Cover not available

In:Approaches to Hungarian: Volume 14: Papers from the 2013 Piliscsaba Conference
Edited by Katalin É. Kiss, Balázs Surányi and Éva Dékány
[Approaches to Hungarian 14] 2015
► pp. 267–292

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Acoustic properties of prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis

 | University of Delaware
Published online: 3 June 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/atoh.14.11vog
The acoustic properties associated with prominence (e.g. duration, F0) may also serve for “phonemic” contrasts. The question is thus how speakers correctly interpret these properties. We address this question in terms of an extension of the Functional Load Hypothesis (FLH): given that vowel length is contrastive in Hungarian, the FLH predicts that duration will not be the main cue to prominence (i.e. stress or focus). Based on a large, systematically collected corpus, we demonstrate that this is, in fact, the case; the main cue for both is pitch (F0), though its characteristics are different in the two cases. We also demonstrate that the vowel duration contrast is still present in the synchronic structure of Hungarian.
References (30)
References
Adank, Patti, Roel Smits & Roeland van Hout. 2004. A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 116 (5). 3099–3107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berinstein, Ava E. 1979. A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics. 47. 1–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blaho, Sylvia & Dániel Szeredi. 2011. (The non-existence of) secondary stress in Hungarian. In Tibor Laczkó & Catherine. O. Ringen (eds.). Approaches to Hungarian 12, 39–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2005. Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. [URL].
Chávez-Peón, Mario. 2008. Phonetic cues to stress in a tonal language: Prosodic prominence in San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. In Susie Jones (ed.). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Accociation. [URL].
. 2010. The interaction of metrical structure, tone, and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genzel, Susanne, Shinichiro Ishihara & Balázs Surányi. To appear. The prosodic expression of focus, contrast and givenness: A production study of Hungarian. Lingua.
Hammond, Michael. 1987. Hungarian cola. Phonology Yearbook 4. 267–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kálmán, László & Ádám Nádasdy. 1994. [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. A hangsúly [Stress]. In Ferenc Kiefer (ed.) Strukturális magyar nyelvtan: fonológia [A structural grammar of Hungarian: phonology]. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó. 393–467.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerek, Andrew. 1971. Hungarian metric: some linguistic aspects of iambic verse. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornai, András & László Kálmán. 1988. Hungarian sentence intonation. In Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds.), Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent. 183–195. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49. 606–608. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mády, Katalin. 2010. Hungarian vowel quantity neutralisation as a potential social marker. Acta Linguistica Hungarica. 57(2-3). 67–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Shortening of long high vowels in Hungarian: a perceptual loss? In Silvia Calamai, Chiara Celata & Luca Ciucci (eds.), Sociophonetics, at the crossroads of speech variation, processing and communication. Pisa, Italy: Edizioni della Normale. [URL]. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mády, Katalin & Felicitas Kleber. 2010. Variation of pitch accent patterns in Hungarian. Paper presented at the 5th Speech Prosody Conference. Chicago, USA.
Mády, Katalin & Uwe D. Reichel. 2007. Quantity distinction in the Hungarian vowel system – just theory or also reality? Proceedings of the 16th ICPhS . 1053–1056. Saarbrücken, Germany. [URL].
Mády, Katalin, Lasse Bombien & Uwe D. Reichel. 2008. Is Hungarian losing the vowel quantity distinction? In Rudolph Sock, Susanne Fuchs & Yves Laprie (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th International Seminar on Speech Production. 449–452. France: INRIA. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Magdics, Klára. 1960. [Cited in Mády 2012]. A szóvégi magánhangzók rövidülése a köznyelvben [Shortening of word-final vowels in colloquial speech]. Nyelvtudományi Közlemények 62. 301–324.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potisuk, Siripong, Jackson Gandour & Mary Harper. 1996. Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica 53. 200‐220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert. 2002. Lexically contrastive accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya. In Carlos Gussenhoven & Natasha Warner (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. 585–614. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siptár, Péter & Miklós Törkenczy. 2000. The Phonology of Hungarian. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Surányi, Balázs, Shinichiro Ishihara & Fabian Schubö. 2012. Syntax– prosody mapping, topic–comment structure and stress–focus correspondence in Hungarian. In Pilar Prieto & Gorka Elordieta (eds.) Prosody and Meaning. 35–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szeredi, Dániel. 2008. Centralized vowels in Hungarian. In László Kálmán (ed.), Papers from the Mókus Conference. 51–62. Budapest: Tinta Publishing House.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szinnyei, Josef. 1912. [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. Ungarische Sprachlehre [Hungarian Language Teaching]. Berlin: Göschen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Varga, László. 2000. [Cited in Blaho & Szeredi. 2011]. A magyar mellékhangsúly fonológiai státusáról [On the phonological status of the Hungarian secondary stress]. Magyar Nyelvőr 124. 99–108.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Intonation and stress: evidence from Hungarian. Hempshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou & Nadya Pincus. Forthcoming. Prominence, contrast and the functional load hypothesis: an acoustic investigation. In Rob Goedemans, Jeffrey Heinz & Harry van der Hulst (eds.), Accent and Stress. Cambridge: University Press.
Vogel, Irene & István Kenesei. 1987. The interface between phonology and other components of grammar: the case of Hungarian. Phonology Yearbook 4. 243–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, Laurence & Katalin Mády. 2008. The long and the short and the final: phonological vowel length and prosodic timing in Hungarian. In Plinio A. Barbosa, Sandra Madureira & César Reis (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th Speech Prosody Conference . 363–366. Campinas, Brazil.
Winn, Matthew, Allison Blodgett, Jessica Bauman, Anita Bowles, Lykara Charters, Anton Rytting & Jessica Shamoo. 2008. A comparison of native speaker and American adult learner Vietnamese lexical tones. CASL Technical Report. [URL].
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Athanasopoulou, Angeliki, Quinn Goddard & Darin Flynn
2025. Plains Cree Word Prosody Revisited. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 55:1-2 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Kallio, Heini, Antti Suni & Juraj Šimko
2022. Fluency-related Temporal Features and Syllable Prominence as Prosodic Proficiency Predictors for Learners of English with Different Language Backgrounds. Language and Speech 65:3 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
ATHANASOPOULOU, ANGELIKI, IRENE VOGEL & NADYA PINCUS
2021. Prosodic prominence in a stressless language: An acoustic investigation of Indonesian. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 695 ff. DOI logo
Vogel, Irene
2020. Fixed stress as phonological redundancy. In Approaches to Hungarian [Approaches to Hungarian, 16], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Surányi, Balázs & Gergő Turi
2018. Quantifier scope in sentence prosody?. Acta Linguistica Academica 65:2-3 ► pp. 385 ff. DOI logo
Lunden, Anya, Jessica Campbell, Mark Hutchens & Nick Kalivoda
2017. Vowel-length contrasts and phonetic cues to stress: an investigation of their relation. Phonology 34:3 ► pp. 565 ff. DOI logo
Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou & Nadya Pincus
2016. Prominence, Contrast, and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation. In Dimensions of Phonological Stress, ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Vogel, Irene, Angeliki Athanasopoulou & Nadya Pincus
2017. Acoustic properties of prominence and foot structure in Arabic. In Perspectives on Arabic linguistics XXIX [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 5], ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue