Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2020
Edited by Elena Tribushinina and Mark Dingemanse
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 37] 2020
► pp. 53–70
Collective preferences in Dutch revealed by a covered-box experiment
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 27 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00037.kos
Abstract
Sentences with plural expressions are compatible with distributive and collective interpretations. Adults
generally prefer collective interpretations, whereas children do not. Dotlačil, Jakub. 2010. “Anaphora and distributivity. A study of same, different, reciprocals and others.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
argues that the adult collective preference arises via an implicature. Adults can reason about alternative utterances with the
distributive marker each, thereby ruling out distributive interpretations in favor of collective interpretations.
Experiment 1 used the covered-box paradigm to investigate whether adults and children make the comparisons predicted by Dotlačil’s
implicature account. Adults’ responses suggest that they made comparisons with internally generated alternatives, supporting the
implicature account. Moreover, children seem to do so from around 11 years old onwards, after they have learned the distributive
character of each. Experiment 2 excluded the possibility that our results in Experiment 1 were influenced by
participants’ exposure to both collective and distributive pictures, making the collective interpretation more salient. Both
experiments thus point towards an implicature underlying the adult collective preference.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodological considerations
- 3.Experiment 1
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Design and procedure
- 3.3Results
- 3.4Discussion
- 4.Experiment 2
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Design and procedure
- 4.3Results
- 5.General discussion
- 6.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Note
References
References (17)
Akaike, Hirotugu. 1974. “A new look at the statistical model identification.” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6): 716–723.
Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson & Douglas Bates. 2008. “Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items.” Journal of Memory and Language 59(4): 390–412.
Brooks, Patricia J. & Martin D. S. Braine. 1996. “What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each?” Cognition 60(3): 235–268.
Champollion, Lucas. 2017. Parts of a whole: Distributivity as a bridge between aspect and measurement. Vol. 661, Oxford University Press.
Dotlačil, Jakub. 2010. “Anaphora and distributivity. A study of same, different, reciprocals and others.” PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Frazier, Lyn, Jeremy Patch & Keith Rayner. 1999. “Taking on semantic commitments, II: collective versus distributive readings.” Cognition 70(1): 87–104.
Grice, Herbert. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In Syntax and semantics. Volume 3: Speech acts, ed. by P. Cole & J. J. Morgan. 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Huang, Yi Ting, Elizabeth Spelke & Jesse Snedeker. 2013. “What exactly do numbers mean?” Language Learning and Development 9(2): 105–129.
Katsos, Napoleon & Dorothy V. M. Bishop. 2011. “Pragmatic tolerance: Implications for the acquisition of informativeness and implicature.” Cognition 120(1): 67–81.
de Koster, Anna M. B., Jakub Dotlačil & Jennifer K. Spenader. 2017. “Children’s understanding of distributivity and adjectives of comparison.” In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 11: 373–386.
Landman, F. 2000. Events and plurality: The Jerusalem lectures, vol. 761. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Pub. 101: 978–94.
Musolino, Julien. 2009. “The logical syntax of number words: Theory, acquisition and processing.” Cognition 111(1): 24–45.
Padilla-Reyes, Ramon E. 2018. “Connections among scales, plurality, and intensionality in Spanish”. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.
Pagliarini, Elana, Gaetano Fiorin & Jakub Dotlačil. 2012. “The acquisition of distributivity in pluralities.” In Proceedings of the 36st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development 21: 387–399.
Schwarz, Florian, Cory Bill & Jacopo Romoli. 2016. “Reluctant acceptance of the literal truth: Eye tracking in the covered box paradigm.” In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 201: 61–78.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Dooren, Annemarie van & Angeliek van Hout
2025. Universal quantifiers in math and late language development in school-aged children. Nota Bene 2:2 ► pp. 474 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
