Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2022
Edited by Jorrig Vogels and Sterre Leufkens
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 39] 2022
► pp. 55–71

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Interpreting idioms in a second language

The role of context and transfer in interpreting English idioms by native Dutch speakers

 | University of Groningen
 | University of Groningen
 | University of Groningen
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 4 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00061.dij
Abstract
How do people understand figurative speech in a foreign language? What strategies do they use? By means of an online questionnaire, this study investigated to what extent contextual information and transfer play a role in the interpretation of idioms in a second language, controlling for familiarity. Sixty-one native speakers of Dutch were asked to guess the correct interpretation of English idioms with and without a Dutch equivalent, presented with and without context, out of four answer options. The results showed that correctly interpreting an idiom depends on both the presence of context and the possibility of transfer. More correct interpretations were given when an idiom was presented in a context, but only for English idioms without an equivalent in the native language. English idioms with an equivalent in Dutch, often rated as familiar, were mostly understood correctly. We interpret this result as the involvement of transfer from the native language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction and background
  • 2.Methods
    • 2.1Participants
    • 2.2Materials
    • 2.3Procedure
  • 3.Analysis and results
    • 3.1Exclusion of idioms
    • 3.2The effect of context and transfer
    • 3.3Incorrect interpretations of English idioms without L1-equivalent
  • 4.Discussion and conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Data availability
  • References
References (24)
References
Abel, Beate. 2003. “English Idioms in the First Language and Second Language Lexicon: a Dual Representation Approach”. Second Language Research 19 (4): 329–358. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boers, Frank & Murielle Demecheleer. 2001. “Measuring the impact of cross-cultural differences on learners’ comprehension of imageable idioms”. ELT Journal 55 (3): 255–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulut, Türkay & İlkay Celik-Yazici. 2004. “Idiom Processing in L2: Through Rose-Colored Glasses”. The Reading Matrix 4 (2): 105–116.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan & Timothy Ennis. 2001. “A comparative study of metaphor in Spanish and English financial reporting”. English for Specific Purposes 20 (3): 249–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, Thomas C. 1998. “Teaching Idioms”. Foreign Language Annals 31 (2): 255–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. “Processing of Idioms by L2 Learners of English”. TESOL Quarterly 33 (2): 233–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forrester, Michael A. 1995. “Tropic Implicature and Context in the Comprehension of Idiomatic Phrases”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 24 (1): 1–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding Figurative Language: From Metaphors to Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. Syntax and Semantics. Vol III: Speech acts ed by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubers, Ferdy. 2019. “Two of a kind: Idiomatic expressions by native speakers and second language learners”. PhD diss., Radboud University Nijmegen. LOT publications 551.
Irujo, Suzanne. 1986. “Don’t Put Your Leg in Your Mouth: Transfer in the Acquisition of Idioms in a Second Language”. TESOL Quarterly 20 (2): 287–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karlsson, Monica. 2013. “Quantitative and qualitative aspects of L1 (Swedish) and L2 (English) idiom comprehension”. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 3 (2): 293–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellerman, Eric. 1987. “Aspects of transferability in second language acquisition”. PhD diss., Catholic University of Nijmegen.
La Roi, Amélie. 2021. “Idioms in the Aging Brain”. PhD diss., University of Groningen.
Liontas, John I. 2003. “Killing two birds with one stone: understanding Spanish VP idioms in and out of context”. Hispania 86 (2): 289–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Dilin. 2008. Idioms: Description, Comprehension, Acquisition, and Pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Ivan A. Sag & Thomas Wasow. 1994. “Idioms”. Language 70 (3): 491–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team 2020. “R: A language and environment for statistical computing”. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: [URL]
Schenk, André. 1995. “The Syntactic Behavior of Idioms”. Idioms: Structural and Psychological Perspectives ed. by Martin Everaert et al. 253–272. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schweigert, Wendy A. 1986. “The Comprehension of Familiar and Less Familiar Idioms”. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 15 (1): 33–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siefring, Judith. 2004. Oxford Dictionary of Idioms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprenger, Simone, Willem Levelt & Gerard Kempen. 2006. “Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases”. Journal of Memory and Language 54 (2): 161–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titone, Debra A. & Cynthia M. Connine. 1994. “Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 9 (4): 247–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velasco, Yvonne Pedria. 2016. “Compositionality/Non-Compositionality of Idioms: Non-Native Speakers’ Constraints to Comprehension”. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics 6 (1): 135–144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue