Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2015
Edited by Björn Köhnlein and Jenny Audring
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 32] 2015
► pp. 48–62

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

On the syntactic nature of the Dutch prefix

 | University of Connecticut
 | University of Pennsylvania
 | Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 17 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.32.04fen
This paper provides a novel syntactic analysis of the Dutch prefix be-. This prefix can derive new verbs by attaching to verbs (be-vindV-en ‘to be located’), nouns (be-dijkN-en ‘to dam up’) or adjectives (be-grootA-en ‘to economize’). It can also form new adpositions by combining with adjectives (be-needA-en, ‘below’) or prepositions (be-ove(r)P-(e)n ‘above’). We propose an analysis of be- based on Aboh’s (2010) account for complex locative expressions in typologically different languages, including Gungbe, Zina Kotoko, English and Dutch. We extend this analysis to Dutch verbal complexes, and argue that be- expresses a functional category (F°) that embeds a predicate phrase containing the element it attaches to, in both adpositions and verbs. Our analysis goes against Hoekstra, Lansu and Westerduin’s (1987) small clause account of be- in verbal complexes in which be- is the head of a predicate phrase (Pr°).
References (19)
Aboh, Enoch O. 2010. “The P-route”. Mapping spatial PPs ed. by Guglielmo Cinque, 225–260. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 2002. The morphology of Dutch. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowers, J. 1993. “The syntax of predication”. Linguistic Inquiry 241.591–656.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, M. To appear. “The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch”. Syntax.
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands: Een overzicht van de woordvorming. ’s-Gravenhage: SDU Uitgeverij.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vries, Jan Willem. 1975. Lexicale Morfologie van het Werkwoord in Modern Nederlands. Leiden: Universitaire Pers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Den Besten, Hans. 1983. “On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules”. On the formal syntax of the Westgermania: Papers from the third Groningen Grammar Talks ed. by Werner Abraham. Linguistik Aktuell 31:47–131 Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 1998. “Predicate inversion in DP”. Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase ed. by A. Alexiadou and C. Vilder, 177–215. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoekstra, T.A., M. Lansu & M. Westerduin. 1987. “Complexe Verba”. Glot 101.61–77.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2002. “Prepositions and PPs in Zina Kotoko” Some Aspects of the Grammar of Zina Kotoko ed. by B. Kappel Schmidt, D. Odden and A. Holmberg, 162–174. Muenchen: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. 1985. “Principles of particle constructions”. Grammatical representation 221.101–140.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Harald Baayen. 1993. “Verbal prefixes in Dutch: a study in lexical conceptual structure”. Yearbook of Morphology 1993 ed. by G. Booij and J. van Marle, 51–78. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian G. & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schultink, Henk. 1962 [1980]. De morfologische valentine van het ongelede adjectief in modern Nederlands. Utrecht: Hes Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Volume I1. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. & W. Zonneveld. 1986. “Dutch Morphology: Evidence for the Righthand Head Rule”. Linguistic Inquiry 171.147–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 2005. “Resultatives under the ‘Event –Argument Homomorphism’ model of telicity”. The Syntax of Aspect: Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation ed. by N. Erteschik-Shir and T. Rapoport, 255–273. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue