Cover not available

Article published In: Linguistics in the Netherlands 2018
Edited by Bert Le Bruyn and Janine Berns
[Linguistics in the Netherlands 35] 2018
► pp. 65–78

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF

Processing delays

The late reactivation of the argument of unaccusative verbs

 | Macquarie University
 | University College London
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 3 December 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00005.kor
Abstract
An eye-tracking experiment using the Visual World Paradigm (VWP) shows that in on-line sentence processing in English the argument of an unaccusative verb reactivates late after verb offset. In contrast to previous studies, this VWP experiment establishes the exact time course of this effect, which matches the time course previously found for Dutch, despite differences in word order between the two languages. Furthermore, it uncovers an early reactivation of the argument of unergative verbs that has previously gone unnoticed. Such an effect has previously been observed for Dutch, but not for English. Moreover, the effect seems to occur earlier in English than in Dutch. We suggest that this difference may be due to the more rigid word order of English, which provides the parser with more informative cues.
Article outline
  • 1.Traces of unaccusativity
  • 2.Tracking late reactivation effects
  • 3.Tracking early reactivation effects
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (30)
References
Agnew, Zarinah K., Hans van de Koot, Carolyn McGettigan & Sophie K. Scott. 2014. “Do sentences with unaccusative verbs involve syntactic movement? Evidence from neuroimaging.” Language, cognition and neuroscience 29 (9): 1035–1045. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry T. 1998. “Ambiguity in sentence processing.” Trends in cognitive sciences 2 (4): 146–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry T. & Yuki Kamide. 2007. “The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing.” Journal of Memory and Language 571: 502–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, Gerry & Mark J. Steedman. 1988. “Interaction with context during human sentence processing.” Cognition 301: 191–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burkhardt, Petra, Maria M. Pinango & Keng Wong. 2003. “The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentence comprehension: Evidence from split intransitivity.” Brain and Language 861: 9–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian syntax: A government-binding approach. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, Roger. M. 1974. “The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing.” Cognitive Psychology 61: 84–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, Stephen & Mark J. Steedman. 1985. “On not being led up the garden path: the use of context by the psychological parser.” Natural language parsing: Psychological, computational, and theoretical perspectives ed. by D. Dowty, L. Karttunen and A. Zwicky, 320–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn. 1979. On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama. 2007. “Young children and A-chains: The acquisition of Hebrew unaccusatives.” Language Acquisition 141: 377–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Gina Taranto, Lewis P. Shapiro, & David Swinney. 2008. “The leaf fell (the leaf): The online processing of unaccusatives.” Linguistic Inquiry 391: 355–377. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huettig, Falk & Gerry T. Altmann. 2005. “Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm.” Cognition 961: 23–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kimball, John. 1973. “Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language.” Cognition, 2 (1): 15–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koring, Loes, Pim Mak & Eric J. Reuland. 2012. “The time course of argument reactivation revealed: Using the visual world paradigm.” Cognition 123 (3): 361–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirman, Daniel. 2014. Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Chapman and Hall / CRC.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirman, Daniel, James A. Dixon, & James S. Magnuson. 2008. “Statistical and computational models of the visual world paradigm: Growth curves and individual differences.” Journal of Memory and Language 591: 475–494. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Momma, Shotta, L. Robert Slevc, & Colin Phillips. 2018. “Unaccusativity in sentence production.” Linguistic Inquiry 491: 181–194. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M. 1978. “Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis.” Proceedings of the fourth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society ed. by J. J. Jaeger, A. C. Woodbury, F. Ackerman, C. Chiarello, O. D. Gensler, J. Kingston, E. E. Sweetser, H. Thompson, & K. W. Whistler, 157–189. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David M., & Paul Postal. 1984. “The 1-advancement exclusiveness law.” Studies in relational grammar 21: 81–125.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perraudin, Sandrine & Pierre Mounoud. 2009. “Contribution of the priming paradigm to the understanding of the conceptual developmental shift from 5 to 9 years of age.” Developmental Science 121: 956–977. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poirier, Josée, Matthew Walenski & Lewis P. Shapiro. 2012. “The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora.” Language and cognitive processes 27 (6): 868–886. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya. 2000. “The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts.” OTS working papers in linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “The theta system: An overview.” Theoretical Linguistics 281: 229–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosen, Carol. 1981. “The relational structure of reflexive clauses: Evidence from Italian.” PhD Diss., Harvard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat, Naama Friedmann & Uri Hadar. 2010. “The Neural Correlates of Linguistic Distinctions: Unaccusative and Unergative Verbs.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 22 (10): 2306–2315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shetreet, Einat and Naama Friedmann. 2012. “Stretched, jumped, and fell: An fMRI investigation of reflexive verbs and other intransitives.” NeuroImage 601: 1800–1806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szekely, Anna, Thomas Jacobsen, Simona D’Amico, Antonella Devescovi, Elena Andonova, Dan Herron, et al. 2004. “A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies.” Journal of Memory and Language 511: 247–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanenhaus, Michael K., Michael J. Spivey-Knowlton, Kathleen M. Eberhard & Julie C. Sedivy. 1995. “Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension.” Science 2681: 1632–1634. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yee, Eiling & Julie C. Sedivy. 2006. “Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 321: 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Krogh, Simone & Liina Pylkkänen
2025. Manipulating syntax without taxing working memory: MEG correlates of syntactic dependencies in a verb-second language. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 40:10 ► pp. 1390 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue