Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2021
Edited by Mark Dingemanse, Eva van Lier and Jorrig Vogels
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 38] 2021
► pp. 98–113
Temporal adverbial superlatives in Dutch
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 29 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00052.tel
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00052.tel
Abstract
This paper investigates adverbial superlative expressions in Dutch that have a temporal interpretation, i.e. that
contain the forms eerst ‘first’, laatst ‘latest’, and vroegst ‘earliest’. I
focus on possessive superlatives and superlatives embedded under the preposition voor. Although both
constructions contain bare superlatives and are interpreted temporally, they represent semantically and pragmatically different
readings, and attach to the sentence in structurally different ways. I present a semantic analysis of both types of superlatives,
and I show what this entails for how time adverbials interact with superlatives.
Keywords: superlatives, Dutch, adverbial superlatives, time adverbials
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The two constructions in more detail
- 2.1Possessive superlative
- 2.2Voor-superlative
- 3.Analysis
- 3.1Possessive superlatives
- 3.2Voor-superlatives
- 4.Relation between superlatives and time adverbials
- 5.Conclusion
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (25)
Barbiers, S. 2007. Indefinite
numerals one and many and the cause of ordinal
suppletion. Lingua, 117(5):859–880.
Bylinina, L., Ivlieva, N., Podobryaev, A., and Sudo, Y. 2015. A
Non-Superlative Semantics for Ordinals and the Syntax and Semantics of Comparison
Classes. Manuscript.
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., and Roelofsen, F. 2018. Inquisitive
semantics. Oxford University Press.
Condoravdi, C. 2015. Ignorance,
indifference, and individuation with
wh-ever. In Alonso-Ovalle, L. and Menéndez-Benito, P., editors, Epistemic
indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal
domain, pages 213–243. Oxford University Press.
Coppock, E. and Bogal-Allbritten, E. 2018. Forces
at the interface of gradability and quantification. Proceedings of
SALT, 281:747–767.
Coppock, E. and Brochhagen, T. 2013. Raising
and resolving issues with scalar modifiers. Semantics and
Pragmatics, 6:3:1–57.
Landman, F. 2006. Indefinite
time phrases, in situ scope, and dual-perspective
intensionality. In Vogeleer, S. and Tasmowski, L., editors, Non-definiteness
and
Plurality, pages 237–266. John Benjamins Publishing.
2015. Modified
numerals: The epistemic effect. In Alonso-Ovalle, L. and Menéndez-Benito, P., editors, Epistemic
indefinites: Exploring modality beyond the verbal
domain, pages 244–266. Oxford University Press.
Penka, D. 2010. A
superlative analysis of superlative scalar modifiers. Handout of presentation
at Sinn und Bedeutung 15.
Romero, M. 2013. Modal
superlatives: a compositional analysis. Natural Language
Semantics, 21(1):79–110.
Solt, S. 2011. How
many most’s? In Reich, I., Horsch, E., and Pauly, D., editors, Proceedings
of Sinn und
Bedeutung 151, pages 565–580. Saarland University Press.
Tabatowski, M. 2019. Possessed
bare superlatives make reference to individual concepts. In Baird, M. and Pesetsky, J., editors, Proceedings
of
NELS 491, pages 211–220. GLSA.
Tellings, J. 2019a. Bare
superlatives and relative clauses in Dutch. Handout for Syntax Interface Lecture, Utrecht, Nov
2019. Available at [URL]
