Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 119–134

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Clause order and syntactic integration patterns in Dutch conditionals

 | Universiteit Leiden
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 27 October 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00041.reu
Abstract
Conditional clauses in Dutch can occur in sentence-initial and sentence-final position. For sentence-initial conditionals, a number of syntactic integration patterns are available. This corpus study investigates to what extent clause order and syntactic integration are associated with text mode (spoken, written) and register (formal, informal). Sentence-initial position of the conditional clause is shown to be most frequent in both modes and registers, although sentence-final position is more frequent than one would expect based on the literature, especially in written texts. The distribution of syntactic integration patterns shows a clear difference between modes, as full integration of the conditional clause into the main clause is most frequent in written texts, whereas the use of the resumptive element dan (‘then’) is most frequent in spoken texts.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Clause order and syntactic integration
    • 2.1Three clause orders
    • 2.2Three patterns of syntactic integration
    • 2.3Conclusion
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Clause order in Dutch conditionals
    • 4.2Syntactic integration in sentence-initial conditionals
    • 4.3Conclusion
  • 5.Conclusion and discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Agresti, Alan. 2007. An introduction to categorical data analysis (Second edition). New York: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2000. “Pre- and post-positioning of wenn-clauses in spoken and written German.” Topics in English Linguistics 33(15): 173–204. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beekhuizen, Barend. 2016. “De zijnsstatus van de afhankelijke V1-constructie in het Nederlands.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 21(1): 33–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Susan Conrad. 2009. Genre, register and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 2007. “Conditionele constructies met moest(en) en mocht(en) in Belgisch-Nederlands en Nederlands-Nederlands.” Neerlandistiek.nl 7(5).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny & Kim Verheij. 2013. “Als dát geen insubordinatie is! De pragmatiek van zelfstandige conditionele zinnen.” Honderd jaar taalwetenschap. Artikelen aangeboden aan Saskia Daalder bij haar afscheid van de Vrije Universiteit ed. by T. A. J. M. Janssen & J. Noordegraaf. 13–28. Amsterdam: St. Neerlandistiek VU & Münster, Nodus Publikationen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter-Thomas, Shirley & Elizabeth Rowley-Jolivet. 2008. “If-conditionals in medical discourse: From theory to disciplinary practice.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 7(3): 191–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1986. “Conditionals: A typology.” On Conditionals ed. by E. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly, & C. A. Ferguson. 77–99. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge, and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Eve Sweetser. 1997. “Then in conditional constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 8(2): 109–136. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Constructions with if, since, and because: Causality, epistemic stance, and clause order.” Topics in English Linguistics 331: 111–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat & Susan Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diessel, Holger. 2005. “Competing motivations for the ordering of main and adverbial clauses.” Linguistics 43(3): 449–470. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Adverbial subordination.” The Bloomsbury companion to syntax ed. by S. Luraghi & C. Parodi. 41–354. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. “Insubordination and its uses.” Finiteness: Theoretical and empirical foundations ed. by I. Nikolaeva. 366–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Gibson. 2001. “‘If you pop over there’: A corpus-based study of conditionals in medical discourse.” English for Specific Purposes 20(1): 61–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Field, Andy, Jeremy Miles & Zoë Field. 2012. Discovering statistics using R. London: Thousand Oaks.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia. E. 1993. Grammar in interaction: Adverbial clauses in American English conversations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. “Speaking conditionally: Some contexts for if-clauses in conversation.” On conditionals again ed. by A. Athanasiadou & R. Dirven. 387–413. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia. E. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1986. “Conditionals in discourse: A text-based study from English.” On Conditionals ed. by E. C. Traugott, A. Ter Meulen, J. Snitzer Reilly & C. A. Ferguson. 353–372. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2010. “A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types.” PhD dissertation, Lancaster University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. “Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements.” Universals of human language ed. by J. H. Greenberg. 73–113. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gwet, Kilem L. 2014. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (Fourth edition). Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics, LLC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. “Conditionals are topics.” Language 54(3): 564–589. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine. 1991. Topics in conditionals. Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994 “On the contribution of conditional then.” Natural Language Semantics 21: 171–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, Philip N. & Byrne, Ruth M. J. 2002. “Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference.” Psychological Review 109(4): 646–678. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard & Johan van der Auwera. 1988. “Clause integration in German and Dutch conditionals, concessive conditionals, and concessives.” Clause combining in grammar and discourse ed. by J. Haiman & S. A. Thompson. 101–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2007. “New resources, or just better old ones? The Holy Grail of representativeness.” Corpus linguistics and the web ed. by M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf & C. Biewer. 133–149. Leiden: Brill Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linde, Charlotte. 1976. “Constraints on the ordering of if-clauses.” Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 21, 280–285.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, Tony & Andrew Hardie. 2012. Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nall, Shu Pin & Timothy M. Nall. 2010. “English ‘if-clauses’: A corpus-based genre analysis of their incidence, ordering and pragmatic effects.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 7(2): 205–227.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke. 2000. “The Spoken Dutch Corpus. Overview and first evaluation.” Proceedings of LREC-2000, Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, Volume 21 ed. by M. Gravilidou, G. Carayannis, S. Markantanatou, S. Piperidis & G. Stainhaouer. Athens, 887–894.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke, Martin Reynaert, Véronique Hoste & Ineke Schuurman. 2013. “The construction of a 500-million-word reference corpus of contemporary written Dutch.” Essential speech and language technology for Dutch: Results by the STEVIN-programme ed. by P. Spyns & J. Odijk. 219–247. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ramsey, Violeta. 1987. “The functional distribution of preposed and postposed ‘if’ and ‘when’ clauses in written discourse.” Coherence and grounding in discourse ed. by R. S. Tomlin. 383–408. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Renmans, Bram & William van Belle. 2003. “The use of the particle dan in Dutch conditional sentences.” Leuvense Bijdragen 92(1): 141–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reuneker, Alex. 2017. “Sentence-medial if-clauses in Dutch.” Nederlandse Taalkunde 22(1): 137–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (forthc.). “Connecting conditionals. A bottom-up approach to categories of conditionals in Dutch.” Manuscript in preparation.
Schelfaut, F. 1982. Eerste deel: De Nederlandse conditionele bijzin, ingeleid door als, wanneer of zonder voegwoord, met of zonder dan in de hoofdzin. Tweede deel: De Nederlandse concessieve bijzin, ingeleid door al, alhoewel, hoewel, ofschoon, met of zonder toch in de bijzin. Luik: Memoire.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van der Horst, Joop. 1995. Analytische taalkunde. Groningen: Nijhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Met (het) oog op morgen: Opstellen over taal, taalverandering en standaardtaal. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verbrugge, Sara & Hans Smessaert. 2011. “On the distinction between inferential and meta-inferential conditionals in Dutch.” Journal of Pragmatics 43(14): 3387–3402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. “Restrictions on quantifier domains.” PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

van der Leer, Thomas J.C. & Lotte Hogeweg
2024.  Als dan or dan als?. Nota Bene 1:2 ► pp. 276 ff. DOI logo
Reuneker, Alex
2022. Addition, restriction, iteration. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 158 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue