In:Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 15: Papers from the 2015 Leiden Conference
Edited by Harry van der Hulst and Anikó Lipták
[Approaches to Hungarian 15] 2017
► pp. 183–208
Chapter 7Hungarian classifier constructions, plurality and the mass–count distinction
Published online: 24 August 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.15.07sch
Abstract
We argue that Hungarian has both mass and count nouns, and a plural marker which is sensitive to the distinction, as well as a system of sortal classifiers. In English, most nouns are either mass (e.g mud) or count (e.g. book), and there are only a limited number of fully flexible nouns with both mass and count forms (e.g. stone/stones). In Hungarian, however, most count nouns are flexible, and a noun like rózsa ‘rose’ is ambiguous between a mass and a count item. This results in two ways of counting: rózsa as a count noun can be directly modified by a numeral as in két rózsa ‘two roses’, but if it is a mass noun counting uses a classifier construction as in két szál rózsa.
Keywords: mass/count, classifiers, plurality, bare NPs
Article outline
- 1.The problem
- 2.Plurality is not a classifier
- 3.Evidence for a mass/count distinction in Hungarian
- 4.Flexible nouns
- 5.Some crosslinguistic contextualisation
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (22)
Bale, Alan C. & David Barner. 2009. The interpretation of functional heads: using comparatives to explore the mass/count distinction. Journal of Semantics 26:3. 217–252.
Barner, David & Jesse Snedeker. 2005. Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count. Cognition 97:1. 41–66.
Carlson, Gregory. 1977. A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1. 413–457.
Cheng, Lisa & Rint Sybesma. 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30:4. 509–542.
Csirmaz, Anikó & Éva Dékány. 2014. Hungarian is a classifier language. In Simone Raffaele & Francesca Masini (eds.), Word Classes: Nature, Typology and Representations, 141–160. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Farkas, Donka & Henriette De Swart. 2003. The Semantics of Incorporation. Stanford Monographs in Linguistics. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Landman, Fred & Susan Rothstein. 2010. Incremental homogeneity in the semantics of aspectual for-phrases. In Malka Rappaport Hovav, Edit Doron & Ivy Sichel (eds.), Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, 229–251. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
. 2011. The felicity of aspectual for-phrases, part 1: homogeneity in the semantics of aspectual for-phrases. Language and Linguistics Compass 6.2, 85–96. Oxford: Blackwell-Wiley.
Li, XuPing. 2013. Numeral Classifiers in Chinese: The Syntax/Semantics Interface. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Pelletier, Francis Jeffry. 2012. Lexical Nouns are both +MASS and +COUNT but they are neither +MASS nor +COUNT. In Diane Massam (ed.), Count and Mass Across Languages, 9–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pires de Oliveira, Roberta & Susan Rothstein. 2011. Bare singular noun phrases are mass in Brazilian Portuguese. Lingua 121. 2153–2175.
Rothstein, Susan 2010. Counting, measuring and the mass-count distiction. The Journal of Semantics 27:3. 343–397.
. (to appear). Count vs. Mass. In Lisa Matthewson, Cécile Meier, Hotze Rullmann & Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Semantics (SemCom). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Sauerland, Uli. 2003. A new semantics for Number. In Rob Young & Yupng Zhou (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 13, 258–275. Ithaca: CLC Publications.
Schmitt, Cristina & Alan Munn. 1999. Against the nominal mapping parameter: Bare nouns in Brazilian Portuguese. In Nancy Hall, Masako Hirotani & Pius Tamanji Mako (eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Meeting of North East Linguistic Society (NELS 29), 339–354. Delaware: University of Delaware.
Cited by (42)
Cited by 42 other publications
ERBACH, Kurt & Delan KHEDER
Al-Zahre, Nisrine
Alexiadou, Artemis
Arka, I Wayan & Mary Dalrymple
Bale, Alan
Beck, Sigrid
Biedermann, Britta, Nora Fieder & Karen Smith-Lock
Butler, Lindsay
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia
Cabredo Hofherr, Patricia & Jenny Doetjes
Dali, Myriam & Eric Mathieu
de Swart, Henriëtte
Doetjes, Jenny
Doetjes, Jenny
Dotlačil, Jakub
Dékány, Éva
Farkas, Donka F.
Ferreira, Marcelo
Gehrke, Berit
Grimm, Scott
Henderson, Robert
Lima, Suzi
Marten, Lutz
Marušič, Franc & Rok Žaucer
Mous, Maarten
Paul, Moles, Anne Zribi-Hertz & Herby Glaude
Pfau, Roland & Markus Steinbach
Schiller, Niels O. & Rinus Verdonschot
Tomioka, Satoshi
Wiltschko, Martina
Zimmermann, Malte
Landman, Fred
Rothstein, Susan
Rothstein, Susan & Roberta Pires de Oliveira
2020.
Comparatives in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mass and Count in Linguistics, Philosophy, and Cognitive
Science [Language Faculty and Beyond, 16], ► pp. 141 ff.
Erbach, Kurt, Peter R. Sutton & Hana Filip
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
