Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 279–294

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

The role of word frequency in the L2 acquisition of variable patterns

A case study of the pronunciation of English words with –man by Chinese learners

ORCiD logo with link | Shenzhen University
ORCiD logo with link | Fryske Akademy (KNAW)
ORCiD logo with link | Fangchenggang Vocational and Technical College
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00074.weij
Abstract
Second language acquisition often involves the acquisition of stable patterns in a target language. Here we investigate how the acquisition of a variable pronunciation pattern, viz. the pronunciation of the semisuffix -man in professional names in English (e.g. policeman, businessman) is related to the lexical frequency of the words concerned. The pronunciation of this suffix varies between a full vowel and a reduced one in a lexically unpredictable manner (i.e. some words with -man tend to have schwa, others a full vowel, and still others vary between the two). To test how the pronunciation of such words is acquired in a second language, we carried out a picture naming experiment in which Chinese subjects were asked to pronounce them. The results show that the pronunciation of this semisuffix is especially related to the educational status of subjects (major vs. non-major).
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Approach
    • 2.2Stimuli
    • 2.3Subjects
    • 2.4Design
    • 2.5Procedure
  • 3.Results
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (18)
References
Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker & Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2017. “Praat: Doing phonetics by computer.” [URL]
Bybee, Joan. 2008. “Usage-based grammar and second language acquisition.” Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition, ed. by Peter Robinson and Nick C. Ellis. 216–236. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corpus of Contemporary American English. 2015. “COCA (1990–2015, 520 million words).” [URL]
Crossley, Scott A., Tom Salsbury, Ashley Titak & Danielle McNamara. 2014. “Frequency effects and second language lexical acquisition: Word types, word tokens, and word production.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19 (3): 301–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, Scott A., Stephen Skalicky, Kristopher Kyle & Katia Monteiro. 2019. “Absolute frequency effects in second language lexical acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 41 (4): 721–744. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denhovska, Nadiia, Ludovica Serratrice & John Payne. 2016. “Acquisition of second language grammar under incidental learning conditions: The role of frequency and working memory.” Language Learning 66 (1): 159–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. 2002. “Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 143–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ellis, Nick C. & Laura Collins. 2009. “Input and second language acquisition: The roles of frequency, form, and function introduction to the special issue.” The Modern Language Journal 93 (3): 329–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M. & Alison Mackey. 2002. “Frequency effects and second language acquisition: A complex picture?” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24 (2): 249–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel, Peter Roach, Jane Setter & John Esling. 2011. Cambridge English Pronouncing Dictionary, 18th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Wai-Sum & Eric Zee. 2003. “Illustrations of the IPA: Standard Chinese (Beijing).” Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33 (1): 109–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, Fanny & Céline Gouverneur. 2009. “New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material.” Corpora and language teaching (Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33) ed. by Karin Aijmer. 179–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peitsara, Kirsti. 2006. “MAN-Compounds in English.” Selected Proceedings of the 2005 Symposium on New Approaches in English Historical Lexis (HEL-LEX), ed. by R. W. McConchie, Olga Timofeeva, Heli Tissari and Tanja Säily. 113–22. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Development Team. 2017. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition). 2007. Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL]
van de Weijer, Jeroen, Marjoleine Sloos & Weiyun Wei. 2019. “Vowel reduction in English -man compounds.” The Linguistic Review 36 (4): 675–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wells, John C. 2008. Longman Pronunciation Dictionary, 3rd edn. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue