Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2010
Edited by Jacqueline van Kampen and Rick Nouwen
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 27] 2010
► pp. 115–128
Assessing the discourse referential properties of weak definite NPs
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 11 October 2010
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.27.10sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.27.10sch
Cited by (10)
Cited by ten other publications
Aguilar‐Guevara, Ana & Carolina Oggiani
Agulló, Jorge
Alhailawani, Mohammad
Krifka, Manfred & Fereshteh Modarresi
2023. Anaphoric potential of bare nominals, incorporated objects and weak definites in German. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 27 ff.
Modarresi, Fereshteh & Manfred Krifka
Modarresi, Fereshteh & Manfred Krifka
2023. Anaphoric potential of pseudo-incorporated bare objects in Persian. In Advances in Iranian Linguistics II [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 361], ► pp. 12 ff.
de Swart, Peter & Geertje van Bergen
2014. Unscrambling the lexical nature of weak definites. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 287 ff.
Schumacher, Petra B. & Hanna Weiland-Breckle
2014. Referential properties of definites and salience spreading. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 365 ff.
Schwarz, Florian
2014. How weak and how definite are Weak Definites?. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 213 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
