. 54–69

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Deriving verb-cluster variation in Dutch and German

 | Utrecht University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 21 December 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.33.05kam
Abstract
The difference in West-Germanic V(erb)-clusters, right-branching (Dutch) and left-branching (German), follows from a difference in the acquisition of V-second. The decisive factor is a rightward selection of the <+Aux> verbs in Dutch main clauses. That decisive factor had already been acquired before any V-cluster appeared in the child’s speech. Longitudinal Dutch child data show that modals and aspectuals develop a rightward selection that carries over into the V-cluster. The German child data do not show such a development. Automatic phrasal formation by the acquisition procedure allows a V-cluster without assuming V-to-V-movement from an underlying structure. The general perspective is that (i) the acquisition procedure is a discovery procedure, and that (ii) typological effects are the outcome of early local string-determined licensing/selection.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The acquisition perspective. Two types of selection
    • 2.1The acquisition path for the root clause in Dutch and German
    • 2.2Directionality of selection: A Dutch-German input difference
    • 2.3Subordinate clauses and V-clusters
  • 3.Triple V-clusters
  • 4.The categorial status of the past participle
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • References
References (26)
References
Barbiers, Sjef, Johan van der Auwera, Hans Bennis, Eefje Boef, Gunther De Vogelaer & Margreet van der Ham. 2008. Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects, Volume 21. Amsterdam: AUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef & Hans Bennis. 2010. “De plaats van het werkwoord in zuid en noord”. Artikelen voor Magda Devos ed. by Johan De Caluwe & Jacques Van Keymeulen, 25–42. Gent: Academia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barbiers, Sjef, Hans Bennis & Lotte Hendriks. 2016. Merging verb cluster variation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Linguistic Variation, 9 February, Utrecht University.
Behrens, H. 2006. “The input-output relationship in first language acquisition”. Language and Cognitive Processes 211.2–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berg, B. van den. 1949. “De plaats van het hulpwerkwoord in de voltooide tijden in de Nederlandse bijzin”. Taal en Tongval 11.155-165.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Besten, H. den & H. Broekhuis. 1989. “Woordvolgorde in de werkwoordelijke eindreeks”. GLOT 121.79–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, Elma. 2003. From root infinitive to finite sentence. PhD diss., Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blom, E. & F. Wijnen. 2013. “Optionality of finiteness: Evidence for a no overlap stage in Dutch child language”. First language 33:3.225–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver. 2015. Syntax of Dutch. Volume 21. Amsterdam: AUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussé, E. 2006. “De historische wortels van de volgordevariatie in het hebben-perfectum”. Taal en Tongval 581.250–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter. 2014. “Constructions, complexity and word order variation”. Measuring Linguistic Complexity ed. by1 Frederick Newmeyer & Laurel Preston, 148–178. OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold E. 1975. The transformational cycle in Dutch and German. PhD diss., Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. “Verbal clusters and cluster creepers”. Verb Constructions in German and Dutch ed. by Peter Seuren & Gerard Kempen, 43–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evers, A. E. 2008. “Vraag aan de Westgermaanse dialectvergelijking”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 131.188–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evers, Arnold E. & Jacqueline van Kampen. 2008. Parameter setting and input reduction”. The Limits of Syntactic Variation ed. by Theresa Biberauer, 483-515. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freudenthal, D., J. Pine, J. Aguado-Orea & F. Gobet. 2007. “Modeling the developmental patterning of finiteness marking in English, Dutch, German, and Spanish using MOSAIC”. Cognitive Science 311.311–341.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haan, Ger de. 1987. “A theory-bound approach to the acquisition of verb placement in Dutch”. Formal Parameters of Generative Grammar III ed. by Ger de Haan & Wim Zonneveld, 15–30. Utrecht: OTS.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric. 2016. “Combining with to-infinitives”. Taalportaal. [URL].
Jordens, P. 2002. “Finiteness in early child Dutch”. Linguistics 401.687–765. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampen, Jacqueline van. 1997. First steps in wh-movement. PhD diss. Utrecht University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampen, J. van. 2009. “The non-biological evolution of grammar: Wh-question formation in Germanic”. Biolinguistics 31.154-185. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, C. & F. Weerman (in press) “Cracking the cluster. The acquisition of verb raising in Dutch”. Nederlandse Taalkunde.
Salustri, Manola & Nina Hyams. 2006. “Looking for the universal core of the RI stage”. The Acquisition of Syntax in Romance Languages ed. by Vincent Torrens & Linda Escobar, 159–182. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wijnen, F. 1997. “Functionele categorieën in Nederlandse kindertaal”. Nederlandse Taalkunde 21.178–198.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2004. “West Germanic verb clusters. The empirical domain”. Verb Clusters. A Study of Hungarian, Dutch and German ed. by Katalin Kiss & Henk van Riemsdijk, 43–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuckerman, Shalom. 2001. The acquisition of ‘optional’ movement. PhD diss., University of Groningen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

van Kampen, Jacqueline
2017. Afrikaans directionality switch in ‘triple’ V-clusters with the auxiliary het . Linguistics in the Netherlands 34 ► pp. 77 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue