In:Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 16: Papers from the 2017 Budapest Conference
Edited by Veronika Hegedűs and Irene Vogel
[Approaches to Hungarian 16] 2020
► pp. 5–24
Get fulltext
Non-degree equatives and reanalysis
A case study of doubling patterns in German and Hungarian
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 8 April 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.01bac
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.16.01bac
Abstract
The article examines reanalysis processes underlying doubling patterns in non-degree equatives in German and Hungarian. In
German, the combination als wie (lit. ‘as how’) is attested historically and in certain present-day dialects.
Traditionally, it is assumed to be a mixed pattern involving the earlier canonical equative complementiser
als and the later canonical equative complementiser wie; however, more recent proposals
suggest that als was in fact reanalysed from the matrix clause. While matrix equative markers and equative
complementisers are surface-similar in German historically, these elements are distinct in Hungarian throughout its history.
Based on the results of a corpus study on Old Hungarian, the paper argues that reanalysis from the matrix clause is indeed
possible and starts in non-degree equatives.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The syntax of equatives
- 3.Equatives in German
- 4.Equatives in Old Hungarian
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (29)
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia. 2014a. Cyclical
change in Hungarian
comparatives. Diachronica 31(6). 465–505.
. 2014b. The
syntax of comparative constructions: Operators, ellipsis phenomena and functional left
peripheries. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
. 2018a. Deletion
phenomena in comparative constructions: English comparatives in a cross-linguistic
perspective. Berlin: Language Science Press.
. 2018b. Deutsche
Dialekte und ein anti-kartografischer Ansatz zur
CP-Domäne. In Augustin Speyer & Philipp Rauth (eds.), Syntax
aus Saarbrücker Sicht 2: Beiträge der SaRDiS-Tagung zur
Dialektsyntax, 9–29. Stuttgart: Steiner.
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. The
syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic
Inquiry 4(3). 275–343.
Gelderen, Elly van. 2004. Grammaticalization as
economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2009. Renewal in the left
periphery: Economy and the complementiser layer. Transactions of the Philological
Society 107(4). 131–195.
Haspelmath, Martin & Oda Buchholz. 1998. Equative
and similative constructions in the languages of
Europe. In Johan van der Auwera & Dónall Ó Baoill (eds.), Adverbial
constructions in the languages of
Europe, 277–334. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hohaus, Vera & Malte Zimmermann. 2014. Equatives
outside the domain of degree constructions. Paper presented at: Linguistic
Evidence 2014, Tübingen, Universität
Tübingen, 13–15 February 2014.
Jäger, Agnes. 2010. Der
Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische
Berichte 224. 467–493.
. 2016. Vergleichskonstruktionen
im Deutschen: Diachroner Wandel und synchrone
Variation. Universität zu Köln habilitation.
Kántor, Gergely. 2013. Hungarian
mint as Conj0. Talk delivered at: 11th International
Conference on the Structure of Hungarian (ICSH11), Piliscsaba, Pázmány Péter
Catholic University & Research Institute for Linguistics of the Hungarian Academy of
Sciences, 29–31 August 2013.
Kenesei, István. 1992. On
Hungarian complementisers. In István Kenesei & Csaba Pléh (eds.), Approaches
to Hungarian
4, 37–50. Szeged: JATE.
Kortmann, Bernd. 1997. Adverbial
subordination: A typology and history of adverbial subordinators based on European
languages. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Lechner, Winfried. 1999. Comparatives
and DP-structures. University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
Lipold, Günter. 1983. Möglichkeiten
der Komparation in den deutschen Dialekten. In Werner Besch, et al. (eds.), Dialektologie: Ein Handbuch zur deutschen und
allgemeinen
Dialektforschung, 1232–1241. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014. On
comparative complementizers in English: Evidence from historical
corpora. In Nila Méndez-Naya Vazques (ed.), Creation
and use of historical English corpora in
Spain, 311–333. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The
fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements
of
grammar, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic
change. A Minimalist approach to
grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simon, Eszter. 2014. Corpus
building from Old Hungarian codices. In Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), The
evolution of functional left peripheries in Hungarian
syntax, 224–236. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tarriño, Eusebia. 2011. Comparative
clauses. In Philip Bardi (ed.), Complex
sentences, grammaticalization,
typology, 373–426. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Vikner, Sten. 1995. Verb
movement and expletive subjects in the Germanic
languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2022. Discourse-driven asymmetries between embedded interrogatives and relative clauses in West Germanic. In Language Change at the Interfaces [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 275], ► pp. 189 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
