In:Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 16: Papers from the 2017 Budapest Conference
Edited by Veronika Hegedűs and Irene Vogel
[Approaches to Hungarian 16] 2020
► pp. 97–114
Get fulltext
Testing variability effects in Hungarian vowel harmony
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.05pat
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.05pat
Abstract
Hungarian backness harmony shows various degrees of transparency and variation, but the empirical testing of these variability
effects in corpora is problematic because of data sparseness. We have created an experiment using harmonically mixed stems and
four different harmonic suffixes, and collected information about the variants from native speakers in the form of a sentence
completion task. We show that there are significant differences between stem types, and that the harmonic suffix can also
affect the behaviour of the stem. Our results confirm that native speakers can learn unnatural patterns and that they obey the
Law of Frequency Matching (Hayes et al. 2009).
Keywords: vowel harmony, variation, vacillation, neutral vowels, experimental phonology
Article outline
- 1.Harmony
- 2.Experiment
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Stimuli
- 2.3Method and procedure
- 2.4Results
- 2.4.1Results by generalized type – Count Effect
- 2.4.2Height Effect
- 2.4.3Cumulativity 1
- 2.4.4Cumulativity 2
- 2.4.5Comparisons of C-final vs V-final roots
- 3.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (16)
Bowman, Samuel R. 2013. Two arguments for a
positive vowel harmony imperative. Ms. Stanford [ROA
1181].
Dankovics, Natália & Csaba Pléh. 2001. Hangrestaurációs
jelenségek és alaktani feldolgozás a magyarban: Azt halljuk-e, amit várunk? [Sound
restauration and morphological processing in Hungarian: Do we hear what we expect to
hear?] In Csaba Pléh & Ágnes Lukács (eds.), A magyar morfológia pszicholingvisztikája [The
psycholinguistics of Hungarian
morphology], 55–83. Budapest: Osiris.
Halácsy, Péter, András Kornai, László Németh, András Rung, István Szakadát & Viktor Trón. 2004. Creating
open language resources for
Hungarian. In Proceedings of Language
Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC04).
LREC, 203–210. [URL]
Hayes, Bruce & Zsuzsa Cziráky Londe. 2006. Stochastic
phonological knowledge: The case of Hungarian vowel
harmony. Phonology 23. 59–104.
Hayes, Bruce, Kie Zuraw, Péter Siptár & Zsuzsa Londe. 2009. Natural
and unnatural constraints in Hungarian vowel
harmony. Language 85. 822–863.
Lukács, Ágnes, Laurence B. Leonard, Bence Kas & Csaba Pléh. 2009. The
use of tense and agreement by Hungarian-speaking children with language
impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research
52/1. 1–22.
Rebrus, Péter & Péter Szigetvári. 2016. Diminutives:
Exceptions to harmonic uniformity. Catalan Journal of
Linguistics 15. 101–119.
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2013. Magánhangzó-diszharmónia [Vowel
disharmony]. Talk delivered at the Research Institute for
Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences,
Budapest, 22 October.
. 2016. A
non-cumulative pattern in vowel harmony: A frequency-based
account. In Gunnar Ólafur Hansson, Ashley Farris-Trimble, Kevin McMullin & Douglas Pulleyblank (eds.), Proceedings
of the 2015 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.
Rebrus, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy.2017. Gradient
harmonicity in compounds. In Karen Jesney, Charlie O’Hara, Caitlin Smith & Rachel Walker(eds.), Proceedings
of the 2016 Annual Meeting on Phonology. Washington, DC.: Linguistic Society of America.