Boundary tones and the semantics of the Dutch final particles hé, hoor, zeg and joh

Kirsner, Robert S.; van Heuven, Vincent J.

doi:10.1075/avt.13.14kir

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 1996
Edited by Crit Cremers and Marcel den Dikken
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 13] 1996
► pp. 133–146

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download PDF

Boundary tones and the semantics of the Dutch final particles hé, hoor, zeg and joh

Robert S. Kirsner

Vincent J. van Heuven

Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 10 August 1996

https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.13.14kir

Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Order by:

Depraetere, Ilse, Stéphanie Caët, Sara Debulpaep, Siham Ezzahid & Vikki Janke

2024. Building a Child’s Trust before a Medical Procedure: A Linguistic Case Study. Applied Linguistics 45:6 ► pp. 973 ff.

van der Wouden, Ton & Ad Foolen

2021. Dutch pragmatic markers in the left periphery. In Pragmatic Markers and Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 325], ► pp. 49 ff.

Caspers, Johanneke

2000. Experiments on the Meaning of Four Types of Single-Accent Intonation Patterns in Dutch. Language and Speech 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff.

Foolen, Ad

1997. Pragmatic particles. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.