Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2015
Edited by Björn Köhnlein and Jenny Audring
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 32] 2015
► pp. 16–32
Grammatical and pragmatic properties of the DP in children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) and in children with High Functioning Autism (HFA)
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 17 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.32.02cre
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.32.02cre
This study investigates whether grammar and pragmatics are separate linguistic components or not, and whether children with SLI and children with HFA have overlapping or distinct linguistic profiles. We examine two DP-related phenomena: the mass-count distinction (grammatical) and the choice for a definite/indefinite article (pragmatic). We tested 27 children with HFA aged 6–14, age and gender matched to 27 children with SLI, and 27 TD controls on a Quantity Judgment Task (mass-count) and an Elicited Production Task (article choice). Our results show that pragmatics can be impaired independently from grammar (in HFA) and vice versa (in SLI), providing evidence for a modular view of grammar and pragmatics, and against an overlap in the profiles of SLI and HFA.
References (34)
American Psychiatric Association. 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Barner, D. & J. Snedeker. 2005. “Quantity judgments and individuation: Evidence that mass nouns count”. Cognition 971.41–66.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1988. “Social and pragmatic deficits in autism: Cognitive or affective?” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 18:3.379–402.
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. Roots and Affixes. Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax. LOT Publications, Utrecht.
Bishop, Dorothy. 2000. “Pragmatic language impairment: A correlate of SLI, a distinct subgroup, or part of the autistic continuum”. Speech and language impairments in children: Causes, characteristics, intervention and outcome ed. by D. Bishop and L. Leonard, 99–113. Hove: Psychology Press.
Chondrogianni, V., & T. Marinis. 2015. “Production of definite and indefinite articles in typically developing English-speaking children and children with SLI”. Lingua, 1551.9–28.
Friedmann, Naama & Rama Novogrodsky. 2008. “Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI, and PraSLI”. Language Acquisition and Development ed. by A. Gavarró & M.J. Freitas, 205–217. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Press/CSP.
Friedmann, N., & R. Novogrodsky. 2011. “Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI.” Lingua 1211.367–382.
Frith, U. 1989. “Autism: Explaining the enigma”. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 31.465–468.
Froud, K., & H. van der Lely. 2008. “The count-mass distinction in typically developing and grammatically specifically language impaired children: New evidence on the role of syntax and semantics”. Journal of communication disorders 41:3.274–303.
Gibson, J., C. Adams, E. Lockton, & J. Green. 2013. “Social communication disorder outside autism? A diagnostic classification approach to delineating pragmatic language impairment, high functioning autism and specific language impairment”. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 54:11.1186–1197.
Hacohen, Aviya & Schaeffer, Jeannette. 2013. On the syntactic mass/count distinction in Hebrew child language – Language change? Paper presented at the Scandinavian Conference on Linguistics, Workshop on syntactic issues in Language Acquisition.
Hawkins, J.A. 1991. “On (in)definite articles: Implicatures and (un)grammaticality prediction”. Journal of Linguistics 271.405–442.
Heim, Irene. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite NPs. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA.
Horn, Laurence R. 2006. “Toward a Fregean pragmatics: Voraussetzung, Nebengedanke, Andeutung.” Explorations in Pragmatics: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Intercultural Aspects, ed. by L.R. Horn & I. Kecskes, 39–69. Berlin: Mouton.
Van Hout, A., K. Harrigan, & J. de Villiers. 2010. “Asymmetries in the acquisition of definite and indefinite NPs”. Lingua 120(8). 1973–1990.
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1979. A Functional Approach to Child Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kjelgaard, M.M. & Tager-Flusberg, H. 2001. “An investigation of language impairment in autism: Implications for genetic subgroups”. Language and cognitive processes 16:2-3.287–308.
Van der Lely, H. 1998. “SLI in children: Movement, economy and deficits in the computational-syntactic system”. Language Acquisition 71.161–192.
Maratsos, Michael P. 1976. The use of definite and indefinite reference in young children: An experimental study of semantic acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noveck, I. 2001. “When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature”. Cognition 78:2.165–188.
Papafragou, A. 2006. “From scalar semantics to implicature: Children’s interpretation of aspectuals”. Journal of Child Language 331.721–757.
Papafragou, A, & J. Musolino. 2003. “Scalar implicatures: experiments at the semantics pragmatics interface”. Cognition 86:3.253–282.
Perovic, A., N. Modyanova & K. Wexler. 2013. “Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit?” Applied Psycholinguistics 34:4.813–835.
Polite, E.J., L.B. Leonard & F.D. Roberts. 2011. “The use of definite and in-definite articles by children with specific language impairment.” International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 131.291–300.
Pouscoulous, N., I.A. Noveck, G. Politzer & A. Bastide. 2007. “A developmental investigation of processing costs in implicature production”. Language Acquisition 14:4.347–375.
Rumelhart, David & James L. McClelland. 1987. Parallel Distributed Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Schaeffer, J. & L. Matthewson. 2005. “Grammar and pragmatics in the acquisition of article systems”. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 23:1.53–101.
Semel, Eleanor M., Elisabeth H. Wiig, Wayne A. Secord & Willem Kort. 2008. CELF® 4 NL: Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals: Nederlandse versie. Pearson.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. “Pragmatic presuppositions”. Semantics and Philosophy ed. by M.K. Munitz & P. Unger, 197–214. New York: New York University Press.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Andreou, Georgia, Vasiliki Lymperopoulou & Despina Papoudi
Dai, Huilin, Xiaowei He, Haopeng Yu, Yunting Wang & Shuang Hu
Andreou, Georgia, Vasiliki Lymperopoulou & Vasiliki Aslanoglou
Andreou, Georgia, Vasiliki Lymperopoulou & Vasiliki Aslanoglou
Andreou, Georgia, Vasiliki Lymperopoulou & Vasiliki Aslanoglou
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 2 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
