Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2023
Edited by Sterre Leufkens and Marco Bril
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 40] 2023
► pp. 23–38

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Univerbation in Afrikaans verbal diminutives

 | KU Leuven
 | KU Leuven | Stellenbosch University
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with KU Leuven.

Published online: 3 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00077.cav
Abstract
This paper concerns the verbal diminutive suffixes -el and -er in Afrikaans. In previous work (Cavirani-Pots, Cora, Engela de Villiers & Dany Jaspers. 2023. “More species in the affixal forest. the case of dutch and afrikaans -el and -er.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 139(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), these suffixes have been analysed on par with their Dutch counterparts. In this paper we present the results of a nonsense word experiment on these suffixes in Afrikaans (94 participants) and Dutch (242 participants). The results show that the Afrikaans participants significantly underperform in guessing the meaning of these suffixes compared to the Dutch participants. We take this to mean that the underlying structure of verbs containing these suffixes is different in the two languages. Based on the three-way division of affix types of Creemers, Ava, Jan Don & Paula Fenger. 2018. “Some affixes are roots, others are heads.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 361: 45–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, we follow Cavirani-Pots, Cora, Engela de Villiers & Dany Jaspers. 2023. “More species in the affixal forest. the case of dutch and afrikaans -el and -er.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 139(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar’s analysis of the Dutch -el and -er suffixes as being level Ia suffixes, i.e. suffixes that appear right above the stem they attach to. For Afrikaans, however, we propose that -el and -er have lost their suffixal status, and have undergone univerbation with the stem.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous work
    • 2.1Creemers et al. (2018)
    • 2.2Cavirani-Pots et al. (2023)
  • 3.The experiment
    • 3.1Methodology
    • 3.2Data preparation
    • 3.3Results
  • 4.Theoretical analysis
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (35)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2009. “Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology.” York-Essex Morphology Meeting, ed. by Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo, 1–21.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Audring, Jenny, Geert E. Booij & Ray S. Jackendoff. 2017. “Menschlen, kibbelen, sparkle. verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 1–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beavers, John & Andrew Koontz-Garboden. 2020. The Roots of Verbal Meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. The Normal Course of Events: Structuring Sense, vol. II1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boudelaa, Sami & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2004. “Abstract morphemes and lexical representation: The CV-skeleton in Arabic.” Cognition 92(3): 271–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Combrink, Johan G. H. 1990. Afrikaanse Morfologie. Capita Exemplaria. Pretoria: Academica.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cavirani-Pots, Cora. 2020. “Roots in progress. semi-lexicality in the Dutch and Afrikaans verbal domain.” PhD diss., LOT Dissertation series, Amsterdam.
Cavirani-Pots, Cora, Engela de Villiers & Dany Jaspers. 2023. “More species in the affixal forest. the case of dutch and afrikaans -el and -er.” Tijdschrift voor Nederlandse Taal- en Letterkunde 139(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conradie, Jac. 2007. “The final stages of deflection: the case of afrikaans het ‘have’.” Historical Linguistics 2005. Selected papers from the 17th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, ed. by J. Salmons & S. Dubenion-Smith, 207–221.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Creemers, Ava. 2020. “Morphological processing and the effects of semantic transparency.” PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Creemers, Ava, Jan Don & Paula Fenger. 2018. “Some affixes are roots, others are heads.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 361: 45–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Belder, Marijke. 2011. “Roots and affixes. Eliminating lexical categories from syntax.” PhD diss., UiL-OTS/Utrecht University/HUBrussel.
. 2017. “The root and nothing but the root: primary compounds in Dutch.” Syntax 20(2): 138–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haas, Wim & Mieke Trommelen. 1993. Morfologisch handboek van het Nederlands. Een overzicht van de woordvorming. Den Haag: Sdu.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Vos, Mark Andrew. 2003. “Past participles in Afrikaans dialects and Dutch.” WCCFL 22 Proceedings ed. by G. Garding & M. Tsujimura, 519–532.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 2012. Roots of Afrikaans. Selected writings of Hans den Besten. (Creole Language Library 44). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feldman, Laurie Beth & Shlomo Bentin. 1994. “Morphological analysis of diisrupted morphemes: Evidence from Hebrew.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Phychology 47(2): 407–435. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frost, Ram, Avital Deutsch, Orna Gilboa, Michal Tannenbaum & William D. Marslen-Wilson. 2000. “Morphological priming: Dissociation of phonological, semantic, and morphological factors.” Memory & Cognition 28(8): 1277–1288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haas, Florian. 2007. “The development of english each other: grammaticalization, lexicalization, or both?” English Language and Linguistics 11(1): 31–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. “Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection.” The View from Building 2.0, ed. by Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2009. “Compounding in Distributed Morphology.” Oxford Handbook of Compounding, ed. by Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Stekauer, 129–144. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Rolf Noyer. 1999. “State-of-the-Article: Disttributed Morphology.” GLOT International 4(4): 3–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. 2004. “Lexicalization and grammaticalization: opposite or orthogonal?” What makes grammaticalization: a look from its fringes and its components, ed. by Walter Bisang, Nikolaus P. Himmelmann & Benjamin Wieber, 21–42. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. “From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology.” The structure of phonological representations (I), ed. by Harry van der Hulst & Neil Smith. Foris Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Longtin, Catherine-Marie, Juan Segui & Pierre A. Halle. 2003. “Morphological priming without morphological relationship.” Language and Cognitive Processes 18(3): 313–334. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lowenstamm, Jean. 2014. “Derivational affixes as roots: Phasal spell-out meet English stress shift.” The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, ed. by Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer, 230–259. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, William D., Lorraine K. Tyler, Rachelle Waksler & Lianne Older. 1994. “Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon.” Psychological Review 101(2): 3–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastle, Kathleen, Matt H. Davis, William D. Marslen-Wilson & Lorraine K. Tyler. 2000. “Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study.” Language and Cognitive Processes 4–51: 507–537. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth O. 1982. The Syntax of Words. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Dorothy. 1974. “Topics in English Morphology.” PhD diss., MIT.
Smolka, Eva, Sarolta Komlosi & Frank Rösler. 2009. “When semantics means less than morphology: The processing of German prefixed verbs.” Language and Cognitive Processes 24(3): 337–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weidhaas, Thomas & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2015. “Diminutive verbs in german. semantic analysis and theoretiical implications.” Morphology 25(2): 183–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Nina. 2007. “Root merger in Chinese compounds.” Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue