Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 192–208
De dochter doet een powernap
Definite article possessives with kinship terms in Dutch
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Open Access publication of this article was funded through a Transformative Agreement with Radboud University Nijmegen.
Published online: 4 November 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00069.suij
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00069.suij
Abstract
While kinship relations in Dutch are usually introduced by a possessive determiner, Twitter users have recently been observed to use a definite article in that position. To learn more about the characteristics of this construction, we performed an
exploratory investigation of the definite article possession construction with Dutch kinship terms on Twitter. We analysed 100
tweets for 24 kinship terms each, and annotated for the type of pre-nominal modifier used. Results show that the phenomenon is far
from peripheral, as 13.2% of all selected tweets featured a definite article. The construction was most frequent with descending
and horizontal relationship terms, and with improper kin terms (i.e. terms with a non-kin meaning at least as prominent as
kinship use; Dahl, Östen, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. 2001. “Kinship
in grammar”. Dimensions of Possession ed. by Irène Baron, Michael Herslund and Finn Sørensen. 201–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. : 202). These findings were explained by
pointing to redundancy and the comical effect of distancing the construction creates.
Keywords: Dutch, possession, definite articles, Twitter, corpus linguistics
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Similarities to other constructions in Dutch
- 3.Data and method
- 3.1Dutch kinship terms
- 3.2Current study
- 4.Results
- 4.1General results
- 4.2Results per kinship term
- 4.3Senders
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
- Abbreviations
References
References (20)
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn & Joost Zwarts. 2014. “Advances
in weak referentiality.” Weak Referentiality ed.
by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Audring, Jenny. 2020a. “Possessive
pronouns”. Taalportaal, 14 May
2020, [URL]
. 2020b. “Articles”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans & Norbert Corver. 2020. “Topic
drop”. Taalportaal, 14 May
2020, [URL]
Broekhuis, Hans & Marcel den Dikken. 2020. “The definite article
in inalienable possession constructions”. Taalportaal, 14 May 2020, [URL]
Ciot, Morgane, Morgan Sonderegger & Derek Ruths. 2013. “Gender
Inference of Twitter Users in Non-English Contexts.” Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on
Empirical Methods in Natural Language
Processing 1136–1145.
Dahl, Östen, Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm. 2001. “Kinship
in grammar”. Dimensions of Possession ed. by Irène Baron, Michael Herslund and Finn Sørensen. 201–225. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Haeseryn, Walter, Kirsten Romijn, Guido Geerts, Jaap de Rooij & Maarten van den Toorn. 2019. “Het
bezittelijk voornaamwoord (possessief pronomen).” Algemene Nederlandse
Spraakkunst, January 2019, [URL]
Hunt, Matthew & Eric K. Action. 2022. “‘How’s
the wife?’: Pragmatic reasoning in spousal reference”. Journal of
Pragmatics 1881: 152–170.
Le Bruyn, Bert. 2014. Inalienable
possession. The semantics of the definite article. Weak
referentiality, ed. by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts. 311–334. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lee-Schoenfeld, Vera. 2016. The
syntax of external and internal possessor variation in German inalienable
possession. STUF 69(1), 113–129.
Leufkens, Sterre & Marten van der Meulen. 2018. “De kleuter en de
peuter – nog meer afstandelijkheid in relaties”. De Taalpassie van
Milfje, 23 August 2018, [URL]
McConvell, Patrick. 2013. “Introduction.
Kinship Change in Anthropology and Linguistics.” Kinship systems. Change and
reconstruction ed. by Patrick McConvell, Ian Keen and Rachel Hendery. 1–18. Utah: The University of Utah Press.
Payne, Doris L. & Immanuel Barshi. 1999. “External
Possession: What, Where, How, and Why”. External Possession ed.
by Doris L. Payne and Immanuel Barshi. 3–29. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Read, Dwight. 2013. “A
New Approach to Forming a Typology of Kinship Terminology Systems: From Morgan and Murdock to the
Present.” Structure and
Dynamics 6(1): 1–26.
Scholten, Jolien. 2018. “The
ins and outs of external possession: A micro-comparative perspective”. PhD
diss., Utrecht University.
Statista. 2022. “Twitter:
Distribution of global audiences 2021, by gender.” Accessed 1 February 2022. [URL]
Van der Meulen, Marten & Sterre Leufkens. 2018. “De
vriend en ik”. De Taalpassie van Milfje, 16 August 2018, [URL]
Van Veen, Piet. 1929. Fouten:
oorspronkelijke roman. Amsterdam: Nederlandsche Uitgevers-maatschap. [URL]
