Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2012
Edited by Marion Elenbaas and Suzanne Aalberse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 29] 2012
► pp. 147–158
Easy to (re)analyse
Tough-constructions in minimalism
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 2 November 2012
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.29.12zwa
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.29.12zwa
Within minimalism, we may assume derivations to involve subderivations, connected by the interface components dealing with sound and meaning (layered derivations). If so, complex adjectival constructions involving predicates like tough/easy (as in John is easy to please) receive a natural account in terms of reanalysis taking place at these interface components, turning a complex adjectival construction into a simplex adjective which can be merged in predicative or attributive position in the next derivation layer. Arguments against reanalysis address earlier, more complicated conceptions of reanalysis, and fail to distinguish plain and expanded tough-constructions, the latter not showing any reanalysis characteristics. In a layered-derivation cum reanalysis approach, the arguments for empty operator movement in the embedded infinitival clause disappear, and the reanalysed construction shows the properties of an adjectival passive instead.
Cited by (4)
Cited by four other publications
Giurgea, Ion & Elena Soare
Guéron, Jacqueline
de Vries, Mark
Giurgea, Ion
2016. Romanian tough-constructions and multi-headed constituents. In Romance Linguistics 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 9], ► pp. 119 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
